just getting into Transfer and i'm running into my first problem:
this works just fine:
cfset Local.UserTO = Transfer.get( User, 1 )
and it returns a record with Username = Admin
but both of these will always return a new(empty) TO even though the
properties are all correct. any ideas?
cfset
, or the save is
happening under a different application name?
Care to post the cache portion of your transfer config?
Chris Peterson
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, this is my first full application i'm doing with Transfer and i'm
having a problem
if it is somehow getting setup
with a different instance of Transfer.
Matt Williams
On Jan 27, 8:04 am, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
there are no caching options set in the transfer config, so they're
the defaults.
the cache updates correctly for 1-2 of the objects, but not for most
.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
i tried it with Application.objvarname.setProperty()... but no go.
should i try setting the cache options in the transfer config file to
a different scope?
On Jan 27, 2:59 pm, jonathanburnham jonathanburn...@gmail.com
there's nothing to debug really (though i do with Firebug). changing
data via the Remote Proxy/Ajax works fine and the database is updated,
but when i reload the page, the old data is displayed. if i do an ?
init=true i see the correct data. so i'm lost on how to tell Transfer,
without doing an
via Remote Proxy/Ajax calls, but not for the others.
On Jan 27, 4:53 pm, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
there's nothing to debug really (though i do with Firebug). changing
data via the Remote Proxy/Ajax works fine and the database is updated,
but when i reload the page, the old data
to persist) and the one that persists properly?
Chris
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
damn, now i was thinking this must be it, a simple change and all
should be good, but still no go. argh!
On Jan 27, 5:12 pm, Chris Peterson overrid...@gmail.com wrote
hey, i have my relationship set up like this:
manytomany name=Bilder table=ProjekteBilder
link to=Projekte.Projekte column=FK_ProjektID /
link to=Bilder column=FK_BildID /
collection type=arrayorder property=OrderNum order=asc //
collection
/manytomany
the collection is not sorted by the
have access to it. The order
property must point to a property in the Bilder table, in your example.
Although I would have expected Transfer to throw an error is the OrderNum
were not in the Bilder table, so maybe I'm totally off base.
Bob
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Chris H
for that object look like?
Mark
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, i first had it in the ProjekteBilder Table, which did throw an
error. it is now in the Bilder Table and no errors is thrown, but the
resulting array is not sorted by that column.
thanks
replies though!
On Mar 13, 9:56 am, Chris H 3darkli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Mark,
here are the relevant declarations:
object name=Bilder
id name=BildID type=numeric /
property name=Filename type=string /
property name=OrderNum type=numeric /
/object
!-- PROJEKTE --
package name=Projekte
If the access property of a function is not defined, it defaults to
public. But Transfer is looking for it during during the creation of
the advise method creation, because an Element ACCESS is undefined
in METADATA.: error is thrown if it is not explicitly defined. can
this be fixed to use the
12 matches
Mail list logo
