Thanks Andy for your comments. We will incorporate your suggestion in the
next version of the document.
Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> I just reviewed draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls-01, with particular
> attention to the pseu
Hi Andrew and Matthew,
Thanks for the review. We are working on the revised draft
Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Susan Hares wrote:
> Andrew and Matthew:
>
>
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
>
>
> Sue
>
>
>
> *From:* rtg-di
Hi Andy and Mathew,
Thanks for your comments. Plz find our response inline between
tags
P.S: Sorry. Was tied up with some work and hence the delay.
Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> I’ve got some comments on Matthew’s review, inl
Hi All,
I agree that this functionality is required for connecting two trill sites
which are separated by MPLS cloud.
Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler.
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> Sue,
>
> My comments have been resolved, and I feel that this draft is
I’m not aware of any IPRs.
Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 9:54 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls need to post an
> IPR declaration for this draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Donal
Hi,
I support this draft and see the comments inline.
Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG last call on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00
> from 1/19/2018 to 2/2/2018.
>
>
>
> During your WG last cal