Hi All, I agree that this functionality is required for connecting two trill sites which are separated by MPLS cloud.
Regards, S. Kingston Smiler. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]> wrote: > Sue, > > My comments have been resolved, and I feel that this draft is ready for > publication. And to answer your first question, yes, this is needed > functionality. > > Thanks, > Andy > > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This begins a 1 week extension to the WG LC for >> draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-MPLS that we started last November. Due >> to a comment from Andy Malis: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07971.html >> >> We took a set-back and solved these problems. Please review this draft >> again for the following points: >> >> 1) Does TRILL need to run over MPLS? Some data centers are >> interconnected over MPLS. Does this capability aid in deployment of TRILL? >> >> 2) Is this specification ready for publication? >> >> 3) Do you know of any problems with this specification? >> >> If I get enough comments within the 1st week, we will close this WG LC. >> If not, we will length it. >> >> >> >> Please remember we are trying to complete all WG LCs by the end of >> February. Please be prompt to answer these WG LC requests so that we can >> include all the drafts in the WG LCs. >> >> >> >> Cheerily, Susan Hares >> >> _______________________________________________ >> trill mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > trill mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill > >
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
