Re: [Trisquel-users] [Bug] Menuy

On 13.6.2020 17:41, x.wokl...@gmail.com wrote: > Trisquel 8.0 > MATE Desktop > > I found a bug: > 1) Left-click on your dropdown menu > 2) Expand some category (i.e. Games) > 3) Right-click on some item on this category > 4) Right-click on the dropdown menu again. > > And you're done. Whole menu

[Trisquel-users] Re : Are there better hostname resolvers than dig or nslookup ?

awk '{print $0}' 'MB-HorribleSed-Set01.txt' | sed ... Just give MB-HorribleSed-Set01.txt as an argument to sed! The first hostname is a mess of hexadecimal characters, but the script deciphers the other three nicely. I wrote in my last post: "If you want the separator to be any string of at

Re: [Trisquel-users] about the "Do Not Track" signal

I have just understood my explanation had kind of a double meaning. I could not receive the camera but it was kind of my will. If I was going to receive it seriously, I was able to do it, but I did not do it. It is difficult to explain why. But I did not lose even one yen for the deal, full

Re: [Trisquel-users] Are there better hostname resolvers than dig or nslookup ?

Actually, a few came along a little sooner, along with their addresses: 2a00:1110:253:910b:5ca1:eb1e:c7f9:9ae1 2A0011100253910B5CA1EB1EC7F99AE1.mobile.pool.telekom.hu 2a00:1110:656:55f8:f243:e02e:c1dc:21d1 2A001110065655F8F243E02EC1DC21D1.mobile.pool.telekom.hu

Re: [Trisquel-users] Are there better hostname resolvers than dig or nslookup ?

Magic Banana's Horrible-Sed script has potential: awk '{print $0}' 'MB-HorribleSed-Set01.txt' | sed

[Trisquel-users] Re : Are there better hostname resolvers than dig or nslookup ?

Assuming the eight four-digit fields are always separated by either no character or one single character, which must always be the same, that horrible sed substitution does the work:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Are there better hostname resolvers than dig or nslookup ?

Continuing this thread: Long pointer records like the following aren't easily resolvable by dig but their embedded IPv6 addresses are plainly visible: 2001-1c05-0001-e6e5-99c1-3191-b0e7-aca8.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl 2806-1000-0001-ae95-7768-0cea-3f9e-7ba0.ipv6.infinitum.net.mx

[Trisquel-users] Are there better hostname resolvers than dig or nslookup ?

Here are three hostnames that do not have embedded addresses: dbbvxj3yl0rc53l1vf8ct-4.rev.dnainternet.fi node-1w7jr9wnqcus27otj0ldvrzd4.ipv6.telus.net ptr-gooru9pqyo5unun4j40.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be Dig will return authoritative nameservers for the first and third of the above three

Re: [Trisquel-users] about the "Do Not Track" signal

"No, I have never heard of such an awful story." You ordered a camera, they did not sell it to you and later that specific camera price got increased. I ordered shoes, they did not sell me the shoes and later shoes price got increased. "I am not sure if they were taking about it. It sounded

Re: [Trisquel-users] about the "Do Not Track" signal

By using a proprietary program, you are agreeing to unjust EULA (End User License Agreement) which states that they can collect your data and do other malicious actions against you and your freedom. Don't use proprietary software. PowerPoint you say? PowerPoint is a part of Microsoft Office

Re: [Trisquel-users] about the "Do Not Track" signal

I am confused. In order to sort out and understand what you say, we are creating a schematic diagram by PowerPoint. Please wait a minute. I want to understand this perfectly.