Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : The best terminal?

2019-06-06 Thread mason
> Different kind of "history" (maybe the term is not proper): I am > referring to how many lines the commands you executed can output in the > terminal before the oldest lines are lost (scrolling up, you will not > reach the first command you executed after launching the terminal > emulator). I

[Trisquel-users] Re : The best terminal?

2019-06-06 Thread lcerf
Different kind of "history" (maybe the term is not proper): I am referring to how many lines the commands you executed can output in the terminal before the oldest lines are lost (scrolling up, you will not reach the first command you executed after launching the terminal emulator). There

Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : The best terminal?

2019-06-06 Thread mason
> a possibly large history Would the terminal emulator make a difference in this respect? Using a different terminal emulator wouldn't impose a limit on the size of ~/.bash_history, right? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[Trisquel-users] Re : The best terminal?

2019-06-05 Thread lcerf
What "advanced features"? I use GNOME Terminal. It does not have anything particularly fancy, but it has all I want: tabs (and keyboard shortcuts to open/close/navigate), configurable colors, a possibly large history, keyboard shortcuts that conflict with Bash's (basically Emacs) can be