Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-05-14 Thread clua . eduardo
This is kinda off-topic, but i'm running Trisquel on a Acer Aspire 5315 and it really surprised me that the laptop's wifi-thing just worked right away. I'm not saying that you should go buy one of these, but I'm not saying that you shouldn't either.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-05-13 Thread calmstorm
What about MNT Reform?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-05-13 Thread calmstorm
I hope someone will make better usb wifi adapters some day. I wonder if Luke would be willing to make some if he knew the others were junk...

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-05-13 Thread calmstorm
MNT Reform Laptop/Eoma68 Laptop are the only good options if they ever get released that is... ;) I am hopeful they will in the future, but I am not sure you will get any noticeable security boost in arm vs intel for this reason:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-05-13 Thread mason
> From what I remember, the problem I was having with the first one > was similar to yours an the replacement worked fine. I ordered a batch of five so that I could lend them out to people who I set up with Trisquel. All of them perform poorly. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-05-13 Thread strypey
I got a USB WiFi dongle from ThinkPenguin that I suspect was part of a bad batch. After a series of emails where we triaged the problem and confirmed it couldn't be solved, ThinkPenguin offered me a replacement. The original dongle I ordered was this one:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread andyprough
Yes, I should have made it clear in my post about Panfrost working with Tuxcart and Kodi that it will be relevant to the Pinebook Pro, and not the original Pinebook. That could be an interesting laptop for $199, if Panfrost continues to develop quickly this year. This is all stuff I am

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread jason
Okay; so maybe it's relevant for the Pinebook "Pro" then, and not the original Pinebook.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread andyprough
Hi jxself, yes the Pinebook uses the A64, but from everything I'm reading the Pinebook Pro will have the Pine64 Rockchip RK3399 with MALI T-860 Quad-Core GPU when it is released later this year.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread jason
That is good news for Panfrost but seems to not matter for the Pinebook? Please let me know if I am following things correctly, with citations: The Pinebook [0] will use the Pine A64 single board computer [1]. The Pine A64 single board computer is made using the Allwinner A64 SoC [2]. The

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread Mason Hock
> PCI vs USB WI-FI results argument is totally void. There is no such thing. > > Check stock TL-WN721N/TL-WN722N or what thinkpenguin/tehcnoetical have. When I began migrating to free software, I bought several ThinkPenguin WiFi dongles and used them for a year. It was extremely frustrating. I

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread andyprough
News just today that the community Mali 3D driver, Panfrost, is now running Tuxcart and Kodi: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Panfrost-Gallium-Kodi-STK

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread andyprough
Raptor should be releasing the Blackbird Power9 mainboard soon, an ATX style board for under $1,000, making owning a personal Power9 desktop far more affordable.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-02 Thread john-doe
PCI vs USB WI-FI results argument is totally void. There is no such thing. Check stock TL-WN721N/TL-WN722N or what thinkpenguin/tehcnoetical have. Pinebook PRO vs X200 size and weight x4 silent (no fans, no HDD) Ram 4GB LPDDR4 dual-channel vs 4GB/8GB DDR3 Battery life Number of cores: 6 vs 2

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-01 Thread Mason Hock
> I'm assuming you've tried the full-sized USB dongles with the flip > antenna, like this one? > https://www.ebay.com/itm/Atheros-AR9271-802-11n-150Mbps-Wireless-USB-WiFi-Adapter-for-Linux-Kali-Linux/302918103655?hash=item4687537267:g:NpsAAOSwAI9bv-wl > > I've had a lot of luck with them. No, I

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-01 Thread Mason Hock
> It's not a laptop but there's also the TALOS II. You'll never see POWER9 > in a laptop. If I had to give up the laptop form factor in order to have > a future in freedom then I could do that. I'm already there. Most of my > computers are not laptops. Portability aside, the TALOS II is extremely

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-01 Thread jason
"That's why I said that I'm glad to see exploration of alternative architectures. I hope to eventually see non-x86 laptops that are better than the aging librebootable ThinkPads, but it doesn't seem like we're there yet" It's not a laptop but there's also the TALOS II. You'll never see

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-01 Thread andyprough
I'm assuming you've tried the full-sized USB dongles with the flip antenna, like this one? https://www.ebay.com/itm/Atheros-AR9271-802-11n-150Mbps-Wireless-USB-WiFi-Adapter-for-Linux-Kali-Linux/302918103655?hash=item4687537267:g:NpsAAOSwAI9bv-wl I've had a lot of luck with them.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-01 Thread Mason Hock
> chaosmonk Doesn't every recent AMD/Nvidia graphic card require > proprietary firmwares for 3D accel? I think so. > EVERY device that runs Trisquel you stick PCI or USB card if you want > WI-FI period. Yes, and I have had great results with PCI and very poor results with USB. > How this works

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-04-01 Thread john-doe
jxself you have my props and kudos and appreciation. Thatoo don't worry, just have patience and we'll see. Most (All?) chinese ARM SoCs "boot on" u-boot. chaosmonk Doesn't every recent AMD/Nvidia graphic card require proprietary firmwares for 3D accel? How this works out? "freedom-wise" every

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-31 Thread thatoo
I thought there were no modern laptop that can boot on libreboot... Would it not be better to be able to install Trisquel on a computer you can trust from boot with the only compromise of using a usb-wifi adapter? I might have miss something there.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-30 Thread jason
Linux-libre is already being built for 64-bit ARM: https://jxself.org/linux-libre/ A good freedom test might be for someone that already owns this board to test it out and see what happens. Of course, I am not suggesting that anyone get it merely for testing; only if someone already has

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-30 Thread andyprough
Panfrost does now work with support for EGL and OpenGL ES, as well as Wayland and media playback and has a driver merged in Mesa and is pushing for its kernel DRM driver to be accepted for mainline kernel inclusion.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-30 Thread Mason Hock
> Pinebook pro can work natively > with ubuntu and proprietary blobs and if you buy a usb-wifi adapter, it > could even work 100% freely with Trisquel (for example). This has been true of every laptop I've encountered, so it isn't remarkable. The only problems I often run into with laptops are

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-30 Thread thatoo
Nice discussion, I learned plenty of stuff. Thank you to both of you. So, if I understand well, the Pinebook Pro with a usb-wifi adapter could work without any proprietary blob. So for a first work from Pine64, if we forget the "experimental" Pinebook (not pro) which was quiet light for most

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-30 Thread jason
"Do you know any device that has soldered WI-FI chip that is not "needing proprietary software" ?" Sadly, I don't. But: That it may be common among the various SoC as you say doesn't make it untrue of this particular one as well so I don't get the objection to mentioning it about this

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-30 Thread john-doe
Nope. Please. Do you know any device that has soldered WI-FI chip is not "needing proprietary software" ? All such chips are PCI or USB. (If there is SDIO one I really want to know about it). Graphics/display output is properly working presently. 3D and Video accelarion is a different thing

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-29 Thread jason
"...in the works." Which of course means they're not working presently, which is consistent with the earlier information. "For WI-FI just stick one tiny usb-wifi adapter. " This is also consistent with the earlier information about the built-in WiFi needing proprietary software. It's good

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-29 Thread john-doe
GPUs in x86 (AMD/NVIDIA) have 3D, Video accelaration (encode/decode) and render/display together. Tt is different from GPUs in ARM SoC where these 3 parts are separate and independent Intelectual Property (IP) blocks. Mali is the 3D (OpenGLES). It's NOT needed to have a working

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-24 Thread jason
"whats wrong with Mali" Needing proprietary software it what's wrong. :) To quote from https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Hardware/ReverseEngineering#Mali: "Mali GPUs are divided into three versions: Utgard, Midgard, and Bifrost. The Lima project is creating a free software driver for the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-24 Thread thatoo
Hello, I'm not sure this answer is useful and it means something about freedom but I think it's fair I share with you the answer I got on Pine64's forum : Thatoo, whats wrong with Mali (and its not really a choice - its on the SOCs)? there is both panfrost and lima in the works ... I

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-22 Thread thatoo
Understood. Thank you for this clear answer.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-22 Thread jason
Trisquel 9 is supposed to support ARM. "could it run on this specific laptop" I stopped reading when finding that it has a Mali GPU and also RTL8723BS for WiFi. Both of these need proprietary software, which Trisquel wouldn't provide. "would it be possible to dream of a Trisquel Touch,

[Trisquel-users] Trisquel on Arm? Pinebook Pro running Trisquel? Trisquel Touch?

2019-03-22 Thread thatoo
Hello everybody, I've just discovered the announcement of the Pinebook Pro, https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=7093 . Reading on the forum, in thread from 2012 and 2014, I understood Trisquel was not supporting arm. What about today? Maybe the coming Trisquel 9? Do you think then,