The safest thing is to not use a computer at all.
Being offline doesn't protect you from exploitation of back-doors. If you've
got any mission critical data, the only way to be safe is to ensure your no
non-free software EVER handles it unencrypted.
The best idea is using offline computer. No network — no problem.
And that your storage medium is encrypted. Who knows what back-doors can be
found in HDD/SSD firmware?
Uh Banane? I think we should stop feeding the troll
Wikipedia? This site using non-free files. Fair use? DO NOT USE!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delirium
It is your decision not to trust the FSF, but please note that 'Libreboot'
did not attack the FSF. The project's leader (Leah Rowe) made accusations
against the FSF, which have thus far not been supported either way.
Furthermore, please note that the firings from the FSF had *absolutely
Libreboot attack FSF. Not crack. Some people are (might be) fired from FSF.
It is because Libreboot.
I cannot now trust Libreboot. I need another free BIOS firmware.
Libreboot did not attack Trisquel. Why would you want to crack the FSF or
Libreboot servers? How will that help free software?
The Trisquel project is attacked by Libreboot, yes?
Which side is more right?
0. Libreboot. Attack FSF server. Lots of damage for free software.
1. FSF. Attack Libreboot server.
2. Do nothing.
English version needed.
What company are bad for now? FSF or Libreboot?
I'm not sure how much can be trusted. I already know that some of the events
have been mischaracterized which already made me wonder what else might be
but now I see that the story itself of who did what is also changing.
Example: Originally Leah accused Rubén of supposedly taking sides with
Crack my own computer?
Who is my new enemy? FSF or Libreboot… or Internet?
Leaked.
Not enough security, lamers!
Thank you 'stas730',
Don't worry about ussual trisquel forum admins. I recommend you to use
another free distro: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
See these for mor info about how they act:
https://trisquel.info/en/search/node/libreboot
https://libreboot.org/gnu/
"Ruben
Of course a whitelist would be more effective. Or you could take North
Korea's approach: don't allow access to the Internet at all.
No one is going to choose to use a browser designed to restrict what websites
you are allowed to visit, though.
> The computers are evil* because many people using non-free software
I hope you already installed a coreboot/libreboot open/free software BIOS to
your computer? You know, the default UEFI has plenty of security
vulnerabilities, which could undermine your "VERY secret project" :P
If you trust only the certain websites, wouldn't it be easier to use a whitte
list rather than black? You would be expanding your allowed sites list
gradually. Less convenient, but much more secure because you can't just block
everything bad - it is impossible! so block by default, and add
Security through obscurity sucks, hopefully your "VERY secure system" will be
fully transparent in the end
The number is 512 ! :) If yours is different, it is possible to solve this
riddle in almost infinite number of ways, receiving the different results ;)
Assembly isn't that bad. However, I doubt stas730 would need it for his/her
"secret project."
da fuq?
Don't forget about Go and Python!
> I must learn C, C++ and Assembler. Maybe, Qt. Then I will start developing
my secret project.
Jesus, assembly? Are you a masochist or what?
> You cannot send PM now. I cannot trust people, so I will not publish any
more information about secret project.
It sounds like you have a sense
It is binary code, yes? I will try later because it's too late now.
> Disabling JavaScript, sending an empty user agent
Sending an empty user agent would definitely make the fingerprinting easier.
Disabling javascript on the contrary will make it much more difficult as your
browser (provided it is a decent browser with decent settings) will suddenly
send
I want to know if you are a serious people.
Because you must be very good if you want do all this stuff.
Try to solve this and give me the number hiding inside.
♥♥▼♥▼♥▼ ♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥
♥♥ ♥♥▼▼▼♥▼ ♥▼
♥♥▼▼♥▼ ▼▼▼ ♥♥▼▼♥♥♥
♥♥▼♥▼♥ ♥♥▼▼♥▼ ▼▼▼
♥♥♥ ♥♥▼♥▼▼▼ ♥▼
▼♥▼
This account is old. I'm not using this account now.
I will not support all freeing projects anymore. The computers are evil*
because many people using non-free software. I think, I will finish using
latest non-free software after learning programming. I must learn C, C++ and
Assembler.
This is sort of off-topic (I agree with you completely), but:
I am not sure whether Mangos contains proprietary code, but if not, it could
still be a good piece of software. The Mana World server was originally based
on such a kind of software used to host private MMO servers.
gnu.org is not free software, not least of all because it is not software.
(you are correct, it is CC BY-ND)
> Hint: what will happens if Internet will be non-free? We will finish using
Internet.
Maybe we will use GNUnet? https://gnunet.org/ :)
I want to delete my email address (on proprietary hosting). You cannot send
PM for me now.
We can block non-free websites using databases. Using "Report non-free
website" button and just blocking popular non-free websites.
What is gnu.org license? CC-BY-ND? Free software or not?
block nonfree websites? how do you plan to do this? if you mean librejs, you
will be doing people a disservice because tor browser is designed to be
anonymous - running arbitrary code (you can never check what the "free" sites
are actually sending you) removes anonymity!
"Hint: if non-free
duckduckgo can be used without javascript
I will include GNU addons.
I will change default setting for maximal security.
I will modify SafeBrowsing & make FreeBrowsing mod (with database. First
websites to block:
*google.com
*github.com (but free mirror (readonly code access only) will be available)
*nsa.gov (you must know why)
I want to release TorFree Browser.
- No DRM (if it is closed source, otherwise warning user "There is a DRM
content.")
- Maximal security by default (disabled JS, cookies, safebrowsing is enabled,
but not Google, my own website). Images… disable or not? Fully disabling,
not partially.
-
> DuckDuckGo is non-free. YaCy is free
Yes. We know.
https://github.com/asciimoo/searx/wiki/Searx-instances
> I will release my own browser soon (or not?).
?
41 matches
Mail list logo
