Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-04 Thread sigdpsy
So, Trisquel 8.0 or Uruk2.0 is not complete yet.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-04 Thread intheforest
>you mentioned having access to a pretty fast and powerful machine. YES. I meant files sent via internet. I just didn't have enough patience..

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-03 Thread sigdpsy
mision@vision:~$ sudo apt-get install gnome Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-03 Thread sigdpsy
mision@vision:~$ sudo apt-get install cairo-dock Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-01 Thread i_write_words
Yea, that's why I miss virtualizing so much. It really is best to wait for the stable release when you need to get your work done. My gamer kid enjoys bleeding edge sometimes, but I stick to my Trisquel 7 on at least one machine. You might be able to virtualize the 32 bit image. IIRC, you

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-01 Thread intheforest
Heh

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-10-01 Thread intheforest
hmm... It turned out that it's quit risky.. Installation of files takes too long.. Maybe I should update system after installation.. Anyway he is happy with his 'Free side of the force' Trisquel ;) I will do some testing and if everything is fine, I will dual boot it with Uruk. If not, we

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-30 Thread i_write_words
He's going to love it. Thanks for the screenshot, MD. SHAHIDUL ISLAM. I'm going to sound like a hypocrite for listing my reasons for preferring 32 bit, since I miss virtualizing and am whining about needing DVDs and cheap used hard drives to check out 2.0. 32 bit machines are more

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-30 Thread intheforest
Just downloaded one for x64.. Gonna install it on my little brother's computer.. He is so curious.. :))

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-18 Thread elr
i3 It is not recommended for new people in GNU/Linux(-libre).

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-06 Thread pinmaritim
Bravo to the Uruk Team, despite the issues you faced you have done a great job ! Thanks ;-)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-06 Thread shiretoko
Since I tweaked i3 and mastered its usage, I dont want anything else anymore. It's the same with vim. At first you might think "wtf, who would ever want to use that?" but then you realize that there is nothing better out there.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-05 Thread sigdpsy
I am with uruk 2.0. I happy with it. But it tooks more ram space than uruk 1.0. my ram = 2 gb. I always prefer 64 bit. Any benefit of 32 bit Os than 64 bit?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-03 Thread Libremind
Il giorno Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:33:25 +0200 (CEST) jorgesu...@freakspot.net ha scritto: > When I execute sudo apt-get update I get the following errors or > warnings: > > W: http://packages.urukproject.org/dists/lugalbanda/InRelease: > Signature by key F094C518D6F659B7783F25866B3C79D5138BA0FE uses

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-03 Thread jorgesumle
When I execute sudo apt-get update I get the following errors or warnings: W: http://packages.urukproject.org/dists/lugalbanda/InRelease: Signature by key F094C518D6F659B7783F25866B3C79D5138BA0FE uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1) W: GPG error:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-03 Thread greatgnu
>I like LXDE or XFCE4. Openbox it is not bad stuff, but I really hate i3. wow, are you me? :)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-03 Thread mappack
FreeSlack 64 works fine for me.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-03 Thread blade . vp2020
its try to Looking for the appropriate method to build the app if it find it Will be used that way. For example Some programs build useing chmod +x configure ./configure make yes you can use it in other distributions

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-03 Thread shiretoko
I saw that you have custom tools like u-src for automated building from source. How does the program work? Can people with other distributions use it as well?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-02 Thread blade . vp2020
try guix sd its dont use systemd

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-02 Thread vitacell
Right now I have a netbook asus 900ha which is 32 bits, I installed Devuan, and it has a bit outdated packages, but works great. I love Arch, but distros based on Arch without systemd aren't so stable, and it is only x86_64. Arch based distros without systemd need a lot of work. Maybe Void

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-02 Thread .
Yes. Uruk is downstream from Trisquel Flidas which is downstream from Ubuntu Xenial Xeres which is downstream from Debian Jessie so it uses systemd. If you are looking for systemd-free alternatives, you might consider devuan, freeslack (no 32 bit support, but 64 bit looks good), and/or

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-02 Thread vitacell
I like LXDE or XFCE4. Does Uruk come with systemd?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-01 Thread i_write_words
I can try to make a private torrent for you if it gets too frustrating, but I have absolutely no experience or any language other than English much beyond the "Where is the restroom?" level so that might be even worse. Lots of bandwidth and best wishes, though.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-01 Thread sigdpsy
I am trying to download. But after 90% that crashing. Net speed slow in Bangladesh. Now I am trying again.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-01 Thread .
That was what impressed me about the alpha. I don't know what I was expecting, but I wound up giving my DVD to the daughter who had never used Gnu/Linux instead of the daughter who was getting "nice fresh .isos just like mama used to burn!" in her care package. The final LTS release is seriously

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-01 Thread handala
If I ever have to use Windows I'll know who I can confess my sins to.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-09-01 Thread handala
Have to give congratulations: as an "end user" and novice GNU/linux user, I ran Uruk from bootdisk and was very impressed. Very clean, user friendly. It actually ran better faster than Trsiquel on this old HP laptop I'm using. Great job guys. - Zem

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-31 Thread dahunt
I'm running the beta on my little netbook; it looks nearly finished. Not sure whether I can install onto my Thinkpad that has uefi; Trisquel won't boot on the thing. Interested in learning more about this guix package system the include in addition to the apt defaults.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-31 Thread sigdpsy
I waiting for final release.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-31 Thread greatgnu
Congratulations, hayder and alimiracle! Ignucius the Saint blesses your computers, long may they run!

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-31 Thread dahunt
Downloading the beta, now, and will have more to say avter I've had a look at it. Glad you've decided to return to Mate de; accessibility in Cinnamon is not ready.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-30 Thread eloi . igor
I personally struggle with the same issue. Doesn't matter how much I run, eventually I end up going back to mate. It works flawlessly. Other DE's makes me more productive, but mate is just too good. Maybe one day it will be more customizable, so one can work without the two bars easily...

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-30 Thread i_write_words
I'd have said flux or openbox instead of i3wm, but that's just because I'm old. :) Uruk is truly amazing and it's good to see you posting here. Mate is just fine. I enjoyed checking out the alpha on DVD and USB stick and look forward to seeing how far the beta has come as soon as I can.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta1)

2017-08-30 Thread happy_gnu
The best DE is no DE, I suggest you move to i3wm :) loool nah just kidding guys, congratulations for your excellent work. Uruk is awesome.