yeahyeah, it's kinda important! this is one of those things where, if you
don't stay on top of it, companies will simply default to "get it out the
door, source code drops are extra cash wasted so don't bother" mode.
Exactly. MS would rather make 'open source' software in an effort to squeeze
Oracle/Amazon/IBM our of the picture than to keep it proprietary and lose
business.
This is a power play, nothing more.
Note Microsoft never say Free software or GNU as it would push the ethics,
even when they
While that would be cool technology wise and to some degree security wise.
But that would be yet another example of why the Linux kernel should have
been moved over to GPLv3. On GPLv2 MS would still be able to ship it without
allowing people to modify their local version.
Microsoft released this to benefit Azure and not you.
> So would following the instructions on the libreboot website and not just
going with the built-in MAC address. :)
Hehe, sure, but I was more thinking of the situation where one already made
the mistake of flashing it with the built in one. Jxself santo subito :P
As I write this, I am using Uruk 32-bit edition on my laptop, having a Core 2
Duo processor and 3 gb ram; The running Mate desktop is very fast, and
applications seem to load more quickly than they would, even in the stock
Triisquel 7. I had trouble getting orca to run on my two older
MATE is better I think. It runs on old computers reasonably well and is as
easy, if not easier than GNOME Shell. And more recent versions of MATE have
GTK3 Support, and in future they plan to support Wayland. This is a good
option I think.
For the live image, go with GNOME Shell; it works and is accessible; I just
don't like all that overhead. If you can get speech and braille into the net
install, as Debian has done, and offer all the desktops, with whatever
accessibility they support, I think everyone's covered.
If you are just making an ISO of Debian packages, just changing the
installer, then it is still Debian, just with a slightly different installer.
If you plan to change all the packages that are offending, then you would
just be duplicating the efforts of gNewSense, which has few resources as
For some reason the access to the files in the "rms" subdirectory was denied.
I fixed the permissions. Notice that I got the FSF membership card yeas ago.
I hope those newest videos have replaced some of the older ones:
https://audio-video.gnu.org/video/TEDxGE2014_Stallman05_LQ.webm
It seems you now understand what I wrote in my first post. I get the
impression you want to brush off what I wrote.
>It's hypothetical.
No.
>what does it offer
No asking for non free software when you install.
Fsf approval.
This I do not know. I assume it is a smaller task to make a librian iso
"I was just providing a link to macchanger, that would have prevented what
you described previously"
So would following the instructions on the libreboot website and not just
going with the built-in MAC address. :)
Thanks
Thanks (You can use framadrop for sharing files)
> What do you want to contain in it
How do you want it to be
Based on the next Debian stable with the Pantheon DE by default. Can you do
that for me? :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lB4QDWVIMM
I have lost the Trisquel keychain. I still have the FSF membership card and
here is the free software advocacy material on it (214 MB):
http://dcc.ufmg.br/~lcerf/fsf
I can upload an archive of the whole thing if anybody wishes.
> A website you are accessing on the internet (like, say, fsf.org) has no
access to your MAC address. The place you're connecting to from would be able
to know it so a better way to say it might be that "Since it is a unique
identifier, network access points can track you from one the
XFCE will be the default
but we Thinking to make Custom iso for users nede accessible (for me I cant
use XFCE)
but I confused what to use
Hi Alimiracle ;-)
I prefer XFCE
From a general perspective GNOME Shell's large software offer and it's
ease of use is a good choice.
a Netinstall Iso with the possibility to install all Desktops Environments
would be great,doesn't mean that they all need to be ''customized as you
yes we Thinking about using it as default
but The big problem is
for me I prefer GNOME Shell
its so accessible
What is the best for you
Mate or GNOME Shell?
I haven't tried xfce lately, but last time I did, the panel and file manager
weren't accessible, though all the apps I tried seemed to be so. Xfce's nice
and fast, however, and may be the best option, for the default de, if you're
planning to accommodate light-weight systems.
Yes.
The problem is, that, if you want more powerful CPUs, you must to buy one
with microcode. Only alternatives are ARM, Core2Duo-Quad.
The Examples folder on gNewSense Deltah 2.3 contains :
fables_01_01_aesop.spx ( 229,7 kB)
GPLv2.TXT (18,0 kB )
oo-trig.xls (76,6 kB)
ForkingUbuntu.odp* (16,3 kB )
logos ( 2 items, totalling 3,4 kB )
free-software-song.ogg (326,8 kB)
oo-maxwell.odt (27,8 kB)
yes ! Can you send me this file please ?
Can you check that for me please ? If they are such document, can you send
them to me ?
Microcode isn't a malware function that can only be removed by Intel. It is a
function of the chip - how hardware instructions communicate with raw
silicon.
Even if they released source code you probably couldn't change it. It could
be malicious but you're best getting a chip designed
> Maybe an accessible login greeter, such as the one used in Trisquel?
ok
> How about an accessible net installer, such as in Debian?
we will try
> I'd suggest sticking to Mate
> 1.12, based on problem reports that latelyh come up on Sonar GNU support
forum.
its not best to use Mate
We will
27 matches
Mail list logo
