Re: [Trisquel-users] "Tehnoetic" is now Technoethical: Hooray!

2017-04-03 Thread kurtis
Glad to see that you are excited! I am as well! https://tehnoetic.com/ will  
redirect to https://technoethical.com very soon too.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread kurtis
This is good to hear Leah! I'm curious, have you considered adding 'Encrypted  
Trisquel' back to the libreboot docs?


https://libreboot.org/docs/gnulinux/encrypted_trisquel.html
https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20160925173359/https://libreboot.org/docs/gnulinux/encrypted_trisquel.html


Re: [Trisquel-users] EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread legimet . calc
But Republicans are okay with states preventing municipalities from providing  
municipal broadband. This is similar to when Texas banned cities from banning  
fracking and Michigan banned plastic bag bans. Another example of this is  
when Sean Spicer criticized Dan Malloy for not enforcing federal (not the  
state's responsibility to enforce) immigration law. Sean Spicer/Donald Trump  
are not "RINOs," they are the face of the modern Republican party.


[Trisquel-users] Re : EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread lcerf
A lot of people like to point to Europe or Japan or something, but an example  
of how much easier it is for them is Germany who has a population of 80  
million people in a land mass the size of Montana.


Take Norway.  One of the least densely populated territory in the world: 15.5  
inhabitants/km² (35 in the USA) but one of the country with the greatest  
Internet connectivity: 96.3% of the population was connected to Internet in  
2014 (73% in the USA), with the third best average speed in 2015: 18.8 Mb/s  
(8.7 in the USA).  The average cost for a 10 Mb/s connection (with unlimited  
data) is below US$ 40/month.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_in_Norway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_in_Europe_by_number_of_Internet_users
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Internet_connection_speeds#Akamai_Q4_2015_global_average_connection_speeds_rankings
https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country_result.jsp?country=Norway

Norway was one of the first country that adopted Net neutrality guidelines,  
in early 2009:  
http://eng.nkom.no/technical/internet/net-neutrality/net-neutrality/_attachment/9222


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot issues an "Open Letter to the Free Software Community"

2017-04-03 Thread calmstorm
It is possible she has many fences she needs to fix and she hasn't gotten  
around to it yet. But we shall see I guess.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread calmstorm

This is all good news, I am glad you finally made the right choice.

Don't though let the pressures of life get to you like that again.

none of us want you to go down in failure.

I hope you will stay sober.

You do have a good heart. Otherwise you wouldn't have made libreboot in the  
first place.


Not to mention supported it for so many years.  :)


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread pablofg

Thank you Leah;) Great news!


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread info
We may provide Trisquel by default again in the future, especially if we yet  
again work with the FSF for RYF certification on newer products. At present,  
Debian is the default as a matter of course (and none of the systems sold by  
Minifree are RYF certified at present; we have ditched X200/T400, in favour  
of X220 preorder since I'm working on that in Libreboot).


Of course, Minifree provides the customer the option of any distribution that  
they would like. Trisquel is a distribution.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Asus KFSN 4-DRE at the end of november 2016

2017-04-03 Thread mcz

Now I have this when trying to compile with GRUB2:
configure: error: qemu, coreboot and loongson ports need build-time  
grub-mkfont (need freetype2 library)

make[1]: *** [config] Error 1
make: *** [grub2] Erreur 2
Yet the freetype2 library (libsomething6) is already installed.

I don't mind using Seabios only if it's possible to use full-disk encryption  
like with Libreboot.


Well at least I figured out how to boot with a liveCD. Hopefully I can  
transfer the flashrom utility and the rom from a thumbdrive to the CD.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot issues an "Open Letter to the Free Software Community"

2017-04-03 Thread leoo
I'm still surprised no one out there, whether a formal company like Minifree,  
Viking, Technoethical, and Libiquity, or even just some random eBay seller,  
is yet selling any Libreboot-flashed laptop other than the Lenovos.  Nobody's  
selling:


the ASUS Chromebook C201 https://libreboot.org/docs/hcl/c201.html
the MacBook 1,1 https://libreboot.org/docs/hcl/#macbook11
or the
the Macbook 2,1 https://libreboot.org/docs/hcl/#macbook21

And while Minifree sells Libreboot desktops, nobody is selling a  
Libreboot-flashed example of this:


the iMac 5,2 https://libreboot.org/docs/hcl/imac52.html

If it weren't so darn difficult to do, I'd do it myself.  But putting  
Libreboot on something is a whole different deal thus just installing a Linux  
distro, let alone a fully free one, on a given PC.


Also, and separately from the Libreboot issue, I'm curious that there's  
nobody out there selling a Netbook with Trisquel Mini pre-installed on it,  
although I know Libiquity offers Trisquel Mini as a non-default option on  
their Lenovos, which are not netbooks.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread leoo
That is a relief. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread abnorml
Interesting! I am curious if the offended party which lead Leah to be so  
upset to begin with got a pay out or something. The FSF's accounts are public  
right, I'm curious to see when their budget for this year is disclosed how  
much they pay out for discrimination. Of course, two of the people who had  
fingers pointed at them are leaving the FSF now...


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
By saying "Now I see how great is the idea behind the GPL.", I hope he
means in good/friendly sense. Otherwise, he might have seen a case of
wrong license compliance or wrong license enforcement.
-- 
- [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]]
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
  gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre, por isso não uso. Iguais a ele prefiro
  Ring, ou Tox. Quer outras formas de contato? Adicione o vCard que
  está no endereço acima aos teus contatos.
- Pretende me enviar arquivos .doc, .ppt, .cdr, ou .mp3? OK, eu
  aceito, mas não repasso. Entrego apenas em formatos favoráveis ao
  /software/ livre. Favor entrar em contato em caso de dúvida.
- "People said I should accept the world. Bullshit! I don't accept the
  world."
 --- Richard Stallman


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread eliotime3000
OK. I understand that a misundertand can complicate any relationship.  
Specially, if are well-made rumours.


However, many times we can do choices that even can affect many important  
relationships and the reputation of projects like Libreboot. I've been  
whitness of this kind of issues; specially, with XScreensaver case, which  
Zawinski acted like a douchebag stalking to the Debian developers to keep the  
nagware of "update now or GTFO", stuff that fortunately has not been  
accomplished.


https://www.jwz.org/blog/2016/04/i-would-like-debian-to-stop-shipping-xscreensaver/
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819703 (please check the  
flame replies)

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/x/xscreensaver/xscreensaver_5.30-1+deb8u2_changelog

I hope that the next time that any software developer wants to judge to  
anyone about the contribution and/or authoring of source code, please read  
this message that I want to quote:


"The situation is very simple in fact. Somebody just lost the ground and
cannot see the difference between the free software authorship, credit
for it and property rights no more. He accepts the free license but in a
some strange one-way fashion: to get the freedom for himself and to take
it away from the others. Just like terrorists do. Setting timebombs and
objecting others to disable those bombs is not only the violation of
free software license as up to me, but also it spoils the idea of the
free software itself. Now I see how great is the idea behind the GPL."

Melleus  @ message #200 in bug #819703 of Debian bug report logs

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819703;msg=200

Thanks by understand us.

Eliot.


Re: [Trisquel-users] EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread enduzzer

Emphasis on colluding to remove competition.

You can bypass surveillance to an extent but you can't choose from  
monopolies.


Re: [Trisquel-users] EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread elkingrey
The real bogey men of internet spying are Google, Facebook and FedGov, not  
the ISP's. The ISP's really couldn't care less about your traffic usage,  
except when FedGov makes them go after DMCA violations, etc.


Furthermore, ISP's are easy to beat with VPN and Tor. It's the services that  
you log into or require javascript to run you've got to watch out for.


All I'm saying is that this repeal is not "the Republicans selling out your  
privacy" like it's been billed as. It's a little more complicated than that.


That being said, it's not like "the Republicans" aren't *known* for selling  
out your privacy. Just like the Dems, they're both guilty of being  
disrespectful of our privacy. But this is one case where they've done a good  
thing. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread elkingrey
I know it's huge. That's why I cut these companies some slack if or when they  
agree "you go here and we'll go there and cover more people instead of  
competing over the same small scraps."


A lot of people like to point to Europe or Japan or something, but an example  
of how much easier it is for them is Germany who has a population of 80  
million people in a land mass the size of Montana.


Where I live, it's miles and miles and miles in between very small towns and  
neighborhoods. There are many parts not far from where I live that have no  
internet service at all, unless they want to do satellite.


And even satellite is hampered by laws such as fair access doctrine. For  
example, I would gladly pay quadruple for internet if I could get quadruple  
the amount of GB every month. But nope, I'm not allowed to. Meanwhile, my  
neighbor who uses the internet 5 minutes a day to check her email pays the  
same amount as me and uses but a fraction of the bandwidth I do. So, instead  
of getting faster internet through satellite, I get slower, but unlimited,  
internet through DSL.


If you really want awesome internet, it's in your best interest to get  
government out of the situation as much as possible. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread enduzzer
"...mega-corps are in bed with the government and spy on us and collude to  
remove market competition."


It's exactly why they want net neutrality to be scrapped.


Re: [Trisquel-users] I've started a Patreon page

2017-04-03 Thread onpon4
This is untrue. CloudFlare doesn't block Tor users; it just requires them to  
complete a CAPTCHA. The CAPTCHA used to be broken in non-JavaScript mode, but  
it works just fine now as long as you're properly blocking it (i.e. not using  
LibreJS). I just tested it; I was able to look at my Patreon page through Tor  
Browser just fine (though of course, I had to switch the security level to  
"medium" to see the actual page; this is unrelated to anything CloudFlare  
does).


> Anyway, isn't it better to donate directly to you instead on relying on a  
middleman that will charge you more fees, resulting in less money reaching  
you?


Patreon charges contributors' cards on a monthly basis rather than just once,  
so that's the advantage. It's a steady stream of contributions, more similar  
to Trisquel or FSF membership than donations.


But yeah, if Patreon is something you can't or won't use, sending me money  
directly would be helpful, too. I have a public Bitcoin address  
(bitcoin:1Ko772jMW2ZDXaPT4Pi9VYi8612eSXCxfU), and there's also my PayPal  
account (onp...@riseup.net).


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot issues an "Open Letter to the Free Software Community"

2017-04-03 Thread tct
I haven't received an apology from Leah. I have received an apology from  
Alyssa for Leah's behaviour.


Re: [Trisquel-users] I've started a Patreon page

2017-04-03 Thread jorgesumle
I don't like that Patreon blocks Tor users because it uses CloudFlare. I hate  
CloudFlare:  
https://people.torproject.org/~lunar/20160331-CloudFlare_Fact_Sheet.pdf  
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/trouble-cloudflare


Anyway, isn't it better to donate directly to you instead on relying on a  
middle-man that will charge you more fees, resulting in less money reaching  
you?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot issues an "Open Letter to the Free Software Community"

2017-04-03 Thread jorgesumle
Only admins of Libreboot repository can edit issues of other people, so I  
guess that was made by Leah or someone else with admin roles. It should be a  
matter of looking at the log registry of the database of NotABug to find out  
who did this, so I don't know why he/she did that, it's a very childish  
attitude. If your ticked has been played with (and you didn't do that  
yourself), I hope to see an apology from the Libreboot repository admins.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread greatgnu

Keep up the excellent work you've been doing all these years, Leah!!


Re: [Trisquel-users] Hardware: cheap Intel config?

2017-04-03 Thread vitacell
The northbridge is very very hot, bit I still had no problems. Be sure to  
clean NB and put quality thermal paste on the chip. Yes, this board is about  
30-50€ used. Don't forget to purchase Xeon x5460, the best CPU for that  
board you can buy.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Hardware: cheap Intel config?

2017-04-03 Thread vitacell
The PCIe GPU works fine as OpenGL render with DRI3, but it doesn't work as  
primary GPU.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Hardware: cheap Intel config?

2017-04-03 Thread vitacell
This gigabyte board runs much better with Xeon x5460, but needs a minimun  
quality cooler. And x5460 costs about 20€. Be careful if you want to flash  
that board by hardware. Also this board works fine with only one main spi  
chip (without backup one).


Re: [Trisquel-users] Hardware: cheap Intel config?

2017-04-03 Thread vitacell
The problem of A20 computer card is GPU, other things are seems to be  
perfect.


[Trisquel-users] Re : Proposed Project: GOLD - Gaming on Linux Distribution

2017-04-03 Thread lcerf
You are right: "entitled" is the not the proper word.  The question is  
whether the author who wants to negotiate something with the blog/distro (or  
refuse the commercial use) is mistreating her audience.  My answer is no,  
hence my acceptance of the NC clause.


[Trisquel-users] Re : EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread lcerf
Sorry if that was not clear Net neutrality does not aim to be an antitrust  
act.  Those are two separate topics.  But I deem essential to have laws  
against against both problems.


The investment for a third company to come in and compete is huge.   
Especially is the existing ISP refuses to rent its cables. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Proposed Project: GOLD - Gaming on Linux Distribution

2017-04-03 Thread jason

"entitled"?

http://questioncopyright.org/compensation


[Trisquel-users] Libreboot no longer opposes the Trisquel project

2017-04-03 Thread info

Hi,

We have made peace with the FSF and GNU project, on our end. See:

https://libreboot.org/unity/

For avoidance of doubt, the same willingness to resume cooperation also  
applies to Trisquel, not just the FSF.


I personally wish this project well. Libreboot's website no longer negative  
mentions Trisquel.


~Leah


Re: [Trisquel-users] Libreboot issues an "Open Letter to the Free Software Community"

2017-04-03 Thread jabjabs
Next time I speak with Zammit I will see what his take on it is. So far great  
news!


[Trisquel-users] Re : Question about Free GNU/Linux distributions

2017-04-03 Thread lcerf

I look forward to reading better arguments in the future.  :-)


[Trisquel-users] Re : Proposed Project: GOLD - Gaming on Linux Distribution

2017-04-03 Thread lcerf
Even in the case you list at the end, shouldn't the authors be entitled to  
negotiate something (a fixed amount or a percentage on the money the  
distro/article raises)?


Re: [Trisquel-users] EFF: Senate Puts ISP Profits Over Your Privacy

2017-04-03 Thread elkingrey
Then what's stopping a third company from coming in and competing? Or what's  
to stop neighborhood or community co-ops from owning the last mile?


I understand the frustration here. I live in the middle of nowhere and I only  
have one provider as an option. And it's slow-ass DSL. I would love to have  
cable internet.


I want the internet that people in San Francisco get, but in reality, that's  
not going to happen. It takes time. Rome isn't built in a day, and letting  
FedGov get involved isn't going to make anything better. Let's work on  
finding real solutions instead of empowering a bureaucracy (which is subject  
to regulatory capture).


Re: [Trisquel-users] Hardware: cheap Intel config?

2017-04-03 Thread superbyelich
I too have not run into any Dell laptops yet that don't allow you to change  
the wifi adapter.  I have in fact run in to a few Hewlett-Packard laptops  
that have a restriction.