Re: [Trisquel-users] Node.js free?

2018-01-26 Thread csh
Is that the proprietary Impact typeface?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Extended-Term Support

2018-01-26 Thread calmstorm
Please make this available for arm in the future... eoma68-a20 + ETS kernel = awesome!

[Trisquel-users] Re : Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread lcerf
Trisquel 7 now has Abrowser 58, based on the same version of Firefox, released two days ago.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread studio
When I tested for the first time in late December FF52 and 57 behaved the same. I have been thinking about the same about Tor but I think this may not work correctly because in Tor things seem more complicated. Perhaps there are additional (Tor specific) about:config variables which don't

Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8 taking so long

2018-01-26 Thread Mason Hock
Many proprietary packages can be simply removed. Others may be need to be modified or replaced. For example, any proprietary firmware removed should be replaced with with free firmware when available so that as many devices as possible are supported. Another example is SMPLayer, which in Ubuntu

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread Mason Hock
What version of Trisquel are you using? When I used T7 I found Icecat to be slow compared to Abrowser, possibilty due to its extra plugins like LibreJS. The version of Abrowser in Trisquel 8 is based on FF57, so it's much faster now.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread Mason Hock
I basically agreed with this when you wrote it. Since then the situation has progressed and I'm reevaluating a few points. You may turn out to have been right on all points anyway, but I'm going to see how things play out before I make a conclusion. Your other post about Tor Browser is

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread www
I don't no, but clarified my doubt. IceCat 52.3 is more current than abrowser 56 ^^ (besides being faster)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8 taking so long

2018-01-26 Thread william_lauritzen
Thanks mason that explains some issues but is there a more technical explanation as to why it isn't so simple as to just remove proprietary bits.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread danieldorado
I noticed that IceCat is pretty faster than Abrowser on my computer. Why is that?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread www
I don't read the whole topic but this post was enough to remind me why I use abrowser until today. However, for some weeks some pages are progressively stopping the 56.0 version used in the abrowser. Youtube was the first to show notification, followed by Facebook (both allow STILL use).

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread studio
> Pretty sure that one is the one that controls the entire thingy. Considering everything discussed so far - I wonder how you can be pretty sure (or even just sure) about any thingy without testing :)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread greatgnu
>Encrypted smoke signals. How 'bout dem piins?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser

2018-01-26 Thread greatgnu
>network.allow-experiments;true The incredibly idiotic feature is disabled though. experiments.enabled is set to false Pretty sure that one is the one that controls the entire thingy.