>Trisquel as Ubuntu clone is user-friendly but is not good optimized. Please,
any info you'll get will be quite useful.
netinstall and manually install only the DE.. LXDE?
Trisquel as Ubuntu clone is user-friendly but is not good optimized. Please,
any info you'll get will be quiet useful.
I just ran some tests, with a clock timer and systemd-analyze. Here are the
results.
No battery on laptop, only straight AC power outlet
systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 10.333s (kernel) + 26.091s (userspace) = 36.425s
My clock counts 58 seconds (including the time it takes for me to type
I just ran systemd-analyze again and got this
Startup finished in 11.289s (kernel) + 30.593s (userspace) = 41.882s
Wtf?
The only thing I noticed different was that I was not running the laptop on
battery but straight for the AC outlet. Does that even matter? I guess I will
have to give it a
Would disabling some of those services prevent the booting of the system? As
long as I can "systemctl disable / systemctl enable" I am okay with that.
What would help then? Is there anything that can make the kernel load faster,
or the only option is a)replacing the kernel b)buying SSD ?
Also, if you can offer some input to the questions I posed below, I would be
very grateful (meaning the Ofono service and such). Thanks.
I cannot know exactly cause I see names there for a first time now: gdomap,
irqbalance, acpid, atd, setvtrgb, remote-fs-pre, nss-user-lookup.
You should have rescue usb flash to boot with it, to mount broken system
and reconfigure it.
disabling ofono, openvpn is ok. disabling avahi is ok
Ok, so, running systemctl list-units I noticed some things:
ofono.service loaded active running oFono Mobile telephony stack
openvpn.service loaded active exitedOpenVPN service
avahi-daemon.socket loaded active running Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Stack Acti
As far as I am aware, I don't use
you know I disabled tor service and tor@default service and my systemd says
this:
# systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 13.233s (kernel) + 2.998s (userspace) = 16.231s
This means minus 16 seconds from userspace as in my previous post. Now I
search how to move this and other services loading
>But you almost make me want to change for Debian again, lol, that is a great
boot time.
Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends, it's called install, set
and forget. :)
rfkill loads on boot and take a time. you can see it. needs to try to
configure os with no soft blocking necessary interfaces and disabling rfkill.
also networkmanager takes time on boot process. but there are faster
alternatives I think. I was using wpa_supplicant and had much joy about it.
Thanks! Just noticed I had my updates disabled, so I decided to update my
system. Who knows, maybe the kernel updates make it faster?
Thanks man. Yes, SSD would make huge difference, but I suspect there are
things I can disable. I will have to try and discover how to disable certain
items AND get them back up if I need to.
What did you mean about NetworkManager? Thanks.
I have ssd, Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU N3530 @ 2.16GHz, 4Gb RAM and I think my
system boots fast. Faster then on Funtoo, Debian that I used before.
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 13.248s (kernel) + 19.747s (userspace) = 32.995s
I think to disable unnecessary services, disable kernel
Yes it was directed at you... So the kernel is different... Too bad, can't
make a proper comparison. But you almost make me want to change for Debian
again, lol, that is a great boot time.
Guess I will wait for MagicBanana to reply, I am curious if everyone is
having the same long boot
I assume the question is directed to me - I'm running and been running for
over 3 yrs now Debian Stable.
Are you running Trisquel 8 with the standard installation kernel? Or another
Linux-Libre flavour?
Thanks.
Are you running Trisquel 8 with the standard installation kernel? Or another
Linux-Libre flavour?
Thanks.
>my hard drive is a 7200rpm one. Could it be because I have full disk
encryption?
FDE here too and a 7200rpm HD..
/me sends MagiqueB all his bitcoins :)
*which is not much..I'm an europoor :'(
Ah ah ah. Tempting, but that still doesn't explain why my kernel takes 39
seconds to boot (kernel alone). Though I would maybe think about getting an
SSD later.
Are you using the standard Trisquel 8 kernel, or is it another Linux-Libre
(maybe the one provided by jxself?).
Thanks.
Thanks for the info. I ran that command and got this
graphical.target @25.604s
└─multi-user.target @25.604s
└─unbound.service @25.263s +340ms
└─network-online.target @25.249s
└─NetworkManager-wait-online.service @19.048s +6.199s
└─NetworkManager.service @16.612s +2.415s
That's what I consider really strange. Mine is a Librebooted T400, with a
brand new fresh Trisquel 8 installation, with a 7200rpm hard drive.
I don't understand why it takes so long... You take 40 secs I take more than
a minute.
Startup finished in 18.434s (kernel) + 21.112s (userspace) = 39.546s
This is an 11 yr old laptop btw..
Send me bitcoins
Thanks everyone!
Great stuff on all posts!
I run systemd-analyze blame and got this:
Startup finished in 39.857s (kernel) + 40.379s (userspace) = 1min 20.236s
7.381s apt-daily-upgrade.service
7.179s dev-sda1.device
6.760s apt-daily.service
6.329s
nice
LOL xD
Thanks. I didn't know anything about that, I knew systemD was the default (I
remember the heated discussions back then...) but I didn't know much about
it. Those commands will allow me to make some analysis and hopefully some
improvements (or at least make sure that over time stuff is not
I believe systemd is installed by default.
Here are a couple of commands with example responses from my laptop running
Trisquel 8:
rally@silverbird:~/Desktop$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 7.907s (kernel) + 25.403s (userspace) = 33.311s
rally@silverbird:~/Desktop$ systemd-analyze
Install systemD, d only system there is, it will make your computer cumm
faster \o/
30 matches
Mail list logo
