Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-26 Thread greatgnu
about:config Variable:/Value: general.useragent.override Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 general.appname.overrideNetscape general.appversion.override 5.0 (Windows) general.oscpu.override Windows NT 6.1 general.platform.override Win32

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-25 Thread calmstorm
hmm I knew not this... I wouldn't know how to do this though... but I am sure you do. heh.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-23 Thread greatgnu
>well, I checked seamonkey's security compared to firefox, on panoptclick and jondofox, it is kind of embarrassing how easily it gets tracked. meh... not sure why. > Fingerprinting has nothing to do with "security". My Seamonkey has the same fingerprint of my TorBB. Just fake the useragent

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-23 Thread calmstorm
That makes sense actually... what a pity.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-23 Thread onpon4
Pretty simple, really: not very many people use SeaMonkey.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-23 Thread calmstorm
well, I checked seamonkey's security compared to firefox, on panoptclick and jondofox, it is kind of embarrassing how easily it gets tracked. meh... not sure why.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-22 Thread greatgnu
Yes, but there are several liners that are present in FF and not in Seamonkey, but that's not a problem for those will be just sitting there doing nothing during the execution of the browser. It works, I tested it.. Only thing, I also "turn off google" which is enabled in that profile for

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-22 Thread calmstorm
are the settings the same in seamonkey as firefox? Also, what needs to be done specifically to fix seamonkey to be free software?

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-22 Thread greatgnu
>privacy settings addon https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js/

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread calmstorm
You are Correct.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread calmstorm
I wonder if someone could make privacy settings addon work on seamonkey... that would help tremendously...

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread calmstorm
Very good question... I would say, probably not due to the fact that I don't know what options need to be ticked and what things need to be done to it... also, privacy settings addon isn't available in that browser sadly...

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread onpon4
If I'm not mistaken, it stopped being maintained due to lack of interest.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread dahunt
What happened to Debian's fork called iceape? I'e used the monkey in other distros, and like it.

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread greatgnu
Calmstorm - please do package it for us, it's a great browsy :) I use it on my older laptop exclusively, it's so much faster than FF. On my newer laptop I use FF-esr, it performs well, well unless there are several heavy gifs on the page (I'm thinking diaspora* right now). Seamonkey is the

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-21 Thread tomlukeywood
I tried to compile it a while ago and failed perhaps because the demand is not there and its difficult to do. has anyone been successful in compiling it here?

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-20 Thread onpon4
It isn't. It's an entirely different program. Firefox diverged from Mozilla years ago, and SeaMonkey is just the modern version of Mozilla, which itself was derived from Netscape. Very little is similar between Firefox and SeaMonkey at this point. If anything, Firefox from its inception

Re: [Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-20 Thread jason
Are you offering to do that work?

[Trisquel-users] If Seamonkey is really firefox without the bloat,

2017-03-20 Thread calmstorm
why doesn't debian or trisquel or ubuntu sponsor a version of it in their repositories. just curious...