Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-31 Thread cave . linguam . 94
I just did an installation of parabola yesterday. The install.sh didn't work, but otherwise it was fine. But now I am back to Trisquel again.

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-31 Thread commodore256
>Does it really have to be in your house, or are you just exaggerating to hammer home the point about Discord? I suppose it's part exaggeration to make a point, but on the same token, you are trusting somebody else and there's no real way to see if they hold your values to heart like the

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-31 Thread commodore256
I tried parabola and it wouldn't even install.

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-30 Thread strypey
You do have the option of adding the repos for Trisquel 9.0 to your source.list for a "testing experience". If you'd like to help with backporting newer versions of packages into Trisquel repos, Chaosmonk gave some detailed instructions here:

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-30 Thread strypey
> "It's not 'your' server, if it was your server, the server would be located in your house" I agree that a Discord community is not a "server". But it sounds like you don't count a VPS as "your server" either? What about a box they own, sitting in leased space in a datacentre? Or a colo?

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-30 Thread mason
> new gNewSense hasn't come yet. The new project leader seems ambitious. > Let's look forward to its first release. Since making that initial announcement and migrating gNewSense's old code to a Gitlab instance, there appears to have been no activity.[1] [1] https://git.gnu.io/gnewsense

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-30 Thread xliang9550
Old gNewSense has been discontinued for a few years, and new gNewSense hasn't come yet. The new project leader seems ambitious. Let's look forward to its first release. Hopefully, the "developer" edition would be based on testing or sid. If gNewSense could maintain certain important

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread commodore256
Yeah if Eric Swartz can do that in 1995 with 4MB of RAM, trisquel could do this no problem. Hell, the best animation was all done analog and the best animators today have a very analog mindset even though they're using digital tools.

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread Caleb Herbert
On 10/29/2019 07:55 PM, commodore...@gmail.com wrote: > Reminds me of this short made in the 90's on an Amiga. > https://invidio.us/watch?v=Sj9Lxu-pO6g Wow, that's really impressive! Thanks for sharing this. <>

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread commodore256
That made me think if there was a cartoon short about a Trisquel User watching Twitch in mpv and as soon as they turn on Javascript, their PC bursts into flames. Oh that would be funny. Reminds me of this short made in the 90's on an Amiga. https://invidio.us/watch?v=Sj9Lxu-pO6g

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread commodore256
and maybe with musl too. Alpine Linux uses musl and it's pretty fast. eglibc hasn't been updated in 5 years, so since then debian moved to glibc. So I think it would be cool if Trisquel used musl, it would use less RAM and it would remove temptations to install non-free software like

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread Caleb Herbert
On 10/29/2019 11:06 AM, stry...@disintermedia.net.nz wrote: > To be honest though, the single biggest improvement in performance came > when I started using NoScript (no more freezes and crashes!). I thought I was the only one whose laptop crashed! One time I got lazy and didn't feel like

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread commodore256
>The modern web really is an hellscape of lazily engineering and often user-abusing Javascript. Oh, yes, I can't stand the modern web. Funny enough you can run some modern websites without Javascript like old.reddit.com or m.facebook.com. >Given your knowledge of hardware, I assume you

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread Narcis Garcia
You talk about something like gNewSense. El 29/10/19 a les 17:13, xliang9...@live.cn ha escrit: > Trisquel is great except that the packages are outdated. If there were a > Debian-testing-based, semi-rolling edition, that would be perfect.

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread xliang9550
Trisquel is great except that the packages are outdated. If there were a Debian-testing-based, semi-rolling edition, that would be perfect.

Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread strypey
Hi commodore256, thanks for sharing your experiences, and particularly the fine detail on the hardware. You obviously go to much greater lengths on this score than I do. I just do the absolute minimum with the hardware that allows the OS to boot without crashing and hope for the best ;)

[Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

2019-10-29 Thread commodore256
First, I want to say my hardware specs aren't optimal, I just really wanted to get going and my tube of thermal paste is spent after putting the cooler on to test it. My CPU us a Pentium 2.7ghz with 2MB of L2 Cache and can only support SSE3 and I only have 2GB of RAM installed. That is