Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2015-03-31 Thread dzmitry . lahoda
I see that Open Watcom is Open source http://www.openwatcom.org/index.php/Main_Page. But http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watcom_C/C%2B%2B_compiler#License_considerations ``` The GNU project considers the Open Watcom license nonfree because It requires you to publish the source code publicly

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2015-03-31 Thread tomlukeywood
I bad that VBox not goes open source version 4.1 and before are libre open source just to be clear libre software is different from open source open source software is software that has some source code available libre software has these freedoms https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2015-03-31 Thread onpon4
They're usually the same; the Open Source Definition is indirectly derived from the Free Software Definition, even. Open Watcom is just one of the occasional examples where it's open source, but not libre. (The FSF doesn't approve of it because it restricts certain types of private use.)

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-08 Thread t8mf4nu6lizp
Send them email and let them know how you (we) think. I think all kind of feedback is important.

[Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread tomlukeywood
when i was using debian i used to use virtualbox thinking it was libre software but i noticed it was not in trisquels software center. so i went on the virtualbox website and its license was gpl v2 so i am confused is virtualbox libre or not?

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread jason
Starting with version 4.2 compiling the BIOS used by VirtualBox requires the Open Watcom compiler, which is non-free. Since it cannot be compiled using free software, it's not included in Trisquel 7. Trisquel 6 still has the old version though. Also, this shows why merely looking at the

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread tomlukeywood
thanks but if i used a version of virtualbox before 4.2 that would be free software?

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread onpon4
Virtualbox recently started requiring a proprietary compiler to build the BIOS recently (since version 4.2). Debian stable probably still has an older version that didn't have this requirement. I'm not aware of any fork continuing development of the older version of VirtualBox that didn't

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread jason
Sure, assuming you also avoid the guest additions thing.

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread noordinaryspider
Gnome-boxes is also in the repositories and might be worth a try. I'm finding it much faster than Aqemu was and it might be possible to import your existing VMs if you are patient, comfortable in command line, and have enough hard drive space and an existing Virtualbox install.

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread legimet . calc
Or install the free version of guest additions (which is packaged in Trisquel 6.0 for example, as virtualbox-guest-*) But KVM is a better choice.

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread legimet . calc
With Debian Jessie, Virtualbox was moved to contrib. Wheezy has an older version in main.

Re: [Trisquel-users] is Virtualbox non-free software?

2014-12-07 Thread tomlukeywood
Thanks for your replys i think ill stop using virtualbox its a shame as its good software i think ill use a program like gnome-boxes or qemu that respects freedom more.