Paul says that if you break one
segment of the law, you have broken all. Peter says no Jew has ever been able
to keep the whole thing, The Bible makes it clear that the law cannot save
us, only condemn us.
Peter said no
Jew was able to acquire his own salvation; you have misunderstood. Why
I was a little loose in my dates...the early date is c. 65 AD
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Myths, Lies, Half-Truths
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:56:20 -0700
Izzy, preterism is the idea that all of prophecy
In a message dated 10/10/2004 11:12:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Terry, I came across another passage that lends itself to the "orividence " of God
Phil. 1: 19
JD
I am glad for you John, but have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Do you make up words to
In a message dated 10/10/2004 12:38:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So Slade steals my next argument! Thanx buddy! But the question of the meaning of Acts 15:21 remains unanswered. I suppose that it is because the church cannot answer it without rejecting some of it's own
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/10/2004 12:38:15
PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So
Slade steals my next argument! Thanx buddy! But the question of the
meaning of Acts 15:21 remains unanswered. I suppose that it is because
the church cannot
1.What translation is
this?
2. How does this answer my
question?
Theologians, Jewish and Gentile, all agree
that at the time of the writing of the NT "Christianity" was Jewish, a sect of
Judaism. It would be many years to come before the "church" split from it's
Jewish roots. Deny the
Terry's response in bold.
Slade Henson wrote:
Paul says that if you break one segment of the law, you have
broken all. Peter says no Jew has ever been able
to keep the whole thing, The Bible makes it clear that the law cannot
save us, only condemn us.
Peter said no Jew was
One
thing you said I agree with, Terry. You said you don't have to keep Torah and
neither does any Christian. That is correct. No one HAS to do anything. Besides
that, there is nothing else I can agree with. You see and I hear and we cannot
communicate in this realm... much like Helen
Slade Henson wrote:
One thing you said I agree with, Terry. You said
you don't have to keep Torah and neither does any Christian. That is
correct. No one HAS to do anything. Besides that, there is nothing else
I can agree with. You see and I hear and we cannot communicate in this
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:56:24 -0400 "Slade Henson"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Do you interpret Scripture to make it culturally relevant to
you?
no
dominated by
prophecy inc that of, e.g., Moses, and fulfillment ofthat prophecy, the
Scripture creates a (suffering) culture of its
Perry, I can certainly understand why you would believe the way you do. I
see nothing in scripture that goes firmly one way or the other. I assume
God left it a mystery until He chooses to make it clear. Either way, I
concern myself with how I live my life, rather than understanding Revelation
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004
5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
providence
In a message dated 10/10/2004 11:12:07 AM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004
12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Republican or Democrat
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Jeff, I didnt know Terry made the
joke first. Sorry. I consider
John, I realize this would take you more
time, however Id appreciate it if when you write the address of a
scripture that you would also quote the scripture. Then you could
elucidate further on what you mean about each of the four restrictions. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that one thing being left out of the
equation below is that since Messiah came we have the indwelling of the Holy
Spirit which now makes it POSSIBLE for Believers to obey the Law, if they so
choose. What do you think of that? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
In a message dated 10/10/2004 5:10:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/10/2004 12:38:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So Slade steals my next argument! Thanx buddy! But the question of the meaning of Acts
In a message dated 10/10/2004 5:15:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. What translation is this? My comments below were offered as an answer to the question. "what does Acts 15:21 mean.
2. How does this answer my question? Have you actually read 15:21. YES, Have you?
In a message dated 10/10/2004 8:38:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perry, I can certainly understand why you would believe the way you do. I
see nothing in scripture that goes firmly one way or the other. I assume
God left it a mystery until He chooses to make it clear.
however subtle the
'encouragement', below, jt,certain people know better--e.g., the Ap.
Peteractually portrays 'godliness' as an eschatological reality, not as a moral dilemma
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:54:45 -0400 Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
the problem is with Dobson and
In a message dated 10/10/2004 8:39:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dang. I gots to get this prrof readig down to aas art form.
Jhon
I think you have already managed that, John. J Izzy
Yes , I beldieve I se you're point.
In a message dated 10/10/2004 8:41:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, I realize this would take you more time, however Id appreciate it if when you write the address of a scripture that you would also quote the scripture. Then you could elucidate further on what you mean
however subtle the
'encouragement', below, jt,certain people know better--e.g., the Ap.
Peteractually portrays 'godliness' as an eschatological reality (of God's people), not as
apartisanpersonal puritanical preference
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:54:45 -0400 Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
22 matches
Mail list logo
