In a message dated 6/6/2005 10:35:13 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perry the Clown wrote to Blaine: PRODUCE THE PHOTOS [of perry the
clown] OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY COUNTENANCE!Looks
like the mormon boys are tag-teaming me. But, I must confess. I
In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Whoa,
Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective heartburn
feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you
IFF the object of my/your 'faith/belief' is other
than our perception then, how and, in what way(s) does that matter? As I've
'read' you for some time now, I've seen you as one with the capacity to identify
'meaning'. Do you know what I mean? I shall not evade 'your'
question.
-
How would they know if theyve never
tried? Anyway, proof-texting is a term THEY use to shoot down
scripture quoters. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:39
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
And the RCC adopted them as canon
to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:16
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
JD
Probably because its downright
funny!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:31
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Street preachers just quote what it
says. Izzy
It's about as funny as it would be for you and your
Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or
Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of
the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'!
-
Two issues arise:
1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from
'them'?
2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by
those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The
'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To:
You jest! This is not Perry - it's a clown
wearing Ruben and the other SP's John 3:16 wig.
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PRODUCE THE PHOTOS OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY
COUNTENANCE! DAVEH: Can it be an AH attack if there are
pictures to prove it, Perry. :-D Charles
'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the
Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did
you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent
appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they
quote.
- Original
1. Purgatory is one that is taken from 1 or 2
Macc- Izzy being a redeemed rc probably knows more
2. The rapture is one interpretation among others, it
is not declared canon by the rcc or anyone else.
Let's face it Lance - your Bishop has
erred.
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:20:05 -0400 "Lance Muir"
After hearing them once who would payany mind to
what Michael Moore and John Kerry have to say?
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the
Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did
you respond when they did it? One
Subject: The cat
who went to Heaven
A cat died and went to Heaven. God met her at Heaven's door and said
you have been a good cat all of these Years, anything you want, is
yours for the asking. The cat thought for a moment, and then said
all
my life I lived on a
To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor -
it's a cultural thing Lance.
Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the
prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting
on the toilet?
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL
MY POINT HERE HAD TO DO WITH THE FINE ART OF
'proof-texting' not with either of these two gentlemen or, with politics, where
such takes place on a daily basis. It also takes place herein (TT).
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
As to #2, Judy, whether the 'rapture doctrine'
serves best to illustrate my point or not, that heretical doctrines arise in
greater numbers from the canon itself, THAT WAS MY POINT. It was a 'non-rcc'
point. Believers do the same thing with the non-apocryphal
scriptures.
- Original
Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the ones I
think you will be able to answer:
1. Is the witness of the spirit to which you referred the burning in the
bosom that mormons say they get as a witness?
2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning
Blaine, I have no link. Maybe Dave has it. The photo was attached to Dave's
original message. If you have that just open the email and clock download
at the bottom of hte mail page (I presume you receive TT mail via your AOL
account?).
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
DAVEH:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.robotfactory.com/Characters/images/clown.jpgimgrefurl=http://www.robotfactory.com/Characters/pages/clown.htmh=350w=393sz=23tbnid=-Yu1K99TeLAJ:tbnh=106tbnw=120hl=enstart=92prev=/images%3Fq%3Dclown%26start%3D80%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN
Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own
type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that
profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag,
the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds
Oh, Blaine, if you took my response as serious, thinking the picture really
is of me in a clown suit, then you did not catch the gist of my jest. Dave
just forwarded some photo he got somehwere, most likely on the web, and
posted it as though it was me. I was just playing along. But, still feel
He already answered these. James 1:5 fg/
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 07, 2005 09:01
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the ones
I
I guess it depends upon your perspective.
To me mormon underwear is not a sacred thing (but a silly thing!). Maybe it is
to you. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:17
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Actually I am not a former RCC. My
parents were RCC and my brother. It never took with me. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:27
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Matthew Mark, Luke, bel the Dragon?
only in the Catholic counterfiets!
You left out first and second Ralph.
Before you get carried away here Lance, I seem to
recall that not so long ago you referred to me on this public internet list as
'one funny broad' - and as a child of God I find this term offensive; are you
aware of it'sorigin? - if not I will enlighten you (this is from Plateau
Press.com):
Lance your comment is irrelevant to the discussion.
Izzy
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'Proof-texting' can apply to more
than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis
GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote
Lance, FYI: It isnt sacred if God
doesnt say it is sacred. Somebody thinking it is doesnt make it
so. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:10
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Oh sorry about that Iz, good for you. BTW has
anyone seen Christine - missing her. jt
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:22:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Actually I am not a
former RCC. My parents were RCC and my brother. It never took with
me. Izzy
From:
Judy, I believe that Lance is the one who
coined the term in 1914, so youll just have to forgive him. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:25
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
Amen. Let's send Canada! Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:29 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The World Takes Care of It's Own
People don't starve because
So what does Blaine have to say for
himself?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:17
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Myth - It
Rev
2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to
them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy,
God will take away his part from the tree of life
Sure makes me think its all about
JSmith and the BoM. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:27
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
I see you have not
In addition, "proof-texting" is the misuse of scripture. All ae suspectible to this failure. We look for verses with similar wording and assume those passages have the same meaning and context.-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7
Then why watch them? J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:18
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
In the movies sometimes they don't care
about what God said.
The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do suchthings no longer care about those whom they insult.
JD-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:09:42
You persist in missing Lance's point.
There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue with that line of debate and you are wasting time.
JD
Matthew 4:4
Wisdom 16:26
Matthew 4:15
1 Maccabees 5:15
Matthew 5:18
How did you respond when they did it?
Better question. How did you respond when Jesus did it?
"IT IS WRITTEN" JesusLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond
The more important question IMO is "what did this word "bible" mean to the Apostle John in 98 AD.
JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Rev 2218I testify
Thanks JD, I appreciate the effort. Like a good Berean - I will check
them all out and compare. jt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You persist in missing Lance's point.
There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No
one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue
Does thisapplyto yourself JD, or is it just
for "others"? Do you think DM is humored every time he is
referred to as legalistic and a false prophet among
other things and what about repaying Kevin evil for
what you perceive to be evil?
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:50:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is done for show tell not humor.
Some LDS are not initiated into the "meatier" doctrines of Mormonism and are shocked to learn of the protective undergarments. This creates a problem for the LDS, since they have to explain to their own members why they have kept it secret from them for
Lance, the gist of his reply was I choose no answer, for the simple reason
there is no serious answer to a rediculous question.
So, I eliminated the trick questions and posed the two serious ones in hope
that he would reconsider. They are not gobbledygook, or rediculous. Perhaps
he does
Did someone burn Mormon underwear?
When did holding something in your hand become a desecration.
You guys are either loosing hold of reality, or as usual blowing it out of proportion to gain better traction. Another case of False witness misrepresentation. Go d will hold you accountable no
Izzy, I have to vote for this book in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically
to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate
with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle
applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these
Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of
my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are
they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a
common ground between them?
Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26
1. He answered and said, it is
I guess the prophets in the Bible didn't care about the people
they "insulted" either. No wonder John the Baptist was beheaded. (By
people like you?) Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:51
AMTo:
JD, join the "Why We Can't Believe What We Read in the Bible
Club". Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:48
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Perry vs DaveH
In addition,
Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in the last
chapter of The Book? Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:39 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE:
I'm sure there are verses from the BoM that are just as "related"
to those who think so. It all looks like the work of the Master
Counterfiter to me. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:54 AMTo:
So then, CPL, 'his' subjective witness is unacceptable while yours is? He
did not quote Ja 1:5fg but it was his obvious reference.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 07, 2005 10:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
No. It could have easily been in the front of the book. Take the copyright
notices on movies and in our books today...always up front...but that does
not alter their effectiveness...in fact, it may even increase it since most
people don't read books cover to cover these days, or watch movies
God knew.
-Original Message-
Also, it does not matter what John thought Bible or book meant in the first
century, as someone suggested...he was just writing down what he was being
shown and told to write.
Perry
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt,
The unacceptability of my or Blaine's subjective witness is not the issue.
Whether or not it is Biblical is the issue.
Obvious references are made obvious by quoting scripture. No obvious quote,
no obvious reference.
Perry
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
I agree, and I think John recorded that effectively.
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:52:05 -0500
God knew.
-Original Message-
Also, it does not
Blaine: At least I don't run every person off the forum who disagrees
with me --talk about weird--or, maybe a better word is self-admiring. Now,
I will be the one to get in trouble for saying that, despite your constant
trash-mouthing of my religion and my character, for which nothing will
So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands?
Jd
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
Do you believe that what I wrote is a crrect teaching or not? -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:17:23 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Does thisapplyto yourself JD, or
If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what?
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:53:47
Was it the last chapter in the Bible when it waswritten?
Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:16:43 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in
There is no similarity JD and this is the seedbed of
heresy and hereticks; as someone has already noted, one
may just as well try to correlate scripture and the book of Mormon as this. Why not
allow the scriptures to speak
to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture? No worries
Why have yoou written this?
Why not allow the scriptures to speak
to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture?
Because it is a lesson I had to learn the hard way and
I fear some on TT have not learned it yet. jt
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:41:38 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why have yoou written
this?
Why not allow the scriptures to speak
to your heart rather than fill it
There is need to worry about me in this regard, but thank you anyway. A personal relationship with the Lord has an intrinsic way of solvingsuch a problem But, enough said.
Jd
Because it is a lesson I had to learn the hard way and I fear some on TT have not learned it yet. jt
On Tue, 07
FYI - I'd be interested in David/Christine Miller
Terry's take on this article since they are involved in
the home-church movement. jt
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which
follows. To view this item online,
Lance are you equating the Bible the Koran to a pair of skivvies?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:17 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
It's about as funny as it would be for you
There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times.
You are as crooked as the JW arguing against a Triune god,saying the word trinity is not in the bible
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PMTo:
Birds of a feather flock together!ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then why watch them? J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:18 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around
the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands?
Jd
Are you saying that somewhere in Salt Lake
We look for verses with similar wording and assume those passages have the same meaning and context.
Speak for yourself. I KNOW what the Bible says. So does Lance that is why he will not answer me with one of those "numerous" alternate understandings of John 3:36
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In
Personal EXPERIENCE?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do suchthings no longer care about those whom they insult.
JD-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
If you believe the Bible, you might consider the passages In the
photo--part of the Brigham Young Monument in Salt Lake City
Blaine
The Hosanna Shout,
given at the dedication of each new temple--also, 2 passages
I am not certain that I have a take, Judy.On one hand, I believe that
we are in the last days, and if so, things will get worse, not better.
On the other hand, if what I believe is incorrect, I believe that God
will bless the house church and it will multiply. More and more people
are studying
Subject: Chuck Pitman, Lt. Gen., US Marine Corps (Ret.) ~ " Apology
A Letter of Apology from Lieutenant General
In a message dated 6/7/2005 7:14:22 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh,
Blaine, if you took my response as serious, thinking the picture really is
of me in a clown suit, then you did not catch the gist of my jest. Dave
just forwarded some photo he got somehwere,
Dear Minister of Questions,
What did the word Trinity mean to the Apostle?
How did Paul view Bible search engines?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more important question IMO is "what did this word "bible" mean to the Apostle John in 98 AD.
JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL
I guess you just condemned a few Apostles, prophets and Jesus Christ!
Or did the religious crowd enjoy be called full of dead mens bones?
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:50:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof
CMON the proof is right before your eyes. Try closing your eyes and saying "I wish I were a bible critic" then click your heels.
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why
What did Paul think of Gay clothing in 98AD?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
God knew. -Original Message-Also, it does not matter what John thought Bible or book meant in the first century, as someone suggested...he was just writing down what he was being shown and told to
Just pointing out, (in your own post) YOU called CPL a clown, right after complaining about such behavoir.
?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blaine: At least I don't run every person off the forum who disagrees with me --talk about weird--or, maybe a better word is self-admiring. Now, I will be the
I did not set it on fire.
Although we did dry some on a clothesline.
http://www.fairlds.org/apol/antis/200404gc.html
(third pic down)[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands?
Jd
If a EFFEMINATE PC faith, fits you see to it!
Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.
Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying? But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly
The Prayer of a Minor Prophet
A W Tozer
The covenant and prayer of a preacher
This is the prayer of a man called to be a witness to the nations. This is what he said to his Lord on the day of his ordination. After the elders and ministers had prayed and laid their hands on him he withdrew to
I see more similarity with scrambled eggs![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what?
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
The Minister of Questions wants to know.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was it the last chapter in the Bible when it waswritten?
Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:16:43 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
much more information than I care to consider !!
JD-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:53:59 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you weren't waving it around? You
Home alone-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:05:05 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Yea hath God said?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you cannot see a similarity between the two references
Have you found an alternate interpretation yet?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why have yoou written this?
Why not allow the scriptures to speak
to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture?__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
JD says I see a very clear similarity.
I SEE IT!
I SEE IT!
They both have the words "it is the but"in them!
watch that ditch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what?
Why frame it as an undewrwear debate?
We hold the fig leaf aprons also. in the Temple Satan tells the LDS it is "a token of his priesthoods" and they put them on. A fig leaf will never cover your SIN!
http://www.fairlds.org/apol/antis/200302.html
I doubt that Bob was an eyewitness, but hey there
Blaine: That too. :)
In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:13:41 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are confusing.
Did you mean do not take me too
seriously?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blaine: Don't take me too personally, Kevin. I
Well, I do have to admit a slight resemblance.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:33:54 EDT
In a message dated 6/7/2005 7:14:22 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL
What then of this scripture?
Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath daysMarlin halverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sunday worship in your eyes is thena symptom of what? Kevin Deegan
I believe it, instead of
I dont know for sure, but suspect
so. However that is irrelevant, as God saw to it that it was the last
book in the Bible. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:14
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
I believe that dovetailing with that I
believe is the home-school movement. Its all very exciting! Thanks
Judy. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:32
PM
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject:
The rapture is Heresy?
Does that mean that you will separate from those that teach such heresy?
Since it is Heresy does it damn ones soul?
Just what effect does your label of heresy have? Any real effect, other than to raise a controversy?
According to Titus 3:9-10 a heretic follows his self
Terry, I think you are correct about some
of the mega-churches, if they function as spectator church. However, some
of the large churches are actually finding a way to return to first century
style fellowship, as there is a large gathering together under the church
roof, but it becomes a
Too funny
Bible blockheads
Those who love God and keep His commandments are not to
let other men judge them for these
wonderfulblessings.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 9:23
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:WWCofG lives
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
