Amen to Caroline and, to David on
this.
- Original Message -
From:
Caroline
Wong
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 27, 2005 22:44
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk]
Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Hell
No error, Kevin, but only the complexities
Lance wrote:
Theologian=Rational discourse concerning [God].
I did not realize that theologians had to be rational. There was a
discussion some time back in which I thought you and another person objected
to logic.
Furthermore, I think of study of God and religion when I think of the word
)
It matters much Who we say The Father is, Jesus is and, The Spirit is.
tcould - Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 28, 2005 06:38
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk]
Hell
Lance wrote
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 27, 2005 13:12
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Hell
Caroline wrote:
2) Can you name other theologians whom you
believe have no error in their theology?
Kevin wrote:
The Apostles
The Apostles were theologians?
Maybe the apostle Paul
] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk]
Hell
Theologian=Rational discourse concerning. Excluding myself, doesn't that
include all of the Apostles and all TTers?? (I knew the use of the word
'rational' would 'cause' you to agree with me, David)
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL
5 matches
Mail list logo
