ubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor
and the Canucks ... especially for y'all
In a message dated 7/23/2004 6:06:27 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Okay, okay, you are right, it was unnecessary and I shouldn't
have done it. I guess what comes around doesn't
Hi Bill. Don't get me wrong on this one. I am not one who takes the creation claims as allegory. Chapter 1:26,27 presents (to my thinking) a contextual consideration that allows (if not demands) the text to say that "mankind" is the view. I actually researched this one before drawing my
-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 8:33
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor
and the Canucks ... especially for y'all
Hi Bill. Don't get me wrong
on this one. I am not one who takes the creation claims as
allegory. Chap
There are numerous theologians, some of whom
are wonderfully Christian, who have read the creation account as allegory and have not taken it
literally. And so you are not alone if you conclude that "Adam" represents
collective mankind. For several reasons I do not agree with this account.
Subject: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor and
the Canucks ... especially for y'all
There are numerous theologians, some of whom
are wonderfully Christian, who have read the creation account as allegory and have not taken
it literally. And so you are not alone if you conclude that "
Judy:I don't understand your reluctance to 'own up'
to being TT's resident theologian and exegete.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 24, 2004 12:00
Subject: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor and
the Canucks ... especially
m:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07/24/2004 11:00 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor and
the Canucks ... especially for y'all
There are numerous theologians, some of whom
are wonderfully Christian, who have read the creation account as allegory and have
True, jtbut they have to be there
for Him to work in spite of them. J Izzy
I believe
God works in spite of rather than because of them.
In a message dated 7/24/2004 9:40:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nope! I'm an ordinary every day follower of Jesus who loves the truth of His Word. Understand I'm not against people in strange and in far-out systems (I've been through my share of them also including the
As to "nice surprises" how about this ...
that 'More Excellent Way' book came to our home through one in our
congregation. My wife has been reading it and said she sees a lot of good
in it.
jt: That is a "nice surprise"
I'd be interested in what she thinks after she gets into it a bit
\o/ !HALALU
Yah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua !
- Original Message -
From: Wm. Taylor
Sent: 07/23/2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor
and the Canucks ... especially for y'all
Not offended in the least, Chris, just a bit slow.
Thanks
Subject: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor and
the Canucks ... especially for y'all
\o/ !HALALU
Yah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless
Name of YahShua
!
I have never been much of
one for listening to preaching tapes. The exceptions to that have been
Robert Bayer
: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor
and the Canucks ... especially for y'all
Thanks Chris, tell us though: What does Taylor
have to do with the Canucks. Taylor is from the high plains of eastern
Colorado.He once worked one very cold winter in the taconite mines of
Northern Minnesota, replacing
Chris Barr
a servant
of
YHVH
- Original Message -
From:
Wm.
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07/23/2004 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Smithson,
Taylor and the Canucks ... especially for y'all
Thanks Chris, tell us though:
I enjoyed reading this application of Kruger thought. I enjoyed it because I agreed with it's conclusions. The parenthetical remark concerning JudyT caused some concern, however.
John
In a message dated 7/23/2004 8:23:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not offended
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Smithson, Taylor
and the Canucks ... especially for y'all
I enjoyed reading this application of
Kruger thought. I enjoyed it because I agreed with it's
conclusions. The parenthetical remark concerning JudyT caused some
concern, however. JohnIn a message
In a message dated 7/23/2004 6:06:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, okay, you are right, it was unnecessary and I shouldn't have done it. I guess what comes around doesn't have to go around. I will try to be better.
bill
You're a good man, Bill Taylor.
By the way,
\o/ !HALALU
Yah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless
Name of YahShua
!
I have never been much of
one for listening to preaching tapes. The exceptions to that have been
Robert Bayer (sometimes called "the Walking Bible" for his command of Scripture
all committed to memory) and John
18 matches
Mail list logo
