DO I CARE TO DISCUSS SHORT HAIR ON WOMEN? NO.
THE MAIN REASON THAT I AM LEAVING THIS LIST IS THAT I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE PERSONAL
OPINIONS OF THESE WOMEN. BLAH, BLAHI FEEL SORRY FOR THEIR HUSBANDS..BLAH,
BLAH, BLAH ALL DAY.
I WANT THE WORD OF GOD. THEY CAN LOOK LIKE
Elsworth, Seems to me that you
are the one who brought up this whole subject, and NOW you dont want to
discuss it? Could it be that your own
wife, Dr. Jan, does not have long hair, does not wear a proper headcovering, and does not preach to bums on the street???
Or is it just that you are
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is rich Elsman ... snip ... You truly will not be satisfied until
the women are gone and you can resume the crude scatalogical dialogue that
you appear to enjoy.
Judy, Elsman was not reprimanded for his scatological talk because women
were present...it was because
I hear you Perry and I'm glad that there are men on TT who find this kind of talk
unacceptable. I was addressing the kind of mail Elsman was sending to TT from his
list. It seemed like some kind of a good old boy thing having to do with male street
preachers and I got the idea (could be wrong)
Jim,
If you are really considering leaving this forum, why not stay and vote
with your delete key. You can follow the threads that interest you and skip
or delete the rest. I think your input and point of view are important and
would like to see you stay around a bit longer.
Perry
From:
In a message dated 5/13/2004 9:11:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could it be that your own wife, Dr. Jan, does not have long hair, does not wear a proper headcovering, and does not preach to bums on the street???
I heard that Jan refused to weasr the headcoverings Elsman
John,
I feel the statement below is inflamatory and uncalled for. It is clearly
an ad hominem, in that it attacks the persona of Jim and his wife rather
than the topic of head coverings for women. I have cut you some slack from
time to time, as I have Jim, but statements like the one below
7 matches
Mail list logo
