Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-28 Thread ttxpress
DavidMs logical precision is soprecise thatthe Nazi AH qualifies as a Christian* this means, that DavidM, by definition, is not a Christian (yet) (sorry, L-- rofx666!!:-) dizzily yours, (and tell Dr GT hi:-) -- *ftr, in 1923AH was jailed for engineering an attempted public overthrow

RE: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-28 Thread ShieldsFamily
I think Glenns little eSoul has been reincarnated into garys. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 10:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by

RE: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-28 Thread ShieldsFamily
See what I mean? Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 10:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits you're lying about your poor

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-28 Thread ttxpress
what's the relationship betw following Christ and Nazi-ism(?); any logical comments, Izzy?

RE: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
Another nitpicker on TT. sigh Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 1:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits On Fri, 27 Dec

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread David Miller
Gary wrote: you employed double negatives; i eliminated them both for clarity No, I did not employ a double negative. A double negative is where the same phrase has two negatives where one negative modifies the next negative. The two negatives you eliminated were from two separate phrases.

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread David Miller
Laura wrote: So a person can be a Christian and not follow Christ??? Yes. Trying to follow Christ, or thinking that you are following Christ, is not the same thing as actually following Christ. Many people will say, Lord, Lord, did we not do many wonderful things in your name? (Mat. 7:22).

RE: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
Laura, Then you are the one who thinks Hitler was a Christian! ROFL!!! Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread CHamm56114
In a message dated 12/27/2002 11:51:59 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Laura, Then you are the one who thinks Hitler was a Christian! ROFL!!! Izzy Not me You can't become a Christian any way other than salvation Laura

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread David Miller
Laura wrote: Apparentlly our definition of Christian is different. I don't believe a person becomes a Christian by joining a church or even by saying they are a Christian. Does your church have church membership? Do you know of any churches that have church membership? Are there any church

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread CHamm56114
In a message dated 12/27/2002 1:13:52 PM Central Standard Time, GJ Tabor writes: I'm asking YOU to tell me what religion they are. Suppose we consider a person who claims to follow Jesus Christ, who joins a church, is baptized by that church, attends it regularly and all that, but they are not

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread CHamm56114
In a message dated 12/27/2002 1:13:52 PM Central Standard Time, GJ Tabor writes: So, then am I correct in understanding that they are NOT using your definition of Christian, but some other definition of Christian? Would you say that your definition of "Christian" is in the minority or majority?

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-27 Thread CHamm56114
In a message dated 12/27/2002 4:16:02 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this what you mean when you call them heathens? Are they people who do not acknowledge God? No I don't mean that heathens are evil people but I think of them as nonbelievers. I think nonbelievers can be

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread Marlin Halverson
"1) Just because a person says he is a Christian does not mean that he is one! This is essential to understand when considering evil people of history and also when considering where we personally stand with the Lord. Therefore, I'll say it again: JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAYS THEY ARE A

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread ttxpress
ftr: On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:34:20 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes to Marlin:With regard to Hitler, those who claim he was..a Christian have to say that he was..a "REAL" Christian.

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread David Miller
Gary wrote: ftr: On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:34:20 -0500 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes to Marlin: With regard to Hitler, those who claim he was.. a Christian have to say that he was..a REAL Christian. You call me a liar and then you quote me like you do above, ftr? The actual quote

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread ttxpress
the two statements equate; iow, the quoting belowis accurate; i'd suggest, think it throughaheada time rather than try to distance/reverse yourself later On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 23:01:22 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gary wrote: ftr: On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:34:20 -0500

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread David Miller
Gary wrote: the two statements equate; iow, the quoting below is accurate; i'd suggest, think it through aheada time rather than try to distance/reverse yourself later The two statements do not equate. I stand by my statement, but I suggest you need to reverse yourself. Peace be with you.

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread Marlin Halverson
Dave M.: Why is it that any of us feel any need to defend Christianity? Why not instead simply serve the person, Jesus Christ? Amen --Marlin Dave M.: In any case, someone needs to let Glenn know that Marlin doesn't believe Hitler was a true Christian. That ought to set some things straight

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread CHamm56114
In a message dated 12/26/2002 8:36:33 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In any case, someone needs to let Glenn know that Marlin doesn't believe Hitler was a true Christian. That ought to set some things straight there, but I myself am in hotter fire now by arguing that Hitler

Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is known by its fruits

2002-12-26 Thread ttxpress
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:16:09 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:The two statements do not equate. yes they do--you employed double negatives; i eliminated them both for clarity iow, try excluding only one of your two 'nots', below truthfully, there's no misquote, DavidM; my