In a message dated 9/21/2004 7:58:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"It is a sense of one religion being a true religion," Miller said. "He
has made a choice. But it is very complicated. It involves emotions.
And you are in fact negating something in favor of something
John, I didt remember posting the
quote below, and have no idea what you are talking about. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
, September 22, 2004 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
In a message dated 9/21/2004 7:58:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"It is a sense of one religion being a true religion," Miller said. "He
has made a choice.
Jewish.
Steve Pokin can be reached a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004
11:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a message dated 9/8/2004 4:48
In a message dated 9/8/2004 4:48:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would also recomend OUR FATHER ABRAHAM, JEWISH ROOTS OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH by Marvin Wilson. Sterns commentary is exelent but without some background in the Jewish roots of Christianity it could be tough
Good!
I hope you enjoy them. I'm sure we will have some delightful discussions as we
[both] agree and disagree with the writers. I haven't read Garr, yet, but I will
put that book on my to-buy list. Thanks.
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
,
2004 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Good! I hope you enjoy them. I'm sure we
will have some delightful discussions as we [both] agree and disagree with the
writers. I haven't read Garr, yet, but I will put that book on my to-buy list.
Thanks
In a message dated 9/8/2004 2:48:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, Since we didnt get far together with Kruger, Im interested in what you think of Garrs book. I havent read itwill wait for your report on it as well as the others. Izzy
Se, senoreta --- interesting.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 12:14
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
In a message dated 9/7/2004 2:11:19 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I have
by Edith
Schaeffer.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004
12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
In a message dated 9/7/2004 2:11:19 PM
Pacific
I have no idea from scripture as to why you have written
the above, expecailly that last thought -- "they're 'in' as a
result." The Jew and the Gentile are the same in the sight of God in terms
of salvation's walk. They have no special consideration in
that regard.
Agreed. I am merely
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Monday, September 06, 2004 10:29 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to
you
Slade wrote:
Another interesting point: the Torah was never given
Slade Henson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Terry
Clifton
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 10:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Slade wrote
In a message dated 9/7/2004 2:11:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no idea from scripture as to why you have written the above, expecailly that last thought -- "they're 'in' as a result." The Jew and the Gentile are the same in the sight of God in terms of salvation's
Tim -- I am saying that faith (the conviction that Jesus is the Son and His promises are mine), love (love God and love thy neightbor), and the Force of God within us constitute the "new" Law/Covenant."
Are you saying that Lev. 19:18 and Ex. 23:5 state fully the new covenant relationship? If
In a message dated 9/4/2004 4:52:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You submitted these verses in defense of your argument that the Law has changed. I say your god changed. Mine does not, he is the same yesterday today and forever.
So He was just kidden when He spoke of
Slade wrote:
Good for the parents of John the B. Does this mean that their righteousness exceeded the need for faith to be credited to them in place of their righteous failures (Ro 4:14-25)?
I find this interesting. Youre not arguing with Tim (or me) on this point. Youre arguing with the One
]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004
1:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
No
one is saying that commandment keeping is out, certainly not me.
None of these passages say that one is lost because he fails in his commandment
keeping
Jt:You have almost completely misapprehended what
has been spoken both here and,at various times when spokenby four
participants on TT. I, speaking only for myself, will no longer engage you on
this issue.
As to 'mentors. well, you've named yours (Dake,
Scofield et al) while I have as
Iz:A title of some interest (you have it I
think)Sabbath by Abraham Joshua Heschel
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004 17:39
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
Tim, How do you
observe
you further on such matters.
thanks,
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004 18:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
jt: Why do you ask formy words Lance when
God's Word is so much
: September 01, 2004 20:16
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
I rest from work and
purchasing for the most part. I
congregate with like-minded believers.
The issue is not the just the Sabbath however, the issue is Gods Law,
of which Sabbath is a part. The
second
, profanity, etc
C. Tim Winkley
Aka Law Man
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, September 01,
2004 11:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
From:
[EMAIL
to agree with you here.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of C. Tim Winkley
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004
8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
It seems to me Izzy, when someone has a
misunderstanding
, September 02, 2004
6:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
It seems to me Izzy, when someone has a
misunderstanding of the beauty of Gods Law, we who love it are
immediately accused of trying to find legal justification for keeping it (which
gendereth to bondage
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01,
2004 11:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a message dated 9/1/2004 9:32:29 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Iz:A title of some interest (you have it I think)Sabbath by
Abraham Joshua Heschel
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004
17:39
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
In a message dated 9/2/2004 6:23:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, What is there to obey except Gods commandments? Izzy
What commands? The Sabboth observance, Laws of cleanliness? etc. or love God and love your neighbor as yourself?
We no longer have (or
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004
8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a message dated 9/2/2004 6:23:44 AM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Izzy:Bless you for your God-motivated activity
(don't like activism). Keep it up sister.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 31, 2004 18:50
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
Izzy jumps back in in
red
ECTED]
Sent: August 31, 2004 17:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
In a message dated 8/31/2004 12:28:56 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am sorry in the last message you used the term Law, I
understand covenant as used in this email.The wo
C. Tim Winkley wrote:
Terry,
Perhaps
you should read the verse again.
Who else would your enemy be other than someone who hateth
thee?
Exodus
23:5If thou see the ass of
him that hateth thee lying under his burden,
and wouldest forbear to help him, thou
Jt:'You go' Oprahism UN Institution of
goodlessness
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004 08:05
Subject: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to
you - the reds vs the blue :)
Izzy jumps back in in
red! J and Judy
Jt:I don't but, please note how popular culture
pervades your world (i.e. speach)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004 08:46
Subject: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to
you - the reds vs the blue :)
On
]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
10:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a
message dated 8/31/2004 8:22:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Brother John,
My responses in blue (you better duck
In a message dated 9/1/2004 5:42:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 06:38:27 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One plan (Incarnation), one covenant (Abrahamic), one 'delivery system' (Grace) (Again I say read the paragraph prior to the
Tim
I am going to continue this discussion in spite of the nagging thought that we may be talking about much the same thing. . I mean - it appears that we might be using the same argument to arrive at two very different conclusions. Maybe we do not know enough about the others ultimate
John wrote:
God has always been a God who honored outpouring and
contrition over obedience.
God wrote:
Matt 12:7; Mark 12:33] to obey
is better than sacrifice, And to
heed than the fat of rams.
Izzy
In a message dated 9/1/2004 8:10:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
God has always been a God who honored outpouring and contrition over obedience.
God wrote:
Matt 12:7; Mark 12:33] to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams.
Correctamundo Johnmeister!!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004 11:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
In a message dated 9/1/2004 3:41:37 AM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
In a message dated 9/1/2004 8:21:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correctamundo Johnmeister!!
Wheeewww.
Jt:Fast food diet I'm promoting? In many posts,
this one included, I've outlined my understanding of Scripture's teaching vis a
vis The Nature of God The Nature of God's Gospel. (These two interlocking
themes I believe to be a distillation of all of our conversations about
everything). You
Jt:God is a Covenant God?? Again, in your own
words..what is a 'covenant God?'
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 01, 2004 11:28
Subject: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to
you
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:40:34 EDT
John wrote:
God has always been a God who honored outpouring and
contrition over obedience.
God
wrote:
Matt
12:7; Mark 12:33] to obey is
better than sacrifice, And to heed
than the fat of rams.
Izzy
Obey what? And please reconcile Ps 51:16-17 and Isa 58:9-11.Verses
like
Tim, How do you observe the Sabbath?
Please explain what you mean about the Keep the Sabbath Holy statement.
Thanks, Izzy
You asked if I observed the Sabbath. I sincerely
appreciate the way you phrased that question. The commandment states that we
are to remember the
jt: Why do you ask formy words Lance when
God's Word is so much better?
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:54:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jt:God is a Covenant God?? Again, in your own
words..what is a 'covenant God?'
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:40:34 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 9/1/2004 8:30:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: I don't think he is trying to win anything John - His testimony as I understand it does not include denominational training. He reads the Bible. What he is saying here is what the Bible teaches.
js: All
In a message dated 9/1/2004 8:37:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
js: Again, much of what Tim and I are saying is mirrored thinking. In the end, he comes up with commandment keeping and I do not. All of the above is true. And God honored the notion of grace, His notion of
ShieldsFamily wrote:
John
wrote:
God
has always been a God who honored outpouring and
contrition over obedience.
God
wrote:
Matt
12:7; Mark 12:33] to obey
is
better than sacrifice,
And to heed
than the fat of rams.
Izzy
Obey what? And
In a message dated 9/1/2004 2:28:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
God has always been a God who honored outpouring and contrition over obedience.
God wrote:
Matt 12:7; Mark 12:33] to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams.
Izzy
Obey
In a message dated 9/1/2004 2:39:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tim, How do you observe the Sabbath? Please explain what you mean about the Keep the Sabbath Holy statement. Thanks, Izzy
It has something to do with someone's mother.
: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Tim, How do you observe
the Sabbath? Please explain what you mean about the Keep the Sabbath Holy
statement. Thanks, Izzy
You
asked if I observed the Sabbath. I sincerely appreciate the way you
phrased that question. The commandment states
you can convince anyone
about. If their heart is ready they will receive it. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of C. Tim Winkley
Sent: Wednesday, September 01,
2004 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
I rest
]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01,
2004 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a
message dated 9/1/2004 3:41:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
One
plan (Incarnation), one covenant (Abrahamic), one 'delivery system' (Grace)
(Again
In a message dated 9/1/2004 5:49:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, So do you still have a problem, or what? Izzy
Its just that I asked "obey what" and you answered obey God rather than man --- I really do not see that as an aswer to my question. But, if you only
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01,
2004 10:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a message dated 9/1/2004 5:49:01 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
No one is saying that commandment keeping is out, certainly not me. None of these passages say that one is lost because he fails in his commandment keeping. None establish the Mosaical code. So if you agree with that , then case closed.. but I will make a few comments.
John
In a message
In a message dated 9/1/2004 9:32:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, What is there to obey except Gods commandments? Izzy
What commands? The Sabboth observance, Laws of cleanliness? etc. or love God and love your neighbor as yourself?
believers.
Tim
-Original
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Monday, August 30, 2004 9:25
PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
C. Tim Winkley
wrote:
One thing is
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004
11:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C. Tim Winkley
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 4:08
PM
To: [EMAIL
Do
you consider yourself a believer?
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004
10:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
What is this law that needs
]On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
4:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Tim, God's
Law can be lost and it has been lost in the past. One exaple is in the book of
Nehemiah
when they
found a copy and it was read to the people. They wept
Tim:Just answer the Bishop's question.
- Original Message -
From:
C. Tim
Winkley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 31, 2004 07:12
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
Do you consider yourself a
believer?
-Original
Message
wrong. Come with humility. Your holier than
thou response below is not needed.
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 4:01
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Izzy, we
://hdr.undp.org/statistics/data/index_indicators.cfm.
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004
10:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
And DaveH I find it hard to see how a country
but it is just that, on its own. Even a Satanist can be
moral Izzy.
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Hi Izzy,
As I asked
: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Hi Izzy,
As I asked please go back and read the
thread entitled Moralism versus Christianity. Your grasp of this concept
is slipping between your fingers at an alarming rate. Do not come to the
table looking through your own ideologue. Do not come to the table just
understand my viewpoint at all? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
7:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Izzy,
Look at your definition of moral (even
though we
, August
30, 2004
10:57 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
And DaveH I find it hard to see how a country who will not take the best
care of you is a country looking out for you.
DAVEH: Some of us believe the
best way to take
care of people
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
6:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Tim:Just
answer the Bishop's question.
-
Original Message -
From: C. Tim Winkley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 31
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Izzy,
I have not been involved in name calling. Please identify where I have. I have exposed what I see your attitude as being: holier than thou. Read your own posts again. They drip with sarcasm and place you in a position above me. I have
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Izzy in blue:
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Izzy,
I
have not been
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
What is this law that needs to be restored in the congregation of believers?
John
Of course. Do you? And about my question?
John
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a
message dated 8/31/2004 4:14:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Do you consider yourself
a believer?
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL
In a message dated 8/31/2004 9:23:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I consider myself a believer. Let me be specific. I was born under the penalty of sin. In other words my body will die and my desire was to disobey God. As a result of my yielding to my nature to
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Jonathan in some colour other than black, blue or red. Hmm I think
I will use green.
Izzy in
blue:
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Hughes
JonathanSent: Tuesday,
August 31, 2004 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley
to you
In a
message dated 8/31/2004 4:14:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Do
you consider yourself a believer?
-Original
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Lance, Just when we are getting down to specifics
you want us to abandon the conversation? Please dont encourage that.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
10:02
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Izzy in bold: Okay Jonathan, this conversation is getting unwieldy, so I
will cut to the main point here below: You and I, as Believers in the Living
God, should be capable of agreeing between us that only God can and does
John,
I am sorry, you have used two terms
I am not familiar with.
Old Law
New Law
Are you saying that these terms are
Biblical? If so, please submit a
reference. Maybe you are talking
about covenants.
C. Tim Winkley
Aka Law Man
Hi
Judy,
Welcome to the fray. To answer your first question, unequivocally I
consider myself to be able to judge (used in the sense of discernment, not in
the sense of putting myself in a position above the other) the foreign policy
and its inventors in America. I certainly believe that
Winkley
Aka Law Man
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a
message dated 8/31/2004 9:23:15 AM Pacific Daylight
In a message dated 8/31/2004 11:21:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John,
I am sorry, you have used two terms I am not familiar with.
Old Law
New Law
Are you saying that these terms are Biblical? If so, please submit a reference. Maybe you are talking about
In a message dated 8/31/2004 12:28:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am sorry in the last message you used the term Law, I understand covenant as used in this email.
The woman I sleep with most nights is both a wife and a mother. Two very different things. Same woman.
PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004
3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
In a
message dated 8/31/2004 11:21:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
John,
I
am sorry, you have used two terms I am
C. Tim Winkley wrote:
Brother
John,
Galatians
5:14For all the law is
fulfilled in one word, even
in
this; Thou shalt love thy
neighbour as
thyself
Leviticus
19:18Thou shalt not avenge,
nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt
Tim, did I miss your comment on my response post, giving you the scriptural references you requested :
In a message dated 8/31/2004 11:21:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John,
I am sorry, you have used two terms I am not familiar with.
Old Law
New Law
Are you
Terry,
Perhaps
you should read the verse again.
Who else would your enemy be other than someone who hateth thee?
Exodus
23:5If thou see the ass of
him that hateth thee lying under his burden,
and wouldest forbear to help him, thou shalt surely help with him.
C.
Tim Winkley
Aka
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Jonathan, Do you really
want big government taking care of you? Americans
dont want to trade freedom to get dependency on big (tax eating,
godless, bureaucratic ) government telling them what they need and how to
live. Thats why we
: opportunity and the ability to make money.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Jonathan Hughes wrote
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
My favourite quote from OReillys Whos Looking out for You:
Finally, the war in Iraq proves once again that ideologues can never look
out for you. They are too blinded by the light on the right or the left and
they will never
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
I find O'Reilly very interesting and dare I say it, enjoyable. I
listened to the unabridged audio version of Who's looking out for
You the other week and was impressed. It was pure moralism, but for
moralism it was great.
God is going to do that. Unfortunately, considering the culture
has fallen and with the church apostasy ripening as foretold we can look
forward to major disaster coming our way.
If we study the Biblical pattern, for nations that God blessed, and then
turned away we will find that a good
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from O'Reilley to you
Jonathan, I'm so glad I'm not an ideologue! The minute the Democrat party
represents the things I believe in, I'll be happy to vote for it. :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
C. Tim Winkley wrote:
One
thing is to restore Gods Law back
to its original place in the congregation of believers.
DAVEH: ??? Can you please elaborate a little more on that, Tim?
Are you suggesting Gods Law
has been lost and needs to be restored?
--
]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
C. Tim Winkley wrote:
One thing is to restore Gods Law back to its original place in the
congregation of believers.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 4:01
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
Izzy, we have had this conversation a
number of times. The latest is from a thread
97 matches
Mail list logo
