Chris, how old is your youngest? Does he read TT himself, or do you just
tell him about it. If his comment is based on what you tell him, I fully
understand his reply.
Perry
From: Chris Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hognose
DO I CARE TO DISCUSS SHORT HAIR ON WOMEN? NO.
THE MAIN REASON THAT I AM LEAVING THIS LIST IS THAT I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE PERSONAL
OPINIONS OF THESE WOMEN. BLAH, BLAHI FEEL SORRY FOR THEIR HUSBANDS..BLAH,
BLAH, BLAH ALL DAY.
I WANT THE WORD OF GOD. THEY CAN LOOK LIKE
Judge righteous judgment -- John 7:24.
My youngest is right on target as usual. Of course, Judy decreeing otherwise
indicated that was the case. Looking forward to Well done good and faithful servant.
jt: You and your son judge by outward appearance and by some distorted religious view
you
Chris wrote:
The primary problem is your dishonesty
and your blindness.
You are causing me to start to speculate within about your own
dishonesty and blindness.
Chris wrote:
When you held up Green's to Jahn's as having the
same foundation I had such a great laugh!
Why? They both favor
Elsworth, Seems to me that you
are the one who brought up this whole subject, and NOW you dont want to
discuss it? Could it be that your own
wife, Dr. Jan, does not have long hair, does not wear a proper headcovering, and does not preach to bums on the street???
Or is it just that you are
ROFL! Would you care for one of our home remedies? Or maybe youd
better just stay close to the, well you know Izzy
Do you get together with your neighbors and
just get to know them and then tell them about Christ or do you just knock on
their door and tell them they are going
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is rich Elsman ... snip ... You truly will not be satisfied until
the women are gone and you can resume the crude scatalogical dialogue that
you appear to enjoy.
Judy, Elsman was not reprimanded for his scatological talk because women
were present...it was because
Elsman,
I hope you fill us in on the 4 Levels. If not for the women,
at least for the mens crankcases? Izzy
ELSMAN
P.S.
I WILL
ENLIGHTEN YOU ABOUT WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS RE THE 4
LEVELS SOME OTHER TIME. MAYBE DAVID HAS TIME NOW.
I WILL SAY
THIS: HUBERT ALWAYS SAID THAT ANY
I hear you Perry and I'm glad that there are men on TT who find this kind of talk
unacceptable. I was addressing the kind of mail Elsman was sending to TT from his
list. It seemed like some kind of a good old boy thing having to do with male street
preachers and I got the idea (could be wrong)
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of
YahShua !
Y'all have such great difficulty even knowing what "ad hominem" is.
Y'all identify "name calling" as "ad hominem" ... 'tain't necessarily so.
Y'all identify "calling a spade a spade" as "ad hominem" ... t'ain't never
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of
YahShua !
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05/13/2004 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hognose
snakes
jt: You and your son judge by outward appearance
and by some distorted religious view you and your mentor the late John
jt: What about the ignorant sitting on a church pew. God said through the prophet MY
people perish for lack of knowledge so ignorance is not good no matter where one
finds it. FYI DaveH is a self professed happy Mormon, one who is not interested in
changing, oil in crankcase, or come hell or
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of
YahShua !
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller"
Sent: 05/13/2004 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Bible
versions
I'm glad that God does not
have your attitude.
No, David, The
Almighty does not have my
David: Is there anything a family member can say, think, or do which would
displease you? Lance
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 12, 2004 21:03
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Mediation of Christ
I would like to ask Bill, Lance,
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:56
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] GIRLS
MUST KNOW KNOWN KNOWNS KNOWN UNKNOWNS
In a message dated 5/12/2004 10:18:13 PM Central Daylight
Jonathan wrote:
I think that there are many things that a person
can say, think, or do that would be displeasing
to God. I do not believe that these things make
one unaccepted by God.
Why then did the Torah say the following?
If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not
David Miller wrote:
I'm getting lost even more. Didache = doctrine,
so why do you use it to refer to faith? Didache
has to do with the intellect.
And what does passionate have to do with faith?
Passionate = sensuality and flesh, not faith which
is spirit. I don't even view faith
Izzy wrote:
David, I don't recall your lovely wife wearing a
head covering. Is she not compliant with scripture?
Oh, Izzy. You are going to get me into deep trouble with Elsman now.
:-) He is going to accuse me for the rest of my life about how I do not
have my wife in subjection to me and
Lance wrote:
Is there anything a family member can say, think,
or do which would displease you?
Yes, most definitely, yes.
Are you going to answer my question? I think it would help me
understand your thinking better.
Is there anything that a person can say, think,
or do that would be
Your youngest son Chris? How sad that youthful optimism has been replaced by such
a judgmental spirit but then he is probably the product of your training.
The saddest part of the whole thing is that he will have to give account for all of
his judgmental pronouncements before the Lord, and
Your youngest son Chris? How sad that youthful optimism has been replaced by such
a judgmental spirit but then he is probably the product of your training.
The saddest part of the whole thing is that he will have to give account for all of
his judgmental pronouncements before the Lord, and
-Original Message-
Izzy wrote:
David, I don't recall your lovely wife wearing a
head covering. Is she not compliant with scripture?
Oh, Izzy. You are going to
get me into deep trouble with Elsman now.
:-) He is going to accuse
me for the rest of my life about how I do
I find your response here interesting David. I have found that the reason women are
bound in church settings is mainly because of the attitude/fear of the men involved.
I've only been to one Church where I saw true freedom. Not rebellion - genuine
freedom in ministry blessing others through
Something else I have noticed about women and head coverings is that
older women have this tendency to cut their hair very short. If I
survey the women's heads in my church, the younger women tend to have
long hair, which serves as a covering for her, while the older women
tend to have hair that
DavidM wirtes:
Oh, Izzy. You are going to get me into deep trouble with Elsman now.
:-) He is going to accuse me for the rest of my life about how I do not have my wife
in subjection to me and the Scriptures!
jt: I have a hard time believing that a smart man like Elsman is not just pulling
In a message dated 5/13/2004 8:55:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Original Message-
Izzywrote:
David, I don't recall your lovely wife wearing a
head covering. Is she not compliant with scripture?
Oh, Izzy. You are going to get me into deep trouble with Elsman
In a message dated 5/13/2004 7:31:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AND GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO ACCEPT JESUS, BASED ON KNOWLEDGE, NO ONE ELSE LIKELY WILL, AND THEY WILL GO TO HELL, BECAUSE THE GIRLS JUST WANTED TO COOK FOR THEIR NEIGHBORS AND HOPE THAT OSMOSIS WOULD INFUSE THEM
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of
YahShua !
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller"
Sent: 05/10/2004 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Bible
versions
Chris wrote: Green admits in his own
version that he goes beyond that used by the KJV. David
Jim,
If you are really considering leaving this forum, why not stay and vote
with your delete key. You can follow the threads that interest you and skip
or delete the rest. I think your input and point of view are important and
would like to see you stay around a bit longer.
Perry
From:
Hi Chris.
I think your son is rather perceptive. What is his name?
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
HANSEN,
MY ANSWER IS TOO LONG FOR THIS LIST. IT INVOLVES MEN'S RESPONSE TO 4- LEVELS OF SEPARATE ENLIGHTENMENT SET FORTH IN THE BIBLE. THE SINNERS ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE BEFORE THE LORD. HOWEVER, OTHER PRINCIPLES COME INTO PLAY BEFORE A JUST GOD:
1. UNTO WHOM MUCH IS GIVEN.THAT IS, DAVID MILLER
Dogs have been considered in the same manner as by my African brother going back into
antiquity. It is actually a strong precept from ScriptureA mother in Scripture
had a daughter possessed by a demon. The mother sought YahShua to cast out the demon.
Wouldn't you think that The Saviour
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of
YahShua !
ROTFLMHO
No holiday declared today ...
I'm neither in nor from Arkansas. Not
that it matters ... you're talking to me about backwoods health care folk tales
and you want to denigrate Arkansas! ROTFLMHO!!!
High
I'm neither in nor from Arkansas. Not that it matters ... you're talking to me about
backwoods health care folk tales and you want to denigrate Arkansas! ROTFLMHO!!!
jt: I'm not denigrating anything, just saying that your way is the cultural norm in
that State. Could be wrong about where
Chris wrote:
Y'all have such great difficulty even knowing
what ad hominem is. Y'all identify name
calling as ad hominem ... 'tain't necessarily
so. Y'all identify calling a spade a spade as
ad hominem ... t'ain't never so.
Whether or not Jesus called people names is not the issue
In a message dated 5/13/2004 7:02:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judyt: Amen! Indeed women do LIVE the gospel. The content of your, Izzy's
Laura's posts just get better and better. Form AND content both matter
HOWEVER, to repeat myself: We're not looking forward to God
Chris wrote:
Truth, Adonay, yet bitches eat of the crumbs
which fall from their masters' table.
Was that an ad hominem from The Saviour? No.
Was that an insult from The Saviour. Yes, and
one of a very degrading nature.
Apparently I missed this one but you've done it again. I'd throw out
In a message dated 5/13/2004 9:11:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could it be that your own wife, Dr. Jan, does not have long hair, does not wear a proper headcovering, and does not preach to bums on the street???
I heard that Jan refused to weasr the headcoverings Elsman
Note:
Another point I forgot to make - this women got some crumbs and we who are God's
Covenant people through Christ are not even getting that these days. Anytime you've
got to depend on food additives etc. you're not walking in Covenant blessings. In fact
you're no better off than the world
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of
YahShua !
OK, now for some "attention to detail" in case any legitimate scientists or
scholars are paying any attention
...
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller"
Sent: 05/13/2004 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
John,
I feel the statement below is inflamatory and uncalled for. It is clearly
an ad hominem, in that it attacks the persona of Jim and his wife rather
than the topic of head coverings for women. I have cut you some slack from
time to time, as I have Jim, but statements like the one below
In a message dated 5/13/2004 5:14:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Miller wrote:
I'm getting lost even more. "Didache" = doctrine,
so why do you use it to refer to faith? Didache
has to do with the intellect.
And what does "passionate" have to do with faith?
42 matches
Mail list logo
