[TruthTalk] Courtesy of A.Word.A.Day

2002-11-03 Thread Dave
The only gift is giving to the poor; / All else is exchange.
-Thiruvalluvar, poet (c. 30 BCE)

--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who 
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be 
subscribed.



Re: [TruthTalk] Sin Christian Perfection

2002-11-03 Thread Dave
 

David Miller wrote:

 DaveH wrote:
  To me it [the cross] was a work of those who rallied
  against  God.  But through his power, my Lord overcame
  the effect of the cross and was resurrected-

 I think the Mormons teach contrary to the Bible about the cross and the
 blood shed on the cross.  Was the cross part of God's plan,

DAVEH:  Yes.  But so was Judas.

 or was it the
 enemy rising against God?

DAVEH:  I was also a tool of the enemy of the Gospel.

  I can understand how you might see the enemy is
 involved rising against God and your Savior, but surely you must understand
 that this was part of God's plan to bring salvation.

DAVEH:  Agreed.  However, there are lots of 'not so pleasant' things that are a part 
of the Lord's plan to bring salvation to mankind.  For instance, would Protestants 
wear little drops of blood jewelry (such as the Red Cross gives you when you give
blood)?  Wouldn't that be an important symbol for Christians that represents the 
Lord's love for us?

 I know that you have
 been taught about the blood Jesus sweat in the Garden, but the blood shed on
 the cross is what redeemed mankind, according to the Scriptures, which
 cannot be broken.  Consider the following passages and their emphasis on
 the cross:

 For the preaching OF THE CROSS is to them that perish foolishness; but UNTO
 US WHICH ARE SAVED IT IS THE POWER OF GOD.
 (1Cor. 1:18)

DAVEH:  I view preaching of the cross to be a bit different than idolizing it.  From 
you perspective, it may not seem like idolization, but from my LDS perspective it 
does.particularly when I see the way the RCC folks relate to the cross.

 And whosoever DOTH NOT BEAR HIS CROSS, and come after me, cannot be my
 disciple.  (Luke 14:27)

DAVEH:  I think we both recognize this as being symbolic of what we will experience, 
rather than the jewelry we should wear.do you not agree, DavidM???

 But God forbid that I should GLORY, save IN THE CROSS of our Lord Jesus
 Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.  (Gal
 6:14)

 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the
 middle wall of partition between us; Having ABOLISHED IN HIS FLESH the
 enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in
 himself of twain one new man, so making peace; And that he might reconcile
 both unto God in one body BY THE CROSS, having slain the enmity thereby.
 (Eph 2:14-16)

DAVEH:  The 'wall' or 'partition' I believe Paul was referring to was physical death, 
which the Lord overcame with his resurrection.

 Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye
 have us for an example. (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and
 now tell you even weeping, that they are the ENEMIES OF THE CROSS OF CHRIST:
 Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in
 their shame, who mind earthly things.) For our conversation is in heaven;
 from whence also we look for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall
 change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body,
 according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto
 himself.  (Phi 3:17-21)

DAVEH:  Again, it seems he is referring to a physical resurrection.

 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fullness dwell; And,
 having made peace THROUGH THE BLOOD OF HIS CROSS,

DAVEH:  That's an interesting comment.  Crosses don't have blood, so do you think he 
might have been referring to Christ's burden (taking upon himself the sins of the 
world) with his BLOOD OF HIS CROSS reference?  If so, I believe that initially
happened in the Garden of Eden.  His death on the cross sealed (finalized) the 
atonement.

 by him to reconcile all
 things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or
 things in heaven. And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your
 mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled In the body of his flesh
 through death, to present you holy and unblamable and unreprovable in his
 sight.  (Col 1:19-22)

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.
  

--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who 
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be 
subscribed.



Re: [TruthTalk] Dave h: TheFather as man

2002-11-03 Thread Dave



michael douglas wrote:



Can
you address the above for me...

DAVEH: I did. Furthermore, there are several Biblical comments
that infer his Father is an exalted man..
"...he that hath seen me hath seen the Father;.." Jn 14:9
Where in this verse does it say that The Father is an exalted man?
...and..
"Who being the brightness of his glory, and the EXPRESS IMAGE OF HIS
PERSON, and ..." Heb 1:3
The only thing that these verses can suggest in
this regard is that God is a man, and that a non-exalted
one, for these verses refer to Jesus in His pre/non-exalted
state. He was only exalted after He ascended on high. Therefore if we are
to make this kind of association this LDS theory breaks completely down...
Can you see that?

DAVEH: No Michael, I don't see it that way at all. Nor do I
understand why you see it that way. Paul wrote this AFTER Jesus had
become exalted. Furthermore, to quote vs 3...
"Who being the brightness of his glory, and the EXPRESS IMAGE OF HIS
PERSON, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had
by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on
high;"
.leaves little room to think Paul was not referring to Jesus
in his exalted (after purging our sins, than sat on the right hand of his
Father) position.

"Let
this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, BEING IN THE
FORM OF GOD, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" Phi 2:6-7
You have to finish the passage... It says He took
upon himself the form of a servant, and being found in fashion as a man...
So it tells us that the God-state is totally different from the man-state,
it is something He had acquired on becoming human.

DAVEH: OK..vs 8...
"And being found in fashion of a man, he humbled himself, and became
obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."
...Yes, the "fashion as a man" refers to his ability to die, which
his exalted Father could not do. Nor can Jesus in his now exalted
state do. But before he became exalted, death was something he was
capable of doing and is how he was compared to men by Paul.

Finally,
John 1 said that '...the Word became/was made flesh and dwelt amongst
us...' This tells us that God is not flesh.

DAVEH: I don't agree, Michael. Before Jesus was born into the
world, he was the God of the Old Testament, and as such was a spirit.
(I've previously explained the spirit creation.but if you don't understand
what I've previously posted, I'll be happy to explain it again.)
That does not mean his Father did not have a physical body at that time.

Notice,
it does not say ...the Word, which was flesh, came and dwelt
among us... or anything of the sort.
...and, there are numerous Bible passages that personify God.
--


~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~