Judy, you seem to see "sinister" where none exists. You argue that Paul moved on in spite ofhis willingness to observe continued Jewish custom (ala Acts 21.) On previous occasions, you have argued that Paul honored Torah. Which is it -- in what light should we consider(contextually speaking)
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:25:45 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, you seem to see "sinister" where none exists.
I wrote nothing "sinister" JD
You argue that Paul moved on in spite ofhis willingness to observe
continued Jewish custom
(ala Acts 21.)
He did this so as
As, "context" has nothing to do wtih whoi wrote what? I give up
Jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:25:45 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, you seem to see "sinister" where none exists.
I wrote nothing
From NT Wright -- some comments that might help to put Paul and his thnking into a broader context. jd
And the minute you think youve got him taped, Here are his central ideas, bang, bang, bang, youve made him boring, and Paul is never, ever boring. Now of course Jewish interlocutors - and
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:05:52 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From NT Wright -- some comments that might help to put Paul and his
thnking into a broader context. jd
And the minute you think youve got him taped, Here are his central
ideas, bang, bang, bang, youve made him
5 matches
Mail list logo
