Wed, 9 Apr 2014 22:23:52 +0200
Cédric Krier cedric.kr...@b2ck.com:
On 09 Apr 09:22, fernan...@lgdmh.com wrote:
Moreover, I really doubt that such tests will be of any help
because the current missing testing part is the human interaction
and I doubt any test which is not performed by human
On 09 Apr 2014 22:23:52 UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote :
On 09 Apr 09:22, fern...@lgdmh.com javascript: wrote:
Thank you for the info, I see that automatic gui testing would not
provide
in tryton all the benefits that I expected.
There is one room where I see some testing will be good,
On 08 Apr 12:16:14 UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 08 Apr 00:17, fern...@lgdmh.com javascript: wrote:
Do you have any insight about this whole client functional testing
thing?
For me, it is really not a priority because as you already said the
behavior is already tested using proteus
On 09 Apr 09:22, fernan...@lgdmh.com wrote:
Moreover, I really doubt that such tests will be of any help because the
current missing testing part is the human interaction and I doubt any
test which is not performed by human will help there.
Also, you should know the the client code is a
