Hi Mark,
is http://bitbucket.org/mramm/tg-21/ now the official development
version of TG2? If yes, can you give me push access (my bitbucket name
is cito)? Or can I just continue to commit to the SVN trunk of TG2?
Greetings,
-- Christoph Zwerschke
Mark Ramm schrieb:
Yea, that's the official development version for 2.1.
I'll give you push access. And for those who don't have push access,
feel free to branch make changes, and then ping this list for one of
us to merge your changes back in.
Ok, thanks.
But what about issue tracking?
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:
Regarding the issue with parameters not being stripped from the
validation - you also have a very valid point there. I don't know my way
around HG so I don't know who put the comment there that the update of
the parameters is needed for some routes-reason - but
Christoph Zwerschke schrieb:
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:
Regarding the issue with parameters not being stripped from the
validation - you also have a very valid point there. I don't know my way
around HG so I don't know who put the comment there that the update of
the parameters is needed
Christoph Zwerschke schrieb:
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:
It failed massively for me, but after pulling the tip things are down to
one error:
ERROR: tg.test_stack.rendering.test_rendering.test_jinja_base
http://paste.chrisarndt.de/paste/b6930eca278d4c6fac102fe9a4e36a9c
Did you already
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:
BTW, how do you run the tests?
I used
python setup.py test
and while that works, it clutters my working-copy with a huge number of
egg-directories.
This probably happens if you haven't installed the core-testing
requirements under site packages.
--
Sure, that would work, and would probably get us up and running on the
new server sooner. Let's see what elpargo has to say about all this
as he was working on this stuff before he left for vacation ;)
--Mark Ramm
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Christoph Zwerschke c...@online.de wrote:
Hmm, I think the plan has been to move trac and hg to the new server
eventually and have trac conect to hg directly again then.
I feel somewhat conflicted about this. I like that bitbucket keeps
track of branches for us, and that it makes it easy for anybody who
wants to to publish new
Mark Ramm schrieb:
Hmm, I think the plan has been to move trac and hg to the new server
eventually and have trac conect to hg directly again then.
But then we will lose the links to the svn revisions in the old tickets.
Wouldn't it be cleaner to set up a separate trac connected to hg for
