Sure, that would work, and would probably get us up and running on the new server sooner. Let's see what elpargo has to say about all this as he was working on this stuff before he left for vacation ;)
--Mark Ramm On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <c...@online.de> wrote: > > Mark Ramm schrieb: >> Hmm, I think the plan has been to move trac and hg to the new server >> eventually and have trac conect to hg directly again then. > > But then we will lose the links to the svn revisions in the old tickets. > Wouldn't it be cleaner to set up a separate trac connected to hg for > TG2, without all the old tickets, and keep the old trac connected to svn > for work on the TG 1.x branch? > > -- Christoph > > > > -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
