Thanks. I hope we can then finish the Trac migration this weekend.
-- Christoph
Am 24.03.2011 05:08 schrieb Mark Ramm:
That should be fixed now. Rabbitmq failures at the time of the ticket
entry meant they were in mongo but not solr.
New updates to allura should mean this will never happen
On 24/03/2011 04:21, Michael Pedersen wrote:
Before I talk about the future, I'd like to look at the past a little bit.
TurboGears has a good history. It's one of the older web frameworks in
the Python world, and it managed to have a decent following for a long
time. You can see that by
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Paul Rigor paul.ri...@uci.edu wrote:
Do you think mailing list traffic is proportional to TG2 usage? We haven't
contacted the ML once we've deployed our web applications. Our group uses TG
heavily and perhaps being quite means everything is working just fine
Flexibility has diluted the main appeal of TG - simplified WEB development.
When I started with TG1 there was only 1 set of documentation so there
was no way to get derailed by the subtle differences between branches.
Assuming 1.0 docs would work in 2.0 or 2.1 is problematic.
The original
I think at the end of this thread, there should definitely be an
announcement to the main list regarding these future plans.
And Michael, for what it's worth, I think you plan sounds just about
perfect, with the exception of you forgetting to mention the CI stuff. :)
Kevin Horn
On Thu, Mar 24,
