On 9/22/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 gazillion on not wasting your voluntary effort for TG on supporting
this outdated piece of crap. If customers want support for IE6 they
should pay for it BIG TIME.
I'm 100% with Chris on this one. This template is mostly going to be
On Mon, 2008-22-09 at 08:02 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 gazillion on not wasting your voluntary effort for TG on supporting
this outdated piece of crap. If customers want support for IE6 they
should pay for it BIG TIME.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:15 PM, iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, good to know, thanks for the feedback. I think in the interest of
timeliness what I will do is to try to establish the basic html
structure, layout, class, and id guidelines, and make the TG template
pages first so
iain duncan wrote:
So I'm thinking I could:
- write the core assuming that the standards compliant box model is in
effect
+1 gazillion on not wasting your voluntary effort for TG on supporting
this outdated piece of crap. If customers want support for IE6 they
should pay for it BIG TIME.
