Hi, Jeremy.
Can we make the loaderRegistry "protected" instead of "private" in
ComponentTypeLoaderExtension.java? The sub-class may need to access it, for
example, delegate to the registered ComponentTypeElementLoader to parse
"componentType" element.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message
On 5/24/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The NOTICE file doesn't include mention of Woodstox or JSON-RPC-Java and all
the stuff included with the Celtix binding - Spring, Jetty, ActiveMQ (thats
a pre-Apache release right?), and all those Sun jars (which presumably we
really are allowed to
On May 24, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 5/24/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the explanations.
I can help to port/develop the implementation/componentType
loaders. As the
first step, I'm trying JavaImplementationLoader and
JavaComponentTypeLoade
On 5/24/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the explanations.
I can help to port/develop the implementation/componentType loaders. As the
first step, I'm trying JavaImplementationLoader and JavaComponentTypeLoader.
Here're a few more questions/comments:
1) ComponentType
Hi,
Thanks for the explanations.
I can help to port/develop the implementation/componentType loaders. As the
first step, I'm trying JavaImplementationLoader and JavaComponentTypeLoader.
Here're a few more questions/comments:
1) ComponentTypeLoader.load(...) should take DeploymentContext in a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-427?page=comments#action_12413181
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-427:
Is the change in TextUtil.txt really the right solution? A better question is
do we really need to have the copyright header
jmarino: so Raymond, I checked in some skeletal code last night
[11:15am] rfeng: yes, I did a brief reading
[11:16am] jmarino: k good .did you also have a chance to take a look
at the Groovy extension?
[11:16am] rfeng: so the basic idea is to model a set of spring beans
as a composite?
[11:16
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-186?page=all ]
Brent Daniel updated TUSCANY-186:
-
Attachment: commandgroup.txt
CommandFactory was addressed earlier. This patch addresses CommandGroupFactory
> Need APIs for CommandFactory (and probably Com
On 5/24/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Jim/Jeremy.
I don't see XXXImplementationLoader (except SystemImplementationLoader) any
more in the sandbox code. Are they just not implmented or do we now have a
new model to populate the implementation metadata based on the bean
propertie
Hi Raymond,
Comments inline...
On May 24, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jim/Jeremy.
I don't see XXXImplementationLoader (except
SystemImplementationLoader) any more in the sandbox code. Are they
just not implmented or do we now have a new model to populate the
implementation
Hi, Jim/Jeremy.
I don't see XXXImplementationLoader (except SystemImplementationLoader) any
more in the sandbox code. Are they just not implmented or do we now have a
new model to populate the implementation metadata based on the bean
properties for the implementation class?
I don't see Tusc
Jim, this would be unmanaged code, not in a component, so it doesn't look
like there is any API for this. The idea of TUSCANY-417 is an interactive
JavaScript shell along the lines of what Jeremy described as a "first-class
client environment for JavaScript".
...ant
On 5/24/06, Jim Marino <[E
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-427?page=all ]
Fuhwei Lwo updated TUSCANY-427:
---
Attachment: TestUtil.txt
Once StaticSequenceNoEmfTest.java in sdo/tools project is executed,
TestUtil.txt patch is needed for the test to work.
> Test case fil
Test case files need to end with TestCase to be executed
Key: TUSCANY-427
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-427
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: Java SDO Implementation, Java SDO Tools
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-426?page=all ]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-426:
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Null pointer exception loading schema with ref to already defined type
> -
Null pointer exception loading schema with ref to already defined type
--
Key: TUSCANY-426
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-426
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: C++ SDO
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-425?page=all ]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-425:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 409180.
> The conversion for Xpath "@Property" is not being resolved to "Property" as
> per Spec
> -
Can you explain why you need the list of components? For managed code
(i.e. in a component) the spec defines a way to get the metadata
associated with a module.
Jim
On May 24, 2006, at 1:30 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've a J2SE client that needs to get a list of all the components
defined in
On 5/24/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its for this: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-417. Which would
be based on the Rhino shell: http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/shell.html, which
to quote from that site provides "... an interactive environment for
exploratory programming.".
Its for this: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-417. Which would
be based on the Rhino shell: http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/shell.html, which
to quote from that site provides "... an interactive environment for
exploratory programming.".
Ideally the shell environment would be configured
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-425?page=all ]
Hasan Muhammad updated TUSCANY-425:
---
Attachment: XPathBug_NewFiles.jar
This attachment contains the testcase and resource files.
> The conversion for Xpath "@Property" is not being resolved
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-425?page=all ]
Hasan Muhammad updated TUSCANY-425:
---
Attachment: xpath_bug.patch
The fix is in DataObjectUtil class where the XPath is being processed
> The conversion for Xpath "@Property" is not being re
The conversion for Xpath "@Property" is not being resolved to "Property" as per
Spec
Key: TUSCANY-425
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-425
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bu
On 5/24/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've a J2SE client that needs to get a list of all the components defined in
the current module, is that possible? There used to be the getMetaData
method but thats been removed now. If there is no easy way right now could
i add something?
The s
+1 From me too. ... come on folks, Lets get the vote
out :-)
Kevin Williams wrote:
> +1
> BB and DAS stand-alone samples still look good on XP
and OS X
>
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I created source and binary distributions of the
latest Tuscany
>> Milestone 1 release candid
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-419?page=all ]
Venkatakrishnan updated TUSCANY-419:
Attachment: tuscany-sca-tools patch 24-May.txt
tuscany-sca-plugins patch 24-May.txt
Hi... here are a couple of patches that will be req
I've started work in the sandbox on improving the JSON-RPC binding so that
it supports server components invoking functions on the client browser by
using externalService definitions.
I'm wondering what to do with this now, should it replace the old JSON-RPC
binding, should i move it from the san
The NOTICE file doesn't include mention of Woodstox or JSON-RPC-Java and all
the stuff included with the Celtix binding - Spring, Jetty, ActiveMQ (thats
a pre-Apache release right?), and all those Sun jars (which presumably we
really are allowed to be distributing?)?
Reading about the NOTICE file
I've a J2SE client that needs to get a list of all the components defined in
the current module, is that possible? There used to be the getMetaData
method but thats been removed now. If there is no easy way right now could
i add something?
...ant
+1
Dan
On Monday 22 May 2006 13:39, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I created source and binary distributions of the latest Tuscany
> Milestone 1 release candidate level (SVN revision r408581) and placed
> them in my home directory:
> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-
30 matches
Mail list logo
