[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-800:
Attachment: JIRA-800-Mar23-Amita.jar
Hi Luciano,
Please see the note included in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1191:
Attachment: XMLWithoutSchemaTest.java
Updated version of test with bugs fixed.
Test case for
Hi,
When promoting a component reference to the composite level, the specs says
that if an interface is specified in the composite reference it must be a
superset of what is specified for the component reference that is being
promoted. To do this I reused the CheckCompatibility method in the
On 3/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
For example, the variant implementation of the assembly model has a
number of changes that coupled with what you describe above will
basically require a re-write of kernel.
I have not
Improve SCA SDO databinding serialization performance
-
Key: TUSCANY-1194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1194
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Hmm, I'm using 2.0.4. I'll upgrade and see if that fixes it.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 23/03/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the same thing as Raymond (except for the timestamped api), What
maven
release you are using ? I believe Raymond and I are using maven-2.0.5.
--
Luciano
I think we should hold off calling this IPMC vote till we can show the IPMC
that we've made a bit of progress on the community issues being discussed on
other threads. Hopefully that wont take too long.
...ant
On 3/25/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you all.
This vote is
Kelvin,
Did you update? I fixed a problem in DataGraphResourceImpl.
Frank.
kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/26/2007 09:35:53
AM:
Frank,
I don't see any failures with any of the other samples, but I'm still
having a problem with the ObtainingDataGraphFromXml. I'm currently
It's looking great and show good progress... I'll update my sandbox with
this patch.
I'll try to look into the issues you mentioned and send some updates
later...
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3/26/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Luciano,
Yes, it is
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tag for TSSS demo code
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:35:24 +0100
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/26/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tag for TSSS demo code
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity.
We've some tough things to work out over the next days and
+1
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
On 3/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to
+1
On 26/03/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
On 3/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow
On 3/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/26/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Simon,
You get this error, when one or more of the eager init web services fail to
start. If you debug the exception thrown, will include the causes for the
eager init failure.
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Simon,
I had had the same problem than you. I solved it starting ActiveMQ
first.
The final steps are:
1 - Donwload ActiveMQ:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/active
mq/apache-activemq/4.1.0-incubator/apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator.zip
2 - uncompress it
On 3/24/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/24/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I give up on this, and I'll try not bring this subject up anymore
!!!
Don't give up, its important to get to the build we think is the best for
Tuscany.
I think the crux of the
+1
On 3/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity.
We've
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing
+1
On 26/03/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity.
We've
+1
On 3/26/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 26/03/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in
+1 from me.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me.
On 3/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's
posts. When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I really think. I hope
nobody is going to slam me :-)
I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need
to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for any of us to
maintain our dignity.
Frank.
kelvin goodson
Touché :)
On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I really think. I hope
nobody is going to slam me :-)
I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need
to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for
ant elder wrote:
On 3/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
For example, the variant implementation of the assembly model has a
number of changes that coupled with what you describe above will
basically require a re-write of kernel.
I
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Touché :)
On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I really think. I hope
nobody is going to slam me :-)
I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need
Hi,
By reading through a bunch of e-mails on this mailing list and adding my
imagination, I put together a conceptual diagram at the following wiki page
to illustrate the kernel modulization.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Kernel+Modulization+Design+Discussions
This
On 3/26/07, Antollini, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
I had had the same problem than you. I solved it starting ActiveMQ
first.
The final steps are:
1 - Donwload ActiveMQ:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/active
On 3/26/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
By reading through a bunch of e-mails on this mailing list and adding my
imagination, I put together a conceptual diagram at the following wiki
page
to illustrate the kernel modulization.
Hi,
I'm poor with colors :-(. I was trying to use different colors to represent
related pieces.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Tuscany kernel
+1
On 3/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Touché :)
On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I really think. I
hope
nobody is going to slam me :-)
I think Ant's
Sorry for late replies Simon, I am offsite in India for the next two weeks.
Regarding the SCDL, there was a post earlier in the list with the SCDL (from
me). You can use the calculator scdl in core-samples and remove the client
component, also each component needs to be targeted with a
+1.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 3/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance Be Nice policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors
On 3/27/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for late replies Simon, I am offsite in India for the next two
weeks.
Regarding the SCDL, there was a post earlier in the list with the SCDL
(from
me). You can use the calculator scdl in core-samples and remove the client
35 matches
Mail list logo
