[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1706) Change binding dispatch code to eliminate redundant object creations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1706. --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied under r576055. Thanks. Change binding dispatch code to

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1705) Incorrect WS-Addressing header for callback endpoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1705. --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied under r576055 Incorrect WS-Addressing header for

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1536) Implementation type for XQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1536. --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied under r576059. Vasil, thank you for the contribution.

Please apply TUSCANY-1705 patch to the 1.0 branch

It looks like Raymond has applied this patch to the trunk but not to the 1.0 branch. Please can someone apply it to the 1.0 branch. I have built and tested it with the branch. Simon Simon Nash wrote: I have created a patch for TUSCANY-1705 that also resolves TUSCANY-1706. (The code changes

Re: Build issue with implementation-bpel module

Hey Ray This seems something with surefire, not sure exactly what yet I'll get back to this in the morning... On 9/15/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I ran into an issue in the implementation-bpel module from the top-down build. The error message is as follows. But if

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1712) Remove $callback$ prefix from services exposed by callback references

Remove $callback$ prefix from services exposed by callback references - Key: TUSCANY-1712 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1712 Project: Tuscany Issue

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1712) Remove $callback$ prefix from services exposed by callback references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1712: Attachment: patch1712 Please apply this patch to the trunk and also to the 1.0 branch. Remove

Please apply patch for TUSCANY-1712 to the trunk and 1.0 branch

I have posted a patch for TUSCANY-1712. The change is small and all the tests pass. Can someone please apply this patch to the trunk and to the 1.0 branch. Thanks. Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1626) Samples missing diagrams

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1626: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0) Java-SCA-Next Deferring minor defects to

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1646) Web Service binding doesn't handle wsdli:wsdlLocation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1646: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0) Java-SCA-Next Deferring minor defects to

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1347) IndexOutOfBoundsException thrown when trying to locate a service that includes a callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1347: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0) Java-SCA-Next Deferring minor defects to

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1539) The assembly model does not contain the annotated intent information

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1539: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0) Java-SCA-Next Deferring minor defects to

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1686) Cannot throw business exceptions across the Web Service binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder closed TUSCANY-1686. -- Resolution: Fixed Patches are applied so this can be closed now Cannot throw business exceptions

Blocking defects against 1.0 release: TUSCANY-1658

The JIRA http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1658 is marked as critical and so is blocking the 1.0 release right now. Is anyone working on it or know what its status is? I'll be lowering the priority and deferring it unless someone says something. ...ant

Re: Build issue with implementation-bpel module

I'm get a similar build failure related to surefire in the 1.0 branch: [INFO] Configured Artifact: org.apache.ode:ode-dao-jpa-ojpa-derby:1.1:zip [INFO] Expanding: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\.m2\repository\org\apache\ode\ode-dao-jpa-ojpa-derby\1.1\ode-dao-jpa-ojpa-derby-1. 1.zip into

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1487: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0) Java-SCA-Next No way this will make 1.0

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1558) Exception starting Web Service if business method declares an exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder closed TUSCANY-1558. -- Resolution: Fixed Tried the suggested recreate and the move up to Axis2 1.3 has fixed the problem

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1702) WSDL generated on Websphere contains an error at the end

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1702: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next WSDL generated on Websphere contains an error at the end

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1679) PBVInvoker always uses service-side classloader to deserialize ... also doesn't handle checked/business excs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1679: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next PBVInvoker always uses service-side classloader to deserialize ...

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1711) Reference a ws with complex data type...

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1711: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next Reference a ws with complex data type...

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1680) Need a way to detect that PBR can be used when building reference-side binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1680: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next Need a way to detect that PBR can be used when building

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1678) Would like to improve performance by not doing a PBVInvoker.copy in a couple cases where it's unnecessary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1678: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next Would like to improve performance by not doing a PBVInvoker.copy in

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1681) DataObject2XMLStreamReader can't handle a null (or could this be an SDO bug??)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-1681: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next DataObject2XMLStreamReader can't handle a null (or could this be an

Re: Blocking defects against 1.0 release: TUSCANY-1658

I am working on it (as well as TUSCANY-1653). I have fixed the Tuscany java2wsdl module and verified that the output is correct. I am now working on the runtime WSDL generation in binding-ws-axis2 and I expect to have a patch for both of these later today. Simon ant elder wrote: The JIRA

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

Guys, there's a *lot* of development and code changes still going on in the 1.0 branch but hardly any sample and doc fixes happening . I know everyone wants to get their last minute fixes in but there will be other releases after 1.0 . If we don't review and fix the samples, build scripts and doc

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, there's a *lot* of development and code changes still going on in the 1.0 branch but hardly any sample and doc fixes happening . I know everyone wants to get their last minute fixes in but there will be other releases after 1.0 . If we

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead of SCAdomain? To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly? Currently things do:

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build. Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get? ...ant

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead of SCAdomain? To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly? Currently things do:

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build. Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get? ...ant yep, will do. Just building again now Simon

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build. Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get?

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1712) Remove $callback$ prefix from services exposed by callback references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1712: - Assignee: Raymond Feng (was: Simon Nash) Remove $callback$ prefix from services

Re: Please apply TUSCANY-1705 patch to the 1.0 branch

I have merged the changes into the branch locally. But I need some time to commit it. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 1:15 AM Subject: Please apply TUSCANY-1705 patch to the 1.0

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1712) Remove $callback$ prefix from services exposed by callback references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1712. --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied under r576320. I'll merge it into the 1.0 branch as well.

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1713) The WSDL-less feature doesn't honor the XSD type information in the SDO parameter/return type

The WSDL-less feature doesn't honor the XSD type information in the SDO parameter/return type -- Key: TUSCANY-1713 URL:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs - Key: TUSCANY-1714 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement Components:

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] haleh mahbod reassigned TUSCANY-1714: - Assignee: haleh mahbod Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] haleh mahbod updated TUSCANY-1714: -- Attachment: simple-bigbank.zip Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] haleh mahbod updated TUSCANY-1714: -- Attachment: simple-bigbank-spring.zip attached two zips, one for simple-bb and one for

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1702) WSDL generated on Websphere contains an error at the end

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1702. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-1714: Assignee: Venkatakrishnan (was: haleh mahbod) Cleanup of Simple-BB and

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-1714: Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-1.0 Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring

OSGi implementation extension build error

I'm getting a build error in implementation-osgi module in the 1.0 branch. Anybody else getting the same error? testOSGiComponent(org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.osgi.invocation.OSGiPropertyTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.152 sec FAILURE! junit.framework.ComparisonFailure:

sample calculator-distributation exception..

Following the README posted, I did the following in different command windows: 1) ant runDomainNode .. starts fine 2) ant runNodeB ... Fails with the following exception trace. Buildfile: build.xml runNodeB: [java] Sep 16, 2007 10:40:30 AM org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.SCANodeImp l

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1714) Cleanup of Simple-BB and Simple-BB-Spring READMEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkatakrishnan resolved TUSCANY-1714. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks for the patch. Applied to 1.0 branch and the trunk.

Re: sample calculator-distributation exception..

On 9/16/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following the README posted, I did the following in different command windows: 1) ant runDomainNode .. starts fine 2) ant runNodeB ... Fails with the following exception trace. Buildfile: build.xml runNodeB: [java] Sep 16, 2007

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1715) Incorrect tuscany namespace for implementation.spring

Incorrect tuscany namespace for implementation.spring - Key: TUSCANY-1715 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1715 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1715) Incorrect tuscany namespace for implementation.spring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1715. - Resolution: Fixed Incorrect tuscany namespace for

Re: OSGi implementation extension build error

If that helps, it is a random error. Happens every 3 or 4 build for me. Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'm getting a build error in implementation-osgi module in the 1.0 branch. Anybody else getting the same error?

WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 Bouncycastle issues

Hi, The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be bouncycastle's classes doing the work. In the past there had been

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder closed TUSCANY-1500. -- Resolution: Fixed As far as i can tell these patches have now been applied so closing this. Thanks

Re: WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 Bouncycastle issues

On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be

Re: WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 Bouncycastle issues

On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be

Re: WS-Security in WS Binding Axis2 Bouncycastle issues

ant elder wrote: On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1276) Support SCDL schema validation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1276. - Resolution: Fixed This is now fixed, see the SVN commit history

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-678) Java XSD files cannot be used to validate SCA Model

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-678. Resolution: Fixed This is now fixed, see TUSCANY-1276 for the resolution.

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

Simon Laws wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead of SCAdomain? To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly?

Using Node/Domain API, was: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

Simon Laws wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead of SCAdomain? To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

Simon Nash wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead of SCAdomain? To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new

Re: Including the XQuery sample in the next release?

[snip] Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I believe I have a fix now. First, in the XQueryImplementationProvider, we should set the SAXON databinding for the services/references of the componentType (implemention) instead of the component. And then we need to make sure inline schema of the WSDL

Re: svn commit: r576198 - in /incubator/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.0/modules/node-api/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/node/smaller: ./ SCADomain.java SCANode.java

Is the release branch really the place for something like this? How about a sandbox? ...ant On 9/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jsdelfino Date: Sun Sep 16 15:21:15 2007 New Revision: 576198 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576198view=rev Log: Strawman

Re: Including the XQuery sample in the next release?

Hi, I'm almost ready to merge it in. Don't worry, I'll handle it as my next thing. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Including the XQuery sample in

Re: Build issue with implementation-bpel module (related to OPENJPA-256)

Let me try to give a little background here. Initially I was having the same issue as the one described in OPENJPA-256 [1] and to workaround the issue, we started configuring surefire to use System Class loader. Looks like this solves the problem building the module itself, but building the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

implementation.bpel build issue --- Key: TUSCANY-1716 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1716 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA BPEL Implementation Extension

Sample implementation-composite fails in a top-down build of 1.0 branch, but it's passing in the module-only build

Hi, I'm seeing the following test failure in the implementation-composite sample with a top-down build but it's passing if I build the module alone. Any clue? Thanks, Raymond --- T E S T S

Re: Sample implementation-composite fails in a top-down build of 1.0 branch, but it's passing in the module-only build

I see the same issue On 9/16/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm seeing the following test failure in the implementation-composite sample with a top-down build but it's passing if I build the module alone. Any clue? Thanks, Raymond

Re: Sample implementation-composite fails in a top-down build of 1.0 branch, but it's passing in the module-only build

On 9/17/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see the same issue On 9/16/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm seeing the following test failure in the implementation-composite sample with a top-down build but it's passing if I build the module alone. Any

Fwd: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

This is raised as a blocker so whats peoples feelings on it? I'd like bpel to get in 1.0 as well but what should i do tomorrow morning if this is still unresolved? Defer the JIRA or hold the RC vote till tomorrow evening in the hope that will be time to find a resolution? ...ant --

Re: svn commit: r576198 - in /incubator/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.0/modules/node-api/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/node/smaller: ./ SCADomain.java SCANode.java

You're right, it's probably not the right place for this :) I moved it to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/sca/node-api/smaller. ant elder wrote: Is the release branch really the place for something like this? How about a sandbox? ...ant On

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

Hi, I found a fix for this problem: using surefire plugin version 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT which fixes http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-322. It's not perfect to reference SNAPSHOT versions but I think it's OK as a workaround to run the test case. I'll check in the fix if there is no

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead of SCAdomain? To save digging around in

Re: SCA 1.0 RC1 artifacts available for review

On 9/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A question though is should we flip the samples

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

Could you apply to trunk at least ? Then we could verify we are not seeing the issue anymore, as it looks like your stackTrace and the one from Ant and myself are different. On 9/16/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I found a fix for this problem: using surefire plugin version

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

Luciano Resende wrote: Could you apply to trunk at least ? Then we could verify we are not seeing the issue anymore, as it looks like your stackTrace and the one from Ant and myself are different. On 9/16/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I found a fix for this problem: using

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: Could you apply to trunk at least ? Then we could verify we are not seeing the issue anymore, as it looks like your stackTrace and the one from Ant and myself are different. On 9/16/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I found

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1704) Message SPI and associated interfaces need cleanup before 1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-1704: --- Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino Message SPI and associated

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1717) Clean up EndpointReference and ReferenceParameters SPI

Clean up EndpointReference and ReferenceParameters SPI -- Key: TUSCANY-1717 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1717 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1704) Message SPI and associated interfaces need cleanup before 1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527927 ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1704: - Marking 1704 as resolved. Opened TUSCANY-1717

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1704) Message SPI and associated interfaces need cleanup before 1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1704. - Resolution: Fixed Message SPI and associated interfaces need cleanup

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1716) implementation.bpel build issue

Hi, I'm OK either way. Just want to point out that the scope of the SNAPSHOT reference will be only for that module and it will be used for the build time. There are usually SNAPSHOT versions of plugins involved in maven build especially when the mvn prefix:goal command is used. Thanks,

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1658) Dynamically generated WSDL does not generate wsdl:output if method has void return

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1658: Attachment: patch1658 This is a patch for both TUSCANY-1658 and TUSCANY-1653. I'm not 100%

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1718) One contribution exported it's namespace and was imported by two contribution ,gets assembly error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] wangfeng updated TUSCANY-1718: -- Attachment: ContributionTestCase.zip If you run the testcase,please modify the field's value in

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1640) Consolidate extended provider SPI interfaces into base interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1640. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed. I merged ReferenceBindingProvider2 and

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1562) Service method's throws Exception clause create problem at time of on fly generation of wsdl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1562. - Resolution: Fixed The test case in jira1562 now works. Service