[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2043.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I have put some changes in to solve the immediate issue. In particular the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan closed TUSCANY-2044.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by Raymond. The recent build has gone thro for this module.
BUILD FAILURE : Apache Tuscany SCA Multiple WSDL File Support Integration Tests
---
Key: TUSCANY-2046
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2046
Project: Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2046:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
BUILD FAILURE : Apache Tuscany SCA Multiple WSDL File Support
Address FIXME in SCABindingProcessor constructor
Key: TUSCANY-2047
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2047
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569262#action_12569262
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2046:
-
Have updated the itest/wsdl-multiple to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2047:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Address FIXME in SCABindingProcessor constructor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2047.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Changes applied referring to this JIRA
Address FIXME in
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51065projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 04:04:02 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 05:03:09 -0800
Total time: 59m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51065projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 04:04:02 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 05:03:09 -0800
Total time: 59m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2042:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Dynamically generated WSDL not generating output message for void
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-2042.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51091projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Building
Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 07:06:27 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 08:04:19 -0800
Total time: 57m 51s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51091projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Building
Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 07:06:27 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 08:04:19 -0800
Total time: 57m 51s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi Simon,
yes, with version 1.1 it works fine. I also readded the test with contribute
to Apache flag set.
Thanks a lot for your effort!
Bye,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Simon Laws (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 16:22
An: Stucky,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-2028.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
Java-SCA-1.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569295#action_12569295
]
Daniel Stucky commented on TUSCANY-2028:
Yes, I tested it with version 1.1 the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Stucky updated TUSCANY-2028:
---
Attachment: test.zip
Readded for test integration
Conversation does not continue if a
I have created a JIRA to track this issue, and will try start some
investigation on this area.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2048
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 8:21 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the following thread [1] there was mentioned that we might want to
I have created a JIRA to track this issue :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1525
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:57 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/02/2008, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to give user (svkrish) more karma towards the Tuscany build
Given that this interface allows an Invoker to implement an
allowsPassByReference method, could we rename PassByValueAware to
PassByReferenceInvoker?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Fri Feb 15 12:26:39 2008
New Revision: 628163
URL:
John Hunt wrote:
Dear All,
I have a question around SCA and Java embedded in a database. How
feasible is it to embedded SCA within say the Java VM running within an
Oracle database, either to provide a service or as a client to call a
service.
I have a scenario in mind that goes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-sebastien,
Qualified = target namespace?or wsdl name?
Say my wsdl is named aaa.wsdl do I reference it by http://aaa ?
Sorry for the slow response. I have been out sick for the last few days.
The following definitely works. Other things might work as well,
On Feb 15, 0008 4:09 PM, Continuum VMBuild Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51091projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Building
Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 07:06:27 -0800
Finished at:
Raymond Feng wrote:
My preference is to keep PassByValue as the prefix for the following
reasons.
1) The invokers implement this interface only for the cases to enforece
pass-by-value for remotable interfaces. Invocations over local
interfaces (pass-by-reference) don't even care about this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
clemens utschig updated TUSCANY-2049:
-
Attachment: WSDLModelResolver.java
fix is attached (search for // cutschig - nodeMap )
I got the dynamic wsdl import to work, thx guys -
however, the wrong namespace is still sent out to the webservice and hence
causes the error reported.
/clemens
-Original Message-
From: Simon Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:58 PM
To:
Sorry for the delay in responding. I have been out sick for a few
days and I am just getting back to my Tuscany mail. Comments inline.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Comments inline.
Simon Nash wrote:
Well, I think the smart installer approach will be a nightmare. We
had a similar
ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All,
I've spotted there's no FAQs for using Tuscany with Weblogic, so I
thought I'd throw something together to help :)
Over on my blog:
Luciano Resende wrote:
I guess we have couple scenarios here :
- Considering contribution A importing a java package from
Contribution B, we can have the componentType in either Contribution
A(supported today) or contribution B (not working: TUSCANY-1873).
- We can also consider Contribution A
How about something like DataPassingStyle or DataPassingStrategy?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r628163 - in
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
In the WAR-based Tuscany deployment, the TuscanyServletFilter is
responsible to start/stop the SCADomain. At this moment, most of our
itest cases create the SCADomain using SCADomain.newInstance() during
the setup. If we run itests as a webapp, it ends up with two
Raymond Feng wrote:
How about something like DataPassingStyle or DataPassingStrategy?
This is not a big issue and I would not seriously -1 any name even if
you just called it the XyzStyle but I'd like to understand why we'd use
a different term from the term used in the spec, and if we did,
It's not a big deal and I'm not good at naming :-). I agree with you that we
should be able to explain it to extension developers for the name we pick
(maybe a good javadoc will help:-).
My understanding is that the SCA spec uses allowsPassByReference to
customize the data exchange sementics
The last 2 weeks I've been working with the contribution processing code
and am bumping into the following issues:
- ContributionImpl is tied to a ClassLoader
- ModelResolver as well, and it seems to be used to resolve classes in
some cases.
- We're now using a special
We have multiple tuscany extensions (implementation types) that has
it's Implementation implemented by extending componentType in order to
re-use some common code. During resolve phase, we have code in
ExtensibleModelResolver to find the proper resolver based on the
interfaces of the
Hey,
Absolutely, feel free to copy/translate/whatever you need to do with
it, though it'd be nice if you could still link back/acknowledge me in
some small way ;)
Just for my 2p on the weblogic situation I agree that the META-INF
directory is the wrong place for the composite files to live
37 matches
Mail list logo