On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/4 ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Currently the trunk has a version of 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, we need
to
remove incubating at
Ant,
+1 in general - by why not simply choose a number, rather than x?
- the problem with x is what comes next?
Yours, Mike.
ant elder wrote:
Lots of different views so far on this thread, better than no one replying
:) I'm tempted to go with 1.x-SNAPSHOT as I think from whats been said
I was trying to use a reference with multiplicity (see composite
below), and looks like the reference is being populated with two
references for the same component, instead of one reference for each
component. Any ideas why this is happening ?
BTW, I'm using the Eclipse Plugin from 1.2 release
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was trying to use a reference with multiplicity (see composite
below), and looks like the reference is being populated with two
references for the same component, instead of one reference for each
component. Any ideas
I guess part of problem here is because a lot of people assume that
the maven artifact version represents what is going to be our next
release and then, if it's set as 2.0-SNAPSHOT, it means our next
release would be 2.0. But I tend to take these two pieces as two
different things, the maven pom
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess part of problem here is because a lot of people assume that
the maven artifact version represents what is going to be our next
release and then, if it's set as 2.0-SNAPSHOT, it means our next
release would be
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to keep updating the trunk pom
version. And this would probably make everybody happy :)
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:14 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:05 AM,
It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there
has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the
right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last
couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602951#action_12602951
]
Daniel Stucky commented on TUSCANY-2343:
Hi Rajini,
as suggested I debugged the
+1 from me. Incidentally I've spent a bit of time over the last couple of
days trying all the various samples and demos etc with the latest trunk code
and its all looking in quite good shape so it does seem like a fine time to
be taking a release branch.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:21 AM,
That seems a little odd to me, i'd prefer just snapshot, 1.x, or the
actual next number over 1.5.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602965#action_12602965
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-2343:
-
Daniel,
Thank you for doing this. I
Hi, I just wanted to let people know officially that people from Red
Hat/JBoss will be getting involved with Tuscany over the coming months
as we look at the best way in which to provide SCA support for our SOA
Platform users. We're very excited about helping on Tuscany and
complimenting
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Mark Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to let people know officially that people from Red
Hat/JBoss will be getting involved with Tuscany over the coming months as we
look at the best way in which to provide SCA support for our SOA Platform
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Mark Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to let people know officially that people from Red
Hat/JBoss will be getting involved with Tuscany over the coming months as
we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Rutherford closed TUSCANY-2372.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Upgrading JDK to 1.6.0_05 or later seems to fix this issue.
On 6/5/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here the processor would never throw ContributionReadException, when the
exceptions are blocked as most of the ContributionReadException are of
type1, 2 or 3.
Do you mean type 2, 3 4 here. I still expect us to throw type 1
exceptions.
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Mark Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to let people know officially that people from Red
Hat/JBoss will be getting involved with Tuscany over the coming
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602993#action_12602993
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2274:
One interesting part of this is it rarely
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to keep updating the trunk pom
version. And this would probably make everybody happy :)
On
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I have the following method in my service interface that uses binding.ws:
T Bean1T getTypeUnbound(T[] anArray);
I am getting the following exception in SCADomain.newInstance()
Please open a JIRA for this, with a test case.
Simon
I've made all the changes required in the tag [1] to get rid of the felix
jars, find and include the emf jars, and I've removed the incubating tag,
DISCLAIMER files etc. However, I'm currently stumped as to why two emf
jars available [2] and [3] don't get downloaded by the build. The build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603010#action_12603010
]
Daniel Stucky commented on TUSCANY-2343:
Hi Rajini,
Thanks again for your help !
Done. TUSCANY-2373.
++Vamsi
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I have the following method in my service interface that uses binding.ws:
T Bean1T getTypeUnbound(T[] anArray);
I am getting the following exception in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated TUSCANY-2373:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2373-testcase.patch
TUSCANY-2373-testcase.patch: A
Hi Simon,
After disabling most of the exceptions, now i face a problem in the itest
validations as we generally check for the last reported problem to verify
the results. Now due to disabled exception the processing continues furthur
and more problems are reported even after the one we are
ant elder wrote:
+1 from me.
+1 from me also. Seems like a good time.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2347:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2347-Part4.patch
Removing the exception throws from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2347:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2347-Part5.patch
Removing the exception throws from the
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
After disabling most of the exceptions, now i face a problem in the itest
validations as we generally check for the last reported problem to verify
the results. Now due to disabled exception the processing continues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603038#action_12603038
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-2343:
-
Daniel,
Now that is good progress,
Simon Nash wrote:
I did a recent svn update and rebuild and I'm seeing the following test
error from the helloworld-bpel sample. Are other people seeing this?
Any ideas?
Simon
I have committed a fix (or at least a workaround) for this build
break problem. The revision number is r663938.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
I did a recent svn update and rebuild and I'm seeing the following test
error from the helloworld-bpel sample. Are other people seeing this?
Any ideas?
Simon
I have committed a fix (or at least a
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
I did a recent svn update and rebuild and I'm seeing the following test
error from the helloworld-bpel sample. Are other people
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:55 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
We can also look at doing an official ASF press release, a couple of
examples are the Synapse ones at [1] and [2]. We probably want to wait till
we have the website migrated to the TLP before sending that out but I'll
Hi All,
Here is the more detail regarding error...
I have trace the error and found that exceptino source is from method
getInitialContext() of
org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.JMSResourceFactory
Here is the complete stack trace
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
I did a recent svn update and rebuild and I'm seeing the following test
error from the helloworld-bpel sample. Are
I have 2 services defined in a composite as,
component name=BComponent
implementation.java
class=org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.wsbinding.nowsdl.soapversion.impl.BServiceImpl/
service name=BService
interface.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2371:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng (was: Vamsavardhana Reddy)
Databinding tests for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2361:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Databinding tests for primitives and primitive arrays - local
This is very good news. Welcome !!!
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's fantastic to see you folks come on board. Welcome!
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Mark Little [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06,
Did you try the workaround I mentioned before on this thread [1] where
I added a new repository ? It was actually for other jars, but might
help in this case as well...
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg31727.html
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL
Run as Tuscany fails if workspace folder has name with space
-
Key: TUSCANY-2374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2374
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
I guess that would be me as the fix I did outlined another issue (as
described in the thread Luciano pointed at). So you guys expect to always
have all the tests passing on trunk all the time?
Cheers,
Matthieu
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Hi Luciano,
yes, I added that workaround, and that satisfied most of the EMF jars,
but not these two. It's odd, the 2 jars we need are there in the repository
you suggested, but maven will not download them.
Kelvin.
2008/6/6 Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you try the workaround I
Hi Adriano,
Yep, they should be imported, if you check inside its folders, there are
the
eclipse project files, so they should be identified by the eclipse import
tool as an eclipse project.
Yup, you're right - there are indeed Eclipse files inside the folders. I
guess I was confused by
Hi Oscar,
Yup, you're right - there are indeed Eclipse files inside the folders. I
guess I was confused by the different names in [1] than those that result
[2] from importing to an Eclipse workspace - after which I see 13 projects
in both cases. So please ignore my previous remark.
I have added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603160#action_12603160
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2371:
---
I applied the 1st patch and fixed a bunch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2361.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied under r664103. Thanks,
Databinding tests for primitives
Also, the namespace convention does not match to the section 2.3.2 of
WS Binding Spec V1.0, saying:
The target namespace of the WSDL document, and of the service, ports
and generated binding elements is:
Base System URI for HTTP / Component Name / Service Name
Gilbert
On Fri, Jun 6,
Mark Little wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to let people know officially that people from Red
Hat/JBoss will be getting involved with Tuscany over the coming months
as we look at the best way in which to provide SCA support for our SOA
Platform users. We're very excited about helping on Tuscany and
Did you try mvn -U ?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:18 AM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Luciano,
yes, I added that workaround, and that satisfied most of the EMF jars,
but not these two. It's odd, the 2 jars we need are there in the repository
you suggested, but maven will not
vtest to test generated wsdl
Key: TUSCANY-2375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2375
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
Affects Versions:
This was raised a few weeks ago here on this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg31241.html
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Gilbert Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, the namespace convention does not match to the section 2.3.2 of
WS Binding Spec V1.0, saying:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to keep updating the trunk pom
version. And this would probably make everybody happy :)
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:14 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri,
I found that I needed to make a few small changes to the
ContributionContentProcessor to handle contributions with no
sca-contribution.xml, like existing regular JARs for example.
I've been able to use regular JARs in an SCA domain with the following
changes:
- define
Add Atom-GData binding extension
Key: TUSCANY-2376
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2376
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Java SCA ATOM Binding Extension
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Douglas Siqueira Leite updated TUSCANY-2376:
Attachment: tuscany2376_douglas_2008_06_06.patch
The dependencies at pom
Hi Oscar,
I say that it is more difficult to debug because you need attach a source
code to each jar and etc, and when you are using projects, eclipse already
knows where to find the source code : )
The reply made sense to me, especially with regards to the fact that with
the Android plugin
I have started to define the structure and some classes to allow the GData
binding, as discussed above.
This project was created following the binding-atom-abdera project
structure. So there is some dependencies that need to be revised.
The initial created classes aim to handle with the
I am not intimately involved in day to day coding and I am not attached to
any of the branches or the names :) So, take this comment as a 3rd person's
point of view.
1.x relays the message that 1.0 and incremental releases of 1.0 are spawned
off of this version of the code.
2.x relays the
61 matches
Mail list logo
