ant elder wrote:
Trying to run Tuscany WebApp samples in WebSphere i get a NoSuchMethodError:
javax/wsdl/Operation.getExtensibilityElements()Ljava/util/List. Anyone know
how to fix that? This is with the class loader set to "Classes loaded with
application class loader first".
...ant
You n
Comments inline.
Simon Nash wrote:
Well, I think the smart installer approach will be a nightmare. We had
a similar approach in M2 and people didn't like it.
The M2 approach was very different from what I was proposing. M2
downloaded everything on demand at runtime. A smart installer would
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Thanks. I will ask Sebastien then :)
I'm an administrator on project Tuscany but:
- you are not in the Tuscany continuum group
- I don't have seem to have authority to perform any user admin tasks
Can you ask one of the continuum user administrators, here's the list:
h
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Dealing with the 'appliesTo' attribute in PolicySets has been a subject that
I ended up discussing on the thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27768.html. I
have gone forward with a suggestion that Sebastien sounded off on that
thread and
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 8:55 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for the other items, If we have TuscanyServletFilter and
TuscanyTestServletFilter, it would only work for the iTests, as they
have generated web.xml. If we want to have simmilar aproach o
Clemens Utschig - Utschig wrote:
> shouldn't an do it, so that I could potentially store the wsdl
> anywhere ..
>
> I'll try that later today - thx for the advise..
>
You don't even need an include, just place the WSDL file anywhere inside
your SCA contribution (JAR or folder), reference its q
Clemens Utschig - Utschig wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have a simple composite as below - which makes use of SDO through SOAP in
> the reference
>
>
> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0";
>targetNamespace="/model/common/"
>
> xmlns:dbsdo="http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/data
Raymond Feng wrote:
As the first step, I fixed the code (r619973) to tolerate the case that
junit is not present on the classpath. Now the webapp samples should be
working as-is now.
How about the following refactoring?
1) Create a new module as "host-webapp-junit" under "modules" folder. (I
Raymond Feng wrote:
+1 on the proposal.
The interceptor could just return the flag based on its capability
without asking the next one. And the runtime can query it from the head
in the invocation chain and stop when it gets a true.
It could, but that would be making an assumption on the b
ant elder wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 5:30 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to run our sample webapps, and realize that they are all
requiring jUnit as dependencies, even when there is no test available.
This might be a side effect of our effort to automate the run of
iTests
Mark Combellack wrote:
[snip]
* Are other people seeing this problem with the
itest/databindings/sdogen iTest?
SVN revision r619725 just built OK for me.
* How can I force the Continuum server to do a build?
You need to create a continuum account [1]. Then once we add your
acco
Luciano Resende wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 3:28 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
When we run a Tuscany application with binding.ws in the J2SE (w/ embedded
Jetty or Tomcat), the base URI of the service binding is
http://locahost:/. If we package the same artifacts into a WAR and
deplo
Raymond Feng wrote:
One more question:
Do you think if the participants to enforce PBV know their data
capability upfront (static) or do they have to defer the decision to the
actual invocation time (dynamic)? It seems that you were leaning to the
dynamic style in your proposal.
Static, per
ant elder wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One other consideration - sometimes it's appropriate to reply to a
JIRA rather than updating the issue: if there are two lists, on has to
decide - should the replies go to both or just dev?
In such a case I thin
sebb wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Or can we configure JIRA to only send a message when a comment is added
to an issue?
Surely one needs all the JIRA changes?
You're right, I was initially thinking that we could cut on the number
of useless JIRA notifications, but after review
Raymond Feng wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
I was initially th
Raymond Feng wrote:
I was initially thinking about the interceptors. But I realized that
service binding providers usually don't add an interceptor to the
invocation chain. Instead, they register a listener to the binding
protocol layer to route the call into SCA. If the service provider
recei
Raymond Feng wrote:
Let me try to propose the following fix:
1) Add new interface such as PassByValueProvider (please help me with a
better name) to the SPI.
public interface PassByValueProvider {
/**
* Indicate if the provider will enforce the pass-by-value semantics
*/
boolean
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Reading the composite file / building its model / re-writing it to
finally apply the xpath sounds very complicated.
As an application developer I'll write the appliesTo xpath to match what
I see in a composite XML file. Why can't we simply run t
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Typically these discussions have multiple aspects to it and we end up
bringing perspectives to each aspect. If there is such a topic then I'd
think the WIKI is a good place. There could be one description of the
problem and comments by the community at various points. S
Richard Featherstone wrote:
Hi,
The output shows that the
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.FolderContributionPackageProcessorTestCase
has errors, have a look there.
If you only want to get the build done don't run the tests
-Dmaven.test.skip = true
R
- Original Message --
Scott Kurz wrote:
OK, just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed a discussion on how to do
this with dynamic SDOs.
You know, one issue I noticed when looking at this with static SDOs is
the way that SDO makes it hard for you
to programmatically go from static SDO to XSD. Looking at the SDO
sourc
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
From the history of this mail, I suspect that you haven't got my post in
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27575.html. I am
certainly eager to fix this. Let me know your thoughts on what I have
asked there. Thanks.
Sorry, it's weird, I never
Scott Kurz wrote:
When you wrote:
>
- The generator should use the databinding metadata (including any
knowledge of handwritten XSD representing the business data and
generation capabilities like the SDO XSDGenerator) to generate proper
XSD in the WSDL.
How were you thinking a particular XSD w
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
- route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu
I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but
I'd like to make the case that it does have value for new developers
(though not for
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be
used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if the
Workspace Admin should also be able to test this sort of a ping per
binding. Is this something that can go into the sectio
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I have checked in my changes.
Your changes break the build for me as they require Maven 2.0.6. Our 1.1
release worked with Maven 2.0.5.
I'm installing the latest Maven (2.0.8) now but what do people prefer?
- continue to work with 2.0.5 and later
- 2.0.6 and later?
-
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 5:04 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have a question about the implementation of the "wsdlless"
deployment
function.
The issues I see are occurring in a couple of places within the
life-cycle.
Namely, deployment, bind
Mike Edwards wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
Let's chat some more about objectives, to see why we're seeming to look
at this differently:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I was thinking about the following binary distro zips:
- tuscany-core.zip - The base that everybody needs.
cor
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2008/2/3, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There's a lot i think the project could do to encourage others to
participate, here's a few things I can think of -
We have a lot of downloads and real users, we need to try to get more of
these pe
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
I'm leaning more towards what Mike is suggesting.
OK it doesn't look like we're reaching a consensus as at least two
people don't seem to like the scheme I proposed.
I take it back then, forget about my proposal, but I still think that a
single download containing al
Matthieu Riou wrote:
I'm happy to see this discussion going and I think most of the points listed
make a lot of sense.
A small detail to add to the list that I think could have some importance:
your -dev list is flooded by Jira issues. Newcomers interested in Tuscany's
development are very likel
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
- Why did you need two authentication and wsAuthentication intents? is
it because you needed different policy sets on the client and service
side?
Yes, that's the reason. Since the policysets encapsulate things like the
use
Raymond Feng wrote:
The binding-specific exception/fault mapping won't be exposed to the
programming model. I was proposing to make the mapping extensible so
that we can support multiple patterns without impacting the SCA
application code.
[snip]
Scott Kurz wrote:
I agree that this is where t
Scott Kurz wrote:
Some examples of what I meant..
For the service instance I'm invoking I'd like to know:
* target JVM is it the same as the client instance? (is this a
"Node" in Tuscany terms?, sorry of my ignorance)
* target classloader (if it's not the same or a child I can't do PBR)
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
From what you are saying a short term shopping list of functions seems to be
emerging.
Contribution uploader/manager(via browser)
Contribution addition/management from command line (adding as Luciano has
started this and useful for testing)
Workspace to register added co
Lou Amodeo wrote:
This is a request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute
as a first class attribute on its associated bindings model object.
This request is based on a requirement to provide support to implement a
late-endpoint resolution capability for service references when
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
If the request message is part of a transaction when would we expect the
transaction to be committed or rolled back - when the consumer starts the
worker thread or after the service has been invoked on the worker thread?
...ant
After
Simon Nash wrote:
See inline.
Simon
Scott Kurz wrote:
I was looking over the runtime Java2WSDLHelper code to get some
understanding of it.
After we build the WSDL with the call to: builder.generateWSDL();
I was wondering what we're doing post-gen to the WSDL types section?
What's the cod
Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 5:04 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have a question about the implementation of the "wsdlless"
deployment
function.
The issues I see are occurring in a couple of places within the
life-cycle.
Namely, deployment, binding start, and service defin
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
As of today, we can add multiple interceptors to the invocation chain,
but we cannot control their ordering.
Is that a problem?
When more policies are supported,
I see a need to provide some simple ordering mechnisim for interceptors.
[snip]
Do you have a specific
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm looking at copying the 1.1 release artifacts up onto the new
distribution infrastructure at
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
We need to make a decision about how this will be structured. As a default I
assume we stick pretty much with what we have already (see
http://archive
Raymond Feng wrote:
A quick update: I managed to get the automation working with Geronimo
2.0.2 too using the geronimo-maven-plugin. The new pom.xml has been
updated at the wiki page.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, Febr
Mike Edwards wrote:
[snip]
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
- smaller packages
- easier for people to find what they need
I agree with the objectives. The second of the two is more important
from my perspective.
I was thinking
Simon Laws wrote:
A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the
IPMC Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating RC3 VOTE thread on general@
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html
The follow changes have been made to create RC3a
- where possible remove the w
Type: Bug
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
Reported on tuscany-dev in http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-dev&m=120170144819429
The maven-incremental-build so
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
The model in my sandbox [2], which is very simlar to the XML that the
current contribution repository uses, now holds node and contribution name
information [3]. These could be two separate models to decouple the
management of contributions from the process of associating
sebb wrote:
[snip]
Sebastien pointed us toward Spring as another example which, for the
framework, has the slightly different pattern
?-binaries
?-binaries+dependencies-src-samples
Spring provides another package with the binaries, samples and docs,
without dependencies [1], but I was not try
Continuum VMBuild Server wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=43145&projectId=277
My fault, sorry, I didn't realize that my IDE had compiled the class and
mvn didn't recompile it. I just fixed the issue and restarted a build.
--
Jean-Sebasti
I've seen changes to the implementation-bpel and new itests. Could
somebody give a high level bullet list of what's supported now?
In particular are references supported and are there any limitations in
that support?
Thanks.
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
sebb wrote:
Seems to me it would be useful to create a binary archive without any
of the external jars.
This would considerably reduce the size of the archive.
Most of the jars are likely to remain the same between releases anyway.
+1
Many projects do that (Spring for example), you can down
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
How about the following as some first steps.
1. Disengage the Node from the domain in the way that it is connected at the
moment leaving the Node able to load Contributions and start composites as
it does currently in stand alone mode. Doing this we remove the sca
appl
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 7:47 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used?
Ah I'm happy to see tha
: Bug
Components: Java SCA Integration Tests
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Environment: RHEL 5
JDK 1.6
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
The contribution class loader test case incorrectly uses reflection to invoke
methods on
: Java SCA Axis Binding Extension
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Environment: RHEL 5
SUN JDK 1.6
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
Exception running test case with JDK 6. I've renamed the test to FIXME for now
to allow builds on JDK
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
- Why did you need two authentication and wsAuthentication intents? is
it because you needed different policy sets on the client and service
side?
Yes, that's the reason. Since the policysets encapsulate things like the
username, password callback hander etc. which cou
More comments inline :)
Raymond Feng wrote:
I'm a bit confused by that your statement in :
6. Mark http://store#store as deployed. Store has a reference to a
CurrencyConverter service (from composite http://cloud#cloud which is
not in my domain yet) so it shows a red-x and appears disabled.
In
Some more input on steps 7 and 9.
I agree with your other comments (snipped out to keep this short).
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
7. Upload cloud.jar, find deployable composite http://cloud#cloud in
it, mark it deployed. The red-x on deployed composite
http://store#store is now gone.
We should
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used?
Ah I'm happy to see that there are not so many packaging schemes after
all :)
We've already started to discuss contribution us
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Would it be possible to add an OSGi manifest header into these zip files so
that the zips can be directly installed into an OSGi runtime? The entries
will not have any impact when used without OSGi.
+1
The only issue would be the
creation of these entries. We have two op
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 5:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If this is mainly about reducing the size of the download
[snip]
No
I'm puzzled by this. One of the two goals at the start of this thread was
"smaller packages".
I'm
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
If the request message is part of a transaction when would we expect the
transaction to be committed or rolled back - when the consumer starts the
worker thread or after the service has been invoked on the worker thread?
...ant
After.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Scott Kurz wrote:
The binding-feed code suggests a way to deal with JIRAs 1678,1680.
That is, the mediator is called directly from within the binding
implementation,
rather than relying on the DBInterceptor being set up on the wire at
Composite start time with a static DB transform established at
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 9:31 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
- Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
A & B seem to be the two primary schemes. A variation of option A is
that we package all the jars (as utility jars) into an EAR so that JEE
applications can use Tuscany/SCA.
Can you help me understand what you meant by: "so that JEE applications
can use Tuscany/SCA"?
A
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
Would each distro include everthing it needs or is tuscany-core.zip a
prereq?
tuscany-core is a prereq. That's what I meant with "tuscany-core - The
base that everybody needs."
Where do all the different data bindings go?
Some in tuscany-core, some in tuscany-web,
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
- tuscany-jee.zip - For JEE app integration
EJB, RMI and JMS bindings, Spring components
I think we should have WS binding in tuscany-jee.zip as WS is part of
JEE. (Maybe -jee should be a superset of -web).
JEE like other platforms supports Web Services but I
Simon Nash wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
- What distro Zips are we building and what do they contain? just the
runtime? samples or not? dependencies or not? are we building
specialized distros for different use cases?
[snip]
With a big topic like this, dividing it into se
Simon Nash wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
- Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
[snip]
With a big topic like this, dividing it into separate threads makes it
easier for people to foll
Simon Nash wrote:
[snip]
- Does the app developer need to know what Tuscany and dependency JARs
are required by his SCA contributions?
- Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
- Which containers are we
Simon Laws wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3/
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1998.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Works for me in RC3.
> Can't do a full bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560585#action_12560585
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1997:
-
I am abl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-1997:
---
Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Axis binding does not al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-2000.
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
I can't reproduce this issue
Simon Laws wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC2/
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/
T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560056#action_12560056
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1998:
-
I'm seeing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559963#action_12559963
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2000:
-
Could you please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559148#action_12559148
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1993:
-
Can you please
Simon Nash wrote:
[snip]
a) runtimes of various kinds (SCA standalone, embedded within Tomcat,
etc)
[snip]
b) applications, containing only the code and other artifacts
required for the application itself
[snip]
Drop contribution jars into a directory which are then picked up
automatica
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559101#action_12559101
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1993:
-
You're g
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
We only ship one pre-built war now (sample-calculator-webapp.war). We
removed the others to reduce the size of the distribution. Why do we
retain
this one?
I don't know, but that doesn't usually stop me having an opinion :-)
Perhaps it is useful to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558859#action_12558859
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1989:
-
The prebuilt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558857#action_12558857
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1989:
-
Tried again fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558850#action_12558850
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1989:
-
I will try agai
I think we should mark JIRAs that we're fixing as Resolved, and Close
then only after we verify that the resolution fixes the issue in the
next RC.
If we mark them Closed right now they'll be out of the verification
radar screen in the next RC and we will forget to verify them.
See what I ju
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
[snip]
I used Tomcat 6.0.14 to test the sample webapps, could people help test
them on other platforms too, Jetty, Geronimo, WebSphere etc?
I tested the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1976.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Marking resolved as it is actually resolved in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino reopened TUSCANY-1976:
-
Reopening until the fix is available in an RC.
> Ant build error
SCA Samples
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Environment: WebSphere 6.1.0.9
Linux RHEL5
Tuscany 1.1 RC1
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-1.1
Steps to reproduce the problem:
- ant package in the helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp module to build the
SCA Samples
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Environment: WebSphere Application Server 6.1.0.9
Linux RHEL5
Tuscany 1.1 RC1
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-1.1
Steps to reproduce the problem:
- use ant package to build the helloworld-dojo sample
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558775#action_12558775
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1989:
-
The WAR built
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Environment: WebSphere Application Server 6.1.0.9
Linux RHEL5
Tuscany SCA 1.1 RC1
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-1.1
Steps to reproduce the problem:
- follow the
Continuum VMBuild Server wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=37962&projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 13 Jan 2008 14:03:00 -0800
Finished at: Sun 13 Jan 2008 14:30:40 -0800
Build break in ite
Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Environment: Daily build
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-1.1
See
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=37962&projectId=277
Error in the osgi-implementation itest, breaking the daily build.
I t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-1987:
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Build break in osgi-implementat
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
Beyond performance, I don't think svn stat is good way to handle the
case that the project has been updated from svn but the build is not run
yet. I now ported the timestamp check from the maven-compiler-plugin and
it should give us the capability to be incremental.
Simon Laws wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
[snip]
If you do find issues with the release candidate that you think need
to be fixed and lead to a -1 please review and fix them in the 1.1 branch
or raise jira's targeting the 1.1 release.
[snip]
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-1.1
The 1.1 RC1 CHANGES file contains incorrect support statements:
- BPEL references are not supported yet as far as I know.
- binding.jsonrpc cannot be used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-1979:
---
Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Missing Ant script
401 - 500 of 3461 matches
Mail list logo