changes to the annotation processing to allow just specifying
@Autowire on the param.
Jim
On Jul 15, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim/Ignacio,
There is abstract called WorkScheduler in the SPI, that hides whether
you are using a JCA or commonj work manager. The two
Rick,
I have held back from this discussion as I am not as actively involved
with Tuscany as most of you, though I do keep a keen eye on what is
happening. There are a lot of us who are watching the evolution of SCA
with a great deal of interest and especially Tuscany, with it being the
only
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 July 2006 21:18
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Component start order
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
First, eagerness is associated with the scope, not an initializer
callback, IMO.
Jim, would this mean there would
Hi,
I have been trying in vain to build chianti for the last couple of days
:-( it consistently fails at the same place. I tried clearing my sandbox
and maven repo and trying to download the dependency on which it is
failing manually, no luck. I would appreciate it someone had any useful
pointer,
Jeremy,
Sorry, I might have missed some previous emails. I am getting the
following error consistently with the build,
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Tuscany JAXB Data Binding
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
for Revolutionaries [was: M2]
On Jul 11, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Thanks Raymond. I tried the build around four or five times. I shall
try a few more times.
I wiped the Sun plugin from my repo
$ rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/com/sun/tools
and tried rebuilding the databinding-jaxb module
Jeremy,
I can't find the required version of the plugin on the java.net repo? Is
it version 1.0 or 2.0EA3?
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Meeraj Kunnumpurath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 July 2006 02:13
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: Chianti, was: Rules
Jeremy,
This maps on quite well with some of the other implementations I have
seen. For example, in Mule they have the concept of connectors that
provide transport level abstractions which are decoupled from the UMOs
(a.k.a services). Mule uses its own message routing mechanism to
associate a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-527?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath updated TUSCANY-527:
Attachment: jsr237.jar
Jeremy,
I can't find it on the Maven repo. I have attached the one I used. This was
built from the source files I got
Apologies, this is a test message. For some reason, the mail server
seems to be blocking my messages as spam.
*
You can find us at www.voca.com
*
This communication is confidential and
First cut of the work scheduler implementation
--
Key: TUSCANY-527
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-527
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Components: Java SCA Core
Reporter: Meeraj Kunnumpurath
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-527?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath updated TUSCANY-527:
Attachment: workmanager.jar
First cut of the work scheduler implementation
--
Key
Jim,
Are you ok for me to start looking at the work manager implementation?
Once I get a better understanding around the requirements of callbacks,
I can try to give some input on that as well.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Meeraj Kunnumpurath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06
Ok, Jeremy.
Ta
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2006 14:33
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
Are you ok for me to start looking at the work
.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
Are you ok for me to start looking at the work manager
implementation
ok
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2006 15:46
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 7, 2006, at 7:37 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jeremy,
Should this go into sca/core. Also, have you got any
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2006 15:41
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 7, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Also, we may find other use cases for using a work manager
to support in the
API.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Sent: 07 July 2006 15:55
To: 'tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Support for callbacks
JSR-237 was not part of 1.4
True, I don't think it is part of JEE 5 either. Weblogic 9.1 does
provide
That sounds ok.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2006 17:27
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 7, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jeremy,
Ok, having a brief look at the JCA work
. Feel free to jump in on anything you would like. Input on
callbacks would be welcome as well.
Jim
On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
Are you ok for me to start looking at the work manager implementation?
Once I get a better understanding around the requirements
I have been looking at TestNG lately. It is lot better than Junit 3.8.1.
However, I think lot of those features are incorporated in Junit 4.0. I
am not sure about the Maven support for TestNG.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2006 02:10
To:
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:04 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Good point. I think a similar mechanism may be o.k. as long as we
clean up properly when the request ends or the thread is reclaimed
(e.g.
in case of failure where the callback
Hi,
I have been away from the list for a few weeks. I am back on now looking
at things in general.
Before I disappeared, I was looking at the Groovy container and spaces
binding. I would like to continue working on them. I think Jim has
refactored the Groovy container in the sandbox to fit in
we didn't scare you off quite yet ;-) Comments inline.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 1:26 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
I have been away from the list for a few weeks. I am back on now
looking at things in general.
Before I disappeared, I was looking at the Groovy container and spaces
binding
Raymond,
You can get the type of T if you have a parameterized field of a generic
type. Some thing like this,
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.ParameterizedType;
public class TestT {
private TestString myField;
/**
* @param args
*/
public
DECLARATION.
It'll be very interesting if template/generic INSTANTIATION info can be
found given only one .class file each type.
On 6/28/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/06, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond,
You can get the type of T if you have
Jim,
I din't think WLS 8.1 is certified for Java 5.
Ta
Meeraj
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: support on WebLogic and WebSphere?
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:42:00 -0700
Hi Andrew,
Doesn't the new version of WAS
Jean,
I am not sure what state is this in now. I have been working on a spaces
binding for asynchronous calls. I am also interested in looking at JMS
binding. I would appreciate it, if you could please share your thoughts
on this.
Thanks
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Sebastien
You need to register the qualified name for the binding with the Stax
loader registry.
-Original Message-
From: Rashmi Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 June 2006 14:50
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: ConfigurationLoadException: Unrecognized element
.. for a new
@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: ConfigurationLoadException: Unrecognized element
.. for a new binding type
On 6/1/06, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to register the qualified name for the binding with the Stax
loader registry.
Meeraj is spot on. We don't register
--
Key: TUSCANY-435
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-435
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Reporter: Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Attachments: binding.spaces.jar
First cut of the spaces binding for entry points and extrenal
Spaces binding for SCA
--
Key: TUSCANY-435
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-435
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Reporter: Meeraj Kunnumpurath
First cut of the spaces binding for entry points and extrenal services
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-365?page=comments#action_12383377
]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath commented on TUSCANY-365:
-
Is it worth looking at having a generic JSR-223 container.
Java SCA Container for Ruby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-317?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath updated TUSCANY-317:
Attachment: container.groovy.zip
Refactored to use the extension support classes from core.
Ta
Java SCA Groovy Container
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-317?page=comments#action_12378841
]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath commented on TUSCANY-317:
-
Seems to be wrong version of asm, if you have asm 2.2 higher up in the
classpath, the test seems to be working
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-329?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath updated TUSCANY-329:
Attachment: GroovyImplementationLoader.java
This is the groovy implementation loader now loos like.
Simplified extension API improvements
Hi,
Could someone pls point me to the Eclipse code style templates for
Tuscany?
Ta
Meeraj
*
You can find us at www.voca.com
*
This communication is confidential and intended for
the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-317?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath updated TUSCANY-317:
Attachment: container.groovy.zip
Jean,
I have attached the first cut of all the source files. I have been building
from Eclipse, haven't got
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-329?page=comments#action_12378405
]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath commented on TUSCANY-329:
-
I noticed this working on the Groovy container. There was significant code
duplication in the extension classes
Thanks Jim.
I didn't notice the support classes in common. I will have a look at it
today.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marino (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 May 2006 13:38
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-329) Simplified extension API
Hi,
I have written a Groovy container for Tuscany. Is it worth submitting?
Kind regards
Meeraj
--
___
Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number. -Lycos Yellow Pages
Java SCA Groovy Container
-
Key: TUSCANY-317
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-317
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Reporter: Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Priority: Minor
SCA Container for running Groovy scripts
Hi,
Has anyone noticed out of memory error in the build due to insufficient
perm gen space?
Ta
Meeraj
*
You can find us at www.voca.com
*
This communication is confidential and
/msg02130.html
AccountServiceImpl
Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone noticed out of memory error in the build due to
insufficient perm gen space?
Ta
Meeraj
*
You can find us at www.voca.com
story sometime soon
(if you would like to help for Tuscany, just jump in by proposing some
ideas to the list).
Does the first way of packaging outlined above meet your needs?
Jim
On May 1, 2006, at 1:46 PM, meeraj kunnumpurath wrote:
Thanks Jim.
I was also thinking about how an SCA deployment
include themselves into a module).
Let me know if you run into issues with the existing approach or
have ideas on making things better.
Jim
On May 1, 2006, at 7:44 AM, meeraj kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please shed some light on the expected behaviour
when more
201 - 246 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
