Ignacio, I have a couple of questions. Sorry, I may be talking rubbish without any context.
I think for local callbacks to happen asynchronously a work manager based approach may be appropriate. However, on other scenarios, wouldn't the callback implementation be specific to the binding. For example, with a JMS binding, it could be something using replyTo and correlation id headers. I think the key would be to define the right abstractions for callbacks in general and have binding specific realisations. Also, we may find other use cases for using a work manager for deferred executions. Do we have any view on how the runtime can use a work manager from a managed environment when Tuscany is run in a managed environment. I think app servers that support work managers, may be making them available through the JNDI namespace or something else. I would appreciate if you could point me to any more info on the callback discussion, if available, in addition to the email thread that has been running. Many thanks Meeraj -----Original Message----- From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 July 2006 14:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Support for callbacks I too think that having a work manager implementation that minimizes dependencies (e.g., Geronimo's) is a useful thing to have. Wrt using a work manager in the support for callbacks, we should just make sure that we are ok with the overall architecture first. At his point, it looks like the local case could use a work manager, but not necessarily the remote case. I am working on a couple of scenarios (of the technology kind, as Jim refers to them) that illustrate the main steps so that we can get a better idea of how the architecture can fit in support for callbacks in general. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:32 AM Subject: Re: Support for callbacks > On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote: > >> Jim, >> >> Are you ok for me to start looking at the work manager implementation? >> Once I get a better understanding around the requirements of >> callbacks, I can try to give some input on that as well. >> > > Meeraj, please do, this would be a good thing to have. > -- > Jeremy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. ***************************************************** You can find us at www.voca.com ***************************************************** This communication is confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. You should not disclose its contents to any other person. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender named above immediately. Registered in England, No 1023742, Registered Office: Voca Limited Drake House, Three Rivers Court, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, WD3 1FX This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
