, as I said in my
previous email on this subject. What do you (or others) think
about this?
Simon
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
I wasn't asking for an official policy statement on this, and
I wasn't suggesting that we stop all innovation and move into a
phase where we only work on things that were part of M1.
By releasing M1, we moved from a phase of
On Jul 19, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
I wasn't asking for an official policy statement on this, and
I wasn't suggesting that we stop all innovation and move into a
phase where we only work on things that were part of M1.
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
Comments inline below.
Simon
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
I wasn't asking for an official policy statement on this, and
I wasn't suggesting that we stop all innovation and move into a
phase where we only
Hi Jeremy,
On 7/18/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms
: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch for databinding was: Re: Moving chianti to trunk
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
I have a big patch for the databinding as attached
Venkat
On 7/18/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms 1.0
wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms 1.0-SNAPSHOT like the SDO tree.
I expect to complete
(or others) think
about this?
Simon
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms
wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms 1.0-SNAPSHOT like the SDO tree.
I expect to complete
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy, I have two patches one in SDO-Impl and another in SCA-Tools
(Java2WSDL tooling) that need to be reviewed and applied to M1+.
The Jiras
are Tuscany-535 and Tuscany-120 respectively. But then they are
to applied
over M1+.
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I can run the all the test cases successfully using mvn clean
install. Can you post me the stacktrace?
I commented out the test bodies. If I uncomment them I get:
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.061
on this subject. What do you (or others) think
about this?
Simon
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I
-
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch for databinding was: Re: Moving chianti to trunk
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I can run the all the test cases successfully using
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I ran into this issue once inside Eclipse but cannot reproduce it
any more. It's probably related to some settings of the SAX/DOM
features on namespace handling. I'll investigate.
What JDK do you use? I tried IBM and SUN JDKs and both
to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms 1.0-SNAPSHOT like the SDO tree.
I expect to complete this tomorrow or possibly Wed if there are
build issues
: Moving chianti to trunk
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I ran into this issue once inside Eclipse but cannot reproduce it any
more. It's probably related to some settings of the SAX/DOM features on
namespace handling. I'll investigate.
What JDK do you use? I tried IBM
On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
Can you try this patch? It seems that in your environment the SAX
XMLReader may have a different feature settings on namespaces or
namespace-prefixes. With the patch, I enforce them by:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms 1.0-SNAPSHOT like the SDO tree.
I expect to complete
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
I have a big patch for the databinding as attached. It includes
code improvements, more transformers and test cases. Please review
and apply.
I applied this but it is a big large to review easily - can you break
down what
20 matches
Mail list logo
