Ok then, let's move to the modules directory for now, as we will need to
release it anyway on our next release. When the time arrives and we need to
re think the spec module location, then we revisit the case.
On 4/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Luciano Resende
Raymond Feng wrote:
Good points. I agree it's probably better to keep it at sca/spec level.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Venkata Krishnan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: Build update, was: SCA source
But we probably want to release 2 things, sca-spec and sca, right ? and then
in subsequent releases of sca, we are only going to release sca, unless the
spec changes and we need to update sca-spec jar.
On 4/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Good
[snip]
Luciano Resende wrote:
But we probably want to release 2 things, sca-spec and sca, right ?
and then
in subsequent releases of sca, we are only going to release sca,
unless the
spec changes and we need to update sca-spec jar.
[snip]
I could be convinced, but I'm not sure I
