Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-27 Thread ant elder
I couldn't work out from your mail exactly how you see doing all this. Could you say what wsdl extensions you propose and which of the wsdl classes they contain? Thanks, ...ant On 8/26/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agree that a common web services extension would be good for

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-26 Thread ant elder
Resurrecting this old thread...I'd still like for something to happen here, could we do something like the web services foundation extension archiveKen suggested. I know it doesn't solve all the problems brought up in this thread but its a better than duplicating wsdl code across different

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-26 Thread Jim Marino
Agree that a common web services extension would be good for things like parsing the web services binding but I think sca/idl should not be changed (since other idls may be used instead of wsdl). Also, sca.wsdl should only have things related to WSDL contracts, with web services in a

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-08 Thread Venkata Krishnan
: Subject:Re: Web services infrastructure Hi, I think it makes a lot of senses to extract the common layer. Axis2/Celtix/JAX-WS can be treated as three dialects to the WS binding. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Ken Tam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-08 Thread Jim Marino
: Web services infrastructure Hi, I think it makes a lot of senses to extract the common layer. Axis2/Celtix/JAX-WS can be treated as three dialects to the WS binding. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Ken Tam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-08 Thread Ken Tam
\webservice diretory ? Cheers, Jervis -Original Message- From: Raymond Feng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8/8/2006 (星期二) 6:38 上午 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Subject:Re: Web services infrastructure Hi, I think it makes a lot of senses to extract the common

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-08 Thread Venkata Krishnan
: Raymond Feng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8/8/2006 (星期二) 6:38 上午 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Subject:Re: Web services infrastructure Hi, I think it makes a lot of senses to extract the common layer. Axis2/Celtix/JAX-WS can be treated as three dialects to the WS

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-08 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Ken Tam wrote: It seems like binding.ws belongs as one extension, of which there are multiple implementations (which would be packaged and deployed separately). I'm not sure nesting (either via inclusion or containment) is the right approach though -- since you

Re: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-07 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, I think it makes a lot of senses to extract the common layer. Axis2/Celtix/JAX-WS can be treated as three dialects to the WS binding. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Ken Tam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:25 PM

RE: Web services infrastructure

2006-08-07 Thread Liu, Jervis
: Raymond Feng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8/8/2006 (星期二) 6:38 上午 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Subject:Re: Web services infrastructure Hi, I think it makes a lot of senses to extract the common layer. Axis2/Celtix/JAX-WS can be treated as three dialects to the WS binding