On 8/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I moved all the jars from calculator-webapp to tomcat/lib.
calculator-webapp
runs fine. What else is there that might cause a
On 8/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I worry we'd not get anything other than 1/ done by tomorrow and even
then
the READMEs etc would have bugs. So my preference would be for 0.99do 1/
On 8/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I worry we'd not get anything other than 1/ done by tomorrow and even
then
the READMEs etc would have bugs. So my preference would be for 0.99 do
1/
for the big webapps but keep the small prebuilt ones. The
demo-bigbank was having ant issues as well.
On 8/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I worry we'd not get anything other than 1/ done by tomorrow and even
then
the READMEs etc would have bugs. So
On 8/24/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
demo-bigbank was having ant issues as well.
On 8/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I worry we'd not get anything other than 1/ done by
On 8/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
demo-bigbank was having ant issues as well.
On 8/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support for
implementation.web.
For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the
0.99 release.
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
1 - what is in the war
I moved all the jars from calculator-webapp to tomcat/lib. calculator-webapp
runs fine. What else is there that might cause a problem?
Haleh
On 8/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll start a different thread to discuss
On 8/23/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I moved all the jars from calculator-webapp to tomcat/lib.
calculator-webapp
runs fine. What else is there that might cause a problem?
Haleh
On 8/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL
On 8/23/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I moved all the jars from calculator-webapp to tomcat/lib.
calculator-webapp
runs fine. What else is there that might cause a problem?
Haleh
On 8/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I moved all the jars from calculator-webapp to tomcat/lib.
calculator-webapp
runs fine. What else is there that might cause a problem?
I think option 1 for 0.99 is the best (and safest) that we can do in
the time available. So +1 for the 0.99 part. I need to give more
thought to 1.0.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On 8/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07,
Simon Nash wrote:
I think option 1 for 0.99 is the best (and safest) that we can do in
the time available.
+1
On 8/23/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think option 1 for 0.99 is the best (and safest) that we can do in
the time available. So +1 for the 0.99 part. I need to give more
Simon Laws wrote:
I worry we'd not get anything other than 1/ done by tomorrow and even then
the READMEs etc would have bugs. So my preference would be for 0.99 do 1/
for the big webapps but keep the small prebuilt ones. The big ones are:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
account for about 50MB:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war
sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war
On 8/22/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
account for about 50MB:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war
ant elder wrote:
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
account for about 50MB:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war
sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war
On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
account for about 50MB:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support for
implementation.web.
For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the
0.99 release.
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples - currently all of
the tuscany
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support
for implementation.web.
For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the
0.99 release.
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples -
+1 for I think we should just document how to copy the required JARs to the
Tomcat lib folder and run the stripped down WARs this way, assuming that
it works.
We anyways have the READMEs where we put in documentation on how to run the
samples. Adding this step for webapps seems fine to me
On 8/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote:
I like having the samples, in the absence of extensive documentation
these are key to understanding Tuscany...
I like the idea of packaging the samples as simple SCA contribution
jar's. I
ant elder wrote:
On 8/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote:
I like having the samples, in the absence of extensive documentation
these are key to understanding Tuscany...
I like the idea of packaging the samples as
On 8/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 8/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote:
I like having the samples, in the absence of extensive documentation
these are key to understanding
So, let me try to understand this. We are going to remove the -webapp
samples from the release binary distribution (due to size constrains),
but we are still going to continue supporting the -webapp story. Users
can still see these samples on the source distributions, right ?
I'm asking this
It would be good to get user 's view on this as well. I am re-posting to
tuscany-user list since I am not sure if everyone monitors both lists.
On 8/11/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our SCA binary distribution is over 100Meg now and there's still
extensions
and dependencies I've
Our SCA binary distribution is over 100Meg now and there's still extensions
and dependencies I've not added yet. This seems a little big considering
we're trying to sell Tuscany as all svelte and light weight.
So what to do? The reason its so big is that every webapp sample and demo we
have ends
27 matches
Mail list logo
