kelvin goodson wrote:
Luciano,
can you confirm in the JIRA whether the updated fix is good? I'll
keep an eye on this thread to see how your plans develop, and what
that might mean for SDO release plans.
Kelvin.
On 10/09/2007, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have found an
We have found an issue on the SDO Tools, described in JIRA-1673 [1]
that is affecting the proper generation of java interfaces from a
given wsdl.
What's the plan to get this fix, when available, in SCA 1.0 release ?
This might require a new SDO release ?
[1]
Great, so looks like we would need a DAS release compatible with SDO
1.0 in order to include any SCA/DAS integration in the SCA 1.0
release. I'll try to get that done, by cutting a branch and working on
a DAS release sometime this week. Please let me know if there is any
changes in plan.
On
That would be my guess unless there's a newer SDO release by then but i've
not seen any mention of that in the SDO emails.
...ant
On 8/27/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you guys thinking about SDO requirements for SCA 1.0 release
? SDO 1.0-incubating ?
--
There are no plans in place yet for the next SDO release.
1.0-incubating would seem the obvious choice.
Kelvin.
On 28/08/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be my guess unless there's a newer SDO release by then but i've
not seen any mention of that in the SDO emails.
...ant
