we decided to abandon...was there a VOTE? Please refresh my memory.
thanks,
dims
On 3/21/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Sebastien
My understanding is that these are separate modules that are not
going to
destabelize the
, was: Componentizing our SCA runtime
kernel
we decided to abandon...was there a VOTE? Please refresh my memory.
thanks,
dims
On 3/21/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Sebastien
My understanding is that these are separate
, March 21, 2007 10:54 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Working in trunk, was: Componentizing our SCA runtime
kernel
we decided to abandon...was there a VOTE? Please refresh my memory.
thanks,
dims
On 3/21/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Luciano
On Mar 21, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
we decided to abandon...was there a VOTE? Please refresh my memory.
Yes, that was when we voted to move Chianti to trunk.
Jim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 3/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on how we could componentize our SCA
runtime kernel. I posted two diagrams on our Wiki at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Componentizing+our+runtime
to
Hi,
My view is that, if the design that Sebastien is proposing is a step forward
in our modularization goals then its good to get it into the trunk. I like
the design and here is my +1 to move this into the trunk. IMO, moving to
the trunk does not mean the kernel will have to be immediately
Jim Marino wrote:
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on how we could componentize our SCA
runtime kernel. I posted two diagrams on our Wiki at
Hi Sebastien
My understanding is that these are separate modules that are not going to
destabelize the trunk at the moment. My personal opinion is that it would be
OK to have this work done in the trunk as most of new work is being
developed.
--
Luciano Resende
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Sebastien
My understanding is that these are separate modules that are not
going to
destabelize the trunk at the moment. My personal opinion is that it
would be
OK to have this work done in the trunk as most of new work is being
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on how we could componentize our SCA
runtime kernel. I posted two diagrams on our Wiki at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Componentizing+our+runtime
to help start the discussion.
One of the ideas is to allow for
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on how we could componentize our
SCA runtime kernel. I posted two diagrams on our Wiki at http://
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Componentizing+our
+runtime
11 matches
Mail list logo
