[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nishant Joshi updated TUSCANY-2251:
---
Attachment: generatedClientCode.zip
I m using TopDown approch to generate proxy from wsdl
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
...
I can do the following:
- Provide a few pre-canned init methods that bootstrap the subset of a
Tuscany runtime required for your scenarios. I'll start with these:
a) list deployables in a contribution
b) resolve deployables given the set of available
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Mario Antollini (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
Multiplicity for heterogeneous bindings not working
---
Key: TUSCANY-2259
URL:
Richard Mah wrote:
Hi,
Yes. I'm interested in only a subset of Tuscany and not the entire
runtime. Thanks for the answer.
The ModuleActivators I'm trying to use are
WSDLInterfaceRuntimeModuleActivator,
JavaInterfaceRuntimeModuleActivator, and JavaRuntimeModuleActivator.
This leads to another
I'm writing sample admin tasks that need to work with our models
(implementations, interfaces, policies) to inspect SCA artifacts, build
them, wire them, package them etc.
I don't want to have to drag the whole Tuscany runtime in these tasks or
have to bootstrap the runtime layer (activator,
On April 1, I checked out a file from SVN. Its version keywords
were not expanded in my local copy. Yesterday I checked out the
same file and the version keywords were expanded. This caused my
attempt to apply a patch (derived from the previous checkout)
to fail.
The file when viewed in SVN
SVN stores the keywords along with the file and does not store the expanded
keywords internally. So, when the file is viewed in svn, it will show
@version $Rev$ $Date$. It is the svn client that expands these keywords
when the file is checked out. These keywords have been added to svn after
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On April 1, I checked out a file from SVN. Its version keywords
were not expanded in my local copy. Yesterday I checked out the
same file and the version keywords were expanded. This caused my
attempt to apply a patch
Hi Simon,
Have you recently changed your Subversion configuration file to enable SVN
keyword expansion? The file in question is located:
Windows %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Subversion\config
Linux ~/.subversion/config
The value in question is enable-auto-props. If this is set to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2260:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Validation Testcases Part -2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2260.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Thanks for the patch Hasan. Committed at
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Yang Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Simon's emphases on the
This looks really good, do you have plans to extend it further like with
adding clients or other extension types?
...ant
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Page Edited : TUSCANYhttp://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY:
Build
your first Web Services
On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote
bindings
to services with interfaces not marked as
Lets say we have a component A in composite C1, which needs a reference to a
remotable service exposed with default binding (i.e., binding.sca) in
component B under composite C2. In such scenario how should i configure the
(binding) reference in composite C1?
--
Thanks Regards,
Ramkumar
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning
Default monitor failure if bundle for local not found
-
Key: TUSCANY-2261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2261
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2261:
Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam
Default monitor failure if bundle for
Mark Combellack wrote:
Hi Simon,
Have you recently changed your Subversion configuration file to enable SVN
keyword expansion? The file in question is located:
Windows %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Subversion\config
Linux ~/.subversion/config
The value in question is
Flow XSD schema validation errors through the monitor
-
Key: TUSCANY-2262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2262
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Mark Combellack wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 April 2008 02:59
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding SVN version to Java files
Mark Combellack wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and
I reported an intermittent failure like this a few days ago. Are you
seeing this consistently?
--
Kevin
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I'm getting a vtest failure in my latest builds - any explanation?
I don't know whether the POLICY-26 proposal has been accepted. I think
POLICY-26 is a bit clearer in conveying the meaning of the different choices
than Venkat's proposal.
While POLICY-26 fixes the schema so that conflicting authorization elements
cannot be specified within a policy set, it does
It is not always happen. I suspect and curious that it is a timing issue.
For the first test atScope1, it created 4 threads. 2 of them were fine. See
ThreadB1-BService2
ThreadB2-BService9
But, other 2 threads failed at setCurrentState.
The code simply do:
CService cService =
Anyway, I checked in the updated model and processors under
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=650652view=rev. The processors can handle
both syntax. Please see the ProcessorTestCase.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Greg Dritschler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Updates to Exception's vtest
Key: TUSCANY-2263
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
Reporter:
Hi,
Here is a list of modules related to databinding:
1) databinding: The SPIs and default implementations, also a list of XML
parsing related databindings/transformers
2) databinding-*: Individual databindings such as SDO and JAXB
3) core-databinding:
Updates to RequestContext's vtest
-
Key: TUSCANY-2264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yee-Kang Chang updated TUSCANY-2263:
Attachment: ExceptionUpdatesJIRA2263.patch
Updates to Exception's vtest
Considering this has been there in several files for a while, and it
really does not affect anyone that does not want to use the extra one
line of information on the top of the java file. Why not let other
that see some benefits on this to use it ?
I'm still +1 on this.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yee-Kang Chang updated TUSCANY-2264:
Attachment: RequestContextUpdatesJIRA2264.patch
Updates to RequestContext's vtest
Hi Mike,
Would you do me a favor? Add a sleep as following code and retry.
public void atScope1() throws Exception {
...
CThread c2 = new CThread(ThreadC2);
// Please add following 2 lines.
System.out.println(make a delay);
Thread.sleep(1000);
My understanding is that expanded keywords are not considered in svn
diff, commit, etc, and it's more like a local visual piece of
information.
From [1], here is a little info on the subject.
Keywords and Spurious Differences
The user-visible result of keyword substitution might lead you to
Component stopped via ComponentManager can still be accessed
Key: TUSCANY-2265
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2265
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Yes, it's on my todo list for the next couple days...
Do you have any ideas for what type of extensions to use ? Maybe
JSON-RPC and use a quick web2.0 client app to consume the service ?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:39 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks really good, do you have
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Combellack wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 April 2008 02:59
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding SVN version to Java files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12591682#action_12591682
]
Catalin Boloaja commented on TUSCANY-1997:
--
Somehow it seems that the new static
Kevin Williams wrote:
I reported an intermittent failure like this a few days ago. Are you
seeing this consistently?
--
Kevin
Kevin,
Consistently enough for me to have to remove the vtests from my builds
in order to make some progress
Yours, Mike.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2263:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Updates to Exception's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2264:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Updates to RequestContext's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2263.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Updates to Exception's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2264.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Updates to RequestContext's vtest
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Here is a list of modules related to databinding:
1) databinding: The SPIs and default implementations, also a list of XML
parsing related databindings/transformers
2) databinding-*: Individual databindings such as SDO and JAXB
3) core-databinding:
I just realized that the databinding module is a bit messed up with the
CallableReference related code that drags in the dependency on core. IMO,
these should be refactored out. I'll try to fix that.
BTW, the databinding-??? modules doesn't have dependency on core-spi. It is
transitively
The test created 4 threads. Two threads got a stateless scope service
BService and called it. Another 2 threads got another stateless scope
service CService. In Mike's case, 2 threads of BService worked fine,
but other 2 threads of CService could not get the service because of
the
Oh, I also found a comment just before the declaration of the private
variable phaseManager in InvocationChainImpl
// FIXME: Not a good practice to use static reference
Is it related?
Regards
Gilbert
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Gilbert Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The test created 4
Hi all,
first of all I'd like to thank you for your support and encouragement
during GSoC student approval process (and for votes of course:))!
I'll do my best to end this task with success.
I'd like to wish more luck for those whose weren't accepted.
Congratulations for students which are in -
I have merged the policy dependency cleanup work we did for SCA 1.2 to
trunk under svn revision #651130.
In Summary, these changes introduce couple new modules that is being
used to break up ws specific dependencies from policy modules (e.g
policy-xml-ws and policy-security-ws). Other then
Issue raised in OASIS SCA Java TC. See [1].
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/email/archives/200804/msg00041.html
++Vamsi
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
PART-1:
The Java AnnotationsAPIs specification Lines 1407, 1408, 1409,
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2266 .
++Vamsi
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Issue raised in OASIS SCA Java TC. See [1].
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/email/archives/200804/msg00041.html
Problem with protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated
implementation
--
Key: TUSCANY-2266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2266
I agree with Luciano's perspective.
- Venkat
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Considering this has been there in several files for a while, and it
really does not affect anyone that does not want to use the extra one
line of information on the top of
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From the above, we have 4 +1s and no -1s - although we have a
preference not
to do this from ant. So, the consensus is to make this change.
We haven't held a formal vote, so I don't think we
Appears like unannotated protected fields computed as properties also have
the same problem.
Java Common Annotations and APIs - v1.0 - Sec 1.8.13:
1349 Properties may also be injected via public setter methods even when the
@Property annotation is not
1350 present. However, the @Property
54 matches
Mail list logo
