On 9/14/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI Sebasitien,
I just figured out that there is no need to generate the keys i.e. the
tuscanyKeys.jks again. Please go over to the
jre\lib\security\java.security
of the IBM JDK installation and set up the security providers as follows.
On 9/14/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI Sebasitien,
I just figured out that there is no need to generate the keys i.e. the
tuscanyKeys.jks again. Please go over to the
jre\lib\security\java.security
of the IBM JDK
On 9/14/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI Simon,
Thanks for bringing this point. I am figuring out what needs to be done
for
this. Do you know by any chance ?
thanks
- Venkat
On 9/14/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, there's a *lot* of development and code changes still going on in
the
1.0 branch but hardly any sample and doc fixes happening . I know everyone
wants to get their last minute fixes in but there will be other releases
after 1.0 . If we
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl
instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly?
Currently things do
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.
Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get?
...ant
yep, will do. Just building again now
Simon
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.
Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build
On 9/16/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following the README posted, I did the following in different command
windows:
1) ant runDomainNode
.. starts fine
2) ant runNodeB
... Fails with the following exception trace.
Buildfile: build.xml
runNodeB:
[java] Sep 16, 2007
On 9/16/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The axis2 ws binding has an itest that exercises the 'confidentialy policy
intent' which is realized by encrypting the parts of the soap xml. Though
we are just about using Rampart, WSS4J, under the covers there seems to be
On 9/17/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the same issue
On 9/16/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the following test failure in the implementation-composite
sample
with a top-down build but it's passing if I build the module alone.
Any
On 9/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples
On 9/17/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The readme for this sample does not tell users how to run it. It has one
line in the readme as follows:
http://localhost:8080/sample-helloworld-ws-service-webapp/SCA/HelloWorldService?wsdl
Is this suppose to be run with another
On 9/17/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we have a change freeze in the branch please while we take stock of
where we are.
There's so many changes going on still everytime i update to get the
final
thing to review
On 9/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have time to do that right now but i'm ok with the change if
someone else wants to.
...ant
On 9/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok its going to take me a few hours to catch up all the license and notice
file changes required for all the recent additions so lets lift the change
freeze for a few more hours, so till say 1pm BST. Please be real careful
with what you change
I made a local distro from the branch and the samples seem to take ages to
get going. A really comical amount of time! It takes 25 seconds before I see
any output after running the calculator sample. Anyone else seeing that?
Simon
We have no README etc. for samples\helloworld-ws-service-webapp. Do we need
this sample? As we have calculator-ws-webapp can we remove
helloworld-ws-service-webapp? Happy to keep and fix it if there is a good
reason and there are important differences that it's demonstrating but one
less thing to
On 9/11/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/07, Marco Dalco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raised a JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1684
Information contained in this e-mail and any attachments are intended
for the use of the addressee only
SCADomain, in both of its guises, allows the details of which contribution
to load to be specified.
the standalone version
o.a.t.s.host.embedded.SCADomain.newInstance(String domainURI, String
contributionLocation, String... composites)
and the distributed version
see
the
result output.
Kelvin.
On 17/09/2007, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a local distro from the branch and the samples seem to
take
ages
to
get going. A really comical amount of time! It takes 25 seconds
before
I see
any output
On 9/18/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just fixed the credit-check webapp under r576753.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:27 AM
Subject:
On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked the LICENSE file against the lib directory of RC1c.
I'm sure this process could be more automated given time, but for
reference here's what I did
cd lib
ls | sed s/[0-9\.]*\.jar// libnoversion.txt
then I hand finessed
On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now seeing a couple of issues with the samples. One is that I
have to run ant compile before ant run in all cases I have tried
so far. The other is that I now see samples such as calculator
executing and completing, but taking 18
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now seeing a couple of issues with the samples. One is that I
have to run ant compile before ant run in all cases I have tried
so far. The other is that I now see samples
I notice that there are couple of policy items in the Java SCA FAQ index
but no actual entries. Is this just a work in progress or did something go
wrong?
Simon
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now seeing a couple of issues with the samples. One is that I
have to run ant compile before ant run in all cases I have
Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.0-incubating
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok but lets keep this vote going in the meantime - please keep on
reviewing
so if there's any other issues we can catch them before any respin. Also
if
everyone could say if you see
On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows XP
On 18/09/2007, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant run works fine with a few that I ran using RC2 bin distro.
I am running on windows. What are you running on Kelvin?
On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/18/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon, that's work in progress. I just added them as I was editing the
CHANGES file with links to the FAQ. I'll get the content in there soon.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.0-incubating
On 9/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, Simon
On 9/19/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The top-down build of the tagged version is failing against an empty local
maven repo. wsdl4j 1.6.2 cannot be found in any of the maven repos. I
already added the staging repo. The artifact is available at
ws.zones.apache.org/repository,
On 9/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The top-down build of the tagged version is failing against an empty
local
maven repo. wsdl4j 1.6.2 cannot be found
Some people are seeing
---
Running composite.CompositeTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.296 sec
FAILURE!
test(composite.CompositeTestCase) Time elapsed: 1.203 sec ERROR!
On 9/19/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(cut)
yep , thats what I have. Seems to do the trick.
I now have...
[INFO]
[ERROR
On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's where mine now fails too.
On 19/09/2007, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just seen Simon Laws' earlier note about my first issue.
Kelvin.
On 19/09/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a sequence of non-reproducible issues building from this tag
first I got
[INFO
.
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
Downloading:
http://download.java.net/maven/1/woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
- Venkat
On 9/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
or shall i just call a vote on it?
...ant
On 9/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's where mine now fails too.
On 19/09/2007, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This RC3a is looking good to me, i've built it, the distros from that,
then
built that src distro, run a few samples including webapp ones, built
some
webapp samples with the Ant scripts
On 9/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and +1 from me.
...ant
On 9/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.0 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about
also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out? If we keep changes
in the branch to an
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome aboard!
..ant
On 9/19/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
The Tuscany PPMC and the Incubator PMC have voted for Simon to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Simon!
I'm sure that
-- Forwarded message --
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 20, 2007 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Change freeze on 1.0 branch
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a
On 9/20/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you still seeing this? I'm getting it in the trunk with the
latest update.
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm get a similar build failure related to surefire in the 1.0 branch:
[INFO] Configured Artifact:
On 9/20/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for volunteering. That would be great that we do in a batch.
Please note some of the changes may have already been merged not by the
check-in sequence.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL
On 9/20/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on the proposal. I think a cleaning up the components to a shortlist
will be nice.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL
://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-322 --
version2.3.1-SNAPSHOT/version
I'm updating my trunk to latest revision and would give it a try.
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you still seeing
On 9/20/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The BPEL related projects are already merged. They have some
differences as trunk has been evolving.
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for volunteering
On 9/20/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I updated to r577913, built implementation-notification and
binding-notification, and the samples. Everything looks ok.
Did you also want me to cross check with the branch, or just
check the trunk?
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL
On 9/20/07, Yan (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
Will binding-jms be available in Tuscany SCA Java 1.0?
--
Key: TUSCANY-1781
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1781
\DomainServer.java:[34,32]
cannot find symbol
symbol : class NodeImpl
location: class node.DomainServer
Is this a merge issue ?
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I updated to r577913, built implementation-notification
On 9/21/07, Simon Nash (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529426]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-1784:
-
i like
On 9/22/07, Joseph, Roshan IN BLR SISL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I believe the JMS binding is not included in the latest release and if
it is due to bugs, I would like to contribute in making it work. Can
someone point to the issues in JMS binding or let me know the current
status of
On 9/21/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i've found the bug that it doens't permit myself to use SCA Binding over
WebService modifying the distributed-calculator. I found it (on Tuscany
1.0 rc3) following the chain towards the wire, and i discovered that
it's an Axis Fault. If
On 9/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i've found the bug that it doens't permit myself to use SCA Binding over
WebService modifying the distributed-calculator. I found it (on Tuscany
1.0 rc3) following the chain towards
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run up to
0.99 and 1.0 release in terms of the consistency with which we raise bug
reports and assign them to releases. Based on Ant's
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/21/07, Simon Nash (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
i like the diagram on the Wiki version of the Web site a lot better.
I have been browsing the Wiki. I couldn't find a diagram different
On 9/26/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is already due...
+1
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at java/sca/modules and java/sca/itest and would like to
delete or move to contrib some old / dormant / broken / unused modules.
/25/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the source for a few of the diagrams that are used in the wiki in
my
sandbox. Not the best place for them.
1/ Where is everyone putting this kind of source? How about we have a
wiki/diagrams section of svn?
2/ I note that the doc
On 9/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run
up
to
0.99
We have two SCADomain interfaces (I'm leaving aside EmbeddedSCADomain for
now)
1) o.a.t.s.host.embedded.SCADomain (supports a domian with a single node)
public static SCADomain newInstance()
public static SCADomain newInstance(String composite)
*A* public static SCADomain
On 9/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have two SCADomain interfaces (I'm leaving aside EmbeddedSCADomain
for
now)
1) o.a.t.s.host.embedded.SCADomain (supports a domian with a single
node)
public static SCADomain
On 9/26/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we also consider how this SCADomain would work in the context
of multiple contributions ?
On 9/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/25/07, dinesh shahane (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
Build Error - SCA topology XML model fails to resolve tuscany-core-spi
--
Key: TUSCANY-1809
URL:
On 9/27/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about
charged with the creation and maintenance of open source software that:
* simplifies the development of service oriented applications,
* implements the SCA standards as defined by the OpenCSA group at OASIS,
and
* provides a
On 9/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This first part seems like a big improvement to me:
open-source software that simplifies development and management of
applications using service oriented approach.
I've updated the text on the wiki to say that, I'm not so sure about The
On 9/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So you have 4 more days after Sunday :) But there's no reason to rush out,
I'm just clarifying the timeline, you'll be ready when you'll be ready
and
you can also target Nov. 21st.
on the standards defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group,
for distribution at no charge to the public.
Paul
On 9/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about
charged
On 9/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So you have 4 more days after Sunday
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Starting another thread based on Ant's comment:
- the openness of the specs and our interaction with OSOA has been
brought up before by the Incubator. Most things have now moved to OASIS
and that should resolve those issues but stuff
Sebastien
Thank you for these thoughts. My comment in line below. I'll post separate,
but hopfully consistent, comments on the code you made.
Simon
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastien
Thank you for these thoughts. My comment in line below. I'll post
separate, but hopfully consistent, comments on the code you made.
Simon
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
Simon
at
Sebastien's sandbox and get back.. maybe with better clarity ;-)
thanks
- Venkat
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 9/26/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sync is being done from the svn to the website.
The sync script I'm using is :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/site/bin/sync
On 9/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL
On 9/28/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Venkat said, we have been consistent making releases. We should be
able to mark this done.
On 9/27/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'd think so and this is not with just the 1.0 release but with the
fact that we
code be in a non-personal sandbox so we can
all
help update it?
...ant
On 9/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had promised more thoughts on top of your interface thoughts. Here
they are.
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote
Same thoughts translated into interface
With the latest trunk I'm getting the following from
\binding-ws-axis2\src\test\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\binding\ws\axis2\itests\QuestionMarkWSDLTestCase.java
HTTP ERROR: 500
javax.wsdl.extensions.UnknownExtensibilityElement incompatible with
javax.wsdl.extensions.schema.Schema
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the latest trunk I'm getting the following from
\binding-ws-axis2\src\test\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\binding\ws\axis2\itests\QuestionMarkWSDLTestCase.java
HTTP ERROR: 500
javax.wsdl.extensions.UnknownExtensibilityElement
incompatible
On 9/28/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this error when I was trying to build just this module but it went
away when I did a full build.
I do see another error now at runtime (NoClassDefFound) in this module. It
could be due to scope=test
Helloworld-ws-service/pom.xml
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the latest trunk I'm getting the following from
\binding-ws-axis2\src\test\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\binding\ws\axis2\itests\QuestionMarkWSDLTestCase.java
HTTP ERROR: 500
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all started a while back with this
thread ( http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg20657.html).
On 10/1/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all
On 10/1/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Interesting question here about which piece of configuration wins. I guess
that if you have gone to the trouble to specify the WSDL over and above
the
intent the WSDL should win.
I
On 10/1/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I must admit a preference for keeping Wiki related things on the Wiki.
So, let's say you want an image on a page, then why not have its source
attached to that same page also? Much much easier to keep track of Wiki
stuff that way.
On 10/1/07, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A long while ago, Tuscany used to use the Store [1] interface in it's
Conversational Scope container to persist data.
However, this is no longer the case as Tuscany-1456 [2] updated the
ConversationalScopeContainer to store the data in a
On 9/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I looked into the binding-jsonrpc. It seems that the jsonrpc service
binding currently uses the JSONRPCBridge to dispatch the inbound call
to the SCA component. Is there
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/28/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this error when I was trying to build just this module but it
went
away when I did a full build.
I do see another error now at runtime
On 10/1/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dependency is due to programmatic startup of ActiveMQ broker. We need
it
for SOAP/JMS and JMS binding tests unless we require the broker to be
started manually from the command line.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws
with UnknowExtensibilityElement
deserializer.
I don't know why the full build doesn't catch the ?wsdl issue. Let me take
a
look and I think the fix might be as simple as disabling the Schema
extension serializer.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL
On 10/1/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 This sounds reasonable, and open.
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing
On 10/2/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dependency is due to programmatic startup of ActiveMQ broker. We
need
it
for SOAP/JMS and JMS binding tests unless we require
I've been trying to get a clean build for a long time today so I can check
the Domain/Node changes in and I can't manage it. This is what I'm seeing
now...
[INFO] Apache Tuscany SCA Web Services Void Args and Return Test SUCCESS [
13.21
8s]
[INFO]
On 10/4/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just updated the trunk and did a clean build and it is SUCCESSFUL!
- Venkat
On 10/4/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to get a clean build for a long time today so I can
check
the Domain/Node changes
On 10/4/07, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use Tuscany as a library (rather than a runtime) to parse
a
reference or service definition containing bindings, and obtain a proxy to
a
service.
At the moment, I create a composite containing a dummy component
with the OSGi registry.
Which code in Tuscany should I look at to create a reference on the fly?
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 10/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/4/07, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use Tuscany as a library
for
specification of JMS parameter values (things like Queue names, for
example).
Simon Laws wrote:
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all started
. :)
Thanks
- Venkat
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all started a while back
On 10/4/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Here's sample code to illustrate that use case:
701 - 800 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo
