Re: SCA WS Binding Wrapper Style

2007-11-26 Thread Simon Nash
Bentley, What modifications are needed to your code to make it conform to the doc/lit/wrapped standard? Is this just the removal of overloaded nethod names, or something else? Simon Bentley Johnson wrote: Hello, thanks for the response and input. One thing I realized was that I didn't

Re: SCA WS Binding Wrapper Style

2007-11-26 Thread Bentley Johnson
Simon, Yes, it requires the removal of overloaded methods and I also have to change any java objects to be in a javabean format. Although, this would have to be done either way. Our system had some code which was not conformed to javabean style and since we are now converting to use Tuscany,

Re: SCA WS Binding Wrapper Style

2007-11-26 Thread Bentley Johnson
I found another modification that will have to be done, unless there is alternative, however, this may be related to Javabeans being used for object serialization. In many instances, the parameters or return types of our service methods are java interfaces and there are implementations of these

Re: SCA WS Binding Wrapper Style

2007-11-26 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Laws wrote: [snip] The assumption I'm making from the info you gave is that you want to have two SCA components communicate with the same domain but be able to specify the WSDL that the web services binding uses. I guess what you would need to be able to do is specify a binding something

Question regarding SCADomainFinder

2007-11-26 Thread Jeff Davis
Hi, I'm attempting to perform some testing using some of the distributed features of Tuscany. I have done the following: 1) In one Java main class, started a new domain. 2) In another Java main, started a node that registered a service. I was able to verify the service was working correctly by