Jeff:
IMHO, people are not emphasizing enough how significant SCA's contribution
is to the evolution of the programming model of information systems (while
accomplishing it without disrupting existing investments).
People have been building information systems with a CRUD-Oriented
Synchronous Cli
To everybody out there interested in seeing SCA being more widely adopted.
Recently I posted a general overview of SCA coverage at JavaWorld last
week in San Francisco. Which can be found at
http://agileconsulting.blogspot.com/2008/05/highlights-of-sca-at-javaworld-2008.html
I spoke briefly about
I am cc'ing tunscay-users since this seems to be interesting to users and
they may not be on the dev list.
Thanks Mike.
On 5/17/08, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I've just committed some changes to the implementation-bpel and
> implementatio-bpel-ode code in trunk which
Luciano, Mike:
thanks for the detailed answer. Yes, I am aware there are different types. I
am not so concerned having to declare an implementation within the same
domain. As a matter of fact, it looks to me that it is not even within an
entire domain, but within a composite since there is an impl
Jean-Jacques Dubray wrote:
Luciano:
thanks, actually in the test/bpel/helloworld-reference composite definition
you also have a component defined with a binding.ws and there to, there is
an implementation.java element. Is it required?
Would you consider ws bindings as the preferred way t
