State of BPEL implementation type?

Hello, I would like to ask about the current state and plans for the BPEL implementation type, especially the BPEL reference support. I see that there is an itest "helloworld-reference" for this that is not included in the build and it does not work if invoked manually. So I suppose this is not ye

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

> If I now finally manage to wire up two implementation.osgi > components via a binding.ws, I can happily leave for Easter > vacation (-: It works (-: Thank you very much for your great support (and patience), I really learned a lot here. Happy holidays (to whom it may concern)! Juergen

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Hi, > ... There is an > additional property on the proxy that you can filter on to > guarantee that the proxy is selected. Tuscany proxies have a > property "component.service.name" which is set to > SCAComponentName/SCAServiceName. The wiring examples in > itest/osgi-implementation use these

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Hi, I've done some experiments now and this leads me to another question: In my sample a component A calls a component B which in turn uses the ComponentContext to get a CallableReference to start a conversation with a component C. This works with implementation.java. Then I switched A and B to

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Comments inline, > -Original Message- > From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:58 AM > To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tuscany in OSGi > > > -> "SCA runtime does not perform reference injection for OSGi-based > > component implem

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Hi again, Ok, I'm getting further, i can use implementation.osgi now in Eclipse/Equinox, can call an OSGi service from an implementation.java component and expose an OSGi service using binding.ws. That's good (-: Thanks for your support! Now the next step: references of an implementation.osgi se

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

> Could you try a newer build - I am struggling to keep up with > changes to Tuscany. > > If the tests continue to fail, could you send me a full log please? Everything is fine here now. "mvn" runs without errors both in sca/ and in sca/itest/osgi-tuscany (trunk, r638257 according to svnversion

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Rajini, >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.test.osgi.tuscany.OSGiTuscanyRuntimeTestCase.te >> stOSGiTuscanyUsingOSGiClient(OSGiTuscanyRuntimeTestCase.java:106) >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: >> javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeConfigurationException: Provider >> org.apache.xerces.jaxp.datatyp

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Hi, Thanks for the advice, it seems that the missing bundle activator was the basic problem, but then it started to get really funny (-; First, I just used the itest/osgi-tuscany bundles and got an error "missing .componentType side file .componentType". Ok, that seemed to be one step further.

RE: Tuscany in OSGi

Hi, in the meantime we managed to run our sample by creating a single bundle for all Tuscany modules (and one for the 3rd party stuff) and deploying our composite as a contribution JAR to a org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.embedded.impl.EmbeddedSCADomain by adapting the code from the setup method of

RE: Build process fails on german system

Everything looks fine now. Thanks (-: Cheers, Jürgen. -Original Message- From: Luciano Resende [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:33 AM To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Build process fails on german system I have added the workaround under revision #

RE: Build process fails on german system

Hi, > Could you please let me know what was the exception you had to modify ? Of course. Here's the diff, the file is in java\sca\samples\calculator-implementation-policies\src\test\java\calculator\ Index: CalculatorTestCase.java =

Build process fails on german system

Hello, I cannot build Tuscany SCA from the source code in the repository on my system, because it fails when running the test in samples\calculator-implementation-policies: The test case checks for an exception message text which depends on the default locale of the operating system. The only way

RE: State of implementation-bpel?

Hi, thanks, that sounds good. Maybe, beginning next year we can help on the implementation. It depends on some company decisions to be made then. Cheers, Juergen. -Original Message- From: Luciano Resende [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 1:23 PM To: tuscany-user@

State of implementation-bpel?

Hello, I'm very interested in the BPEL implementation type of Tuscany. >From reading about SCA and BPEL I got the impression that it should be possible to use BPEL to orchestrate other SCA (Java, POJO) components. This seems not(yet?) to be possible with the Tuscany BPEL integration. At least, I