On 09Sep2018 23:00, Chip Wachob wrote:
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Actually he's getting back bytearray instances from transfer and wants to
join them up (his function does a few small transfers to work around an
issue with one big transfer). His earlier code is
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 08Sep2018 11:40, Alan Gauld wrote:
>>
>> On 08/09/18 03:15, Chip Wachob wrote:
>>>
>>> Ideally, I'd like to take the slice_size chunks that have been read
>>> and concatenate them back togetjer into a long MAX_LOOP_COUNT size
>>> array
On 09/10/2018 05:51 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> Sorry, I don't think many people here are experts on building packages,
> especially on MacOS. You could try the "Python-List" mailing list as
> well.
>
> I know I can't do more than offer a few vague, general questions which
>
On 10/09/18 04:00, Chip Wachob wrote:
> I presume that I need to instantiate an array of slice_size-sized bytearrays.
Cameron has already addressed this and explained
that you don't need to and if you did how to do it.
I'd only add that you need to readjust your thinking
when it comes to Python
Hi Glenn,
Sorry, I don't think many people here are experts on building packages,
especially on MacOS. You could try the "Python-List" mailing list as
well.
I know I can't do more than offer a few vague, general questions which
may or may not point you in the right direction. See below.
On
On 09/10/2018 09:10 AM, Alex Kleider wrote:
> In another currently active thread Mats Wichmann recommends using:
> python -m pip install ...
> vs
> pip install ...
>
> The question is how to install a specific version of python itself.
>
> I'm running Ubuntu 16.04 and have the following
In another currently active thread Mats Wichmann recommends using:
python -m pip install ...
vs
pip install ...
The question is how to install a specific version of python itself.
I'm running Ubuntu 16.04 and have the following notes to myself as to
how to install version 3.6 which was the
Cameron,
Thank you again for the insight.
Yes, data_out is an equivalently-sized 'chunk' of a larger array.
I'm 'getting' this now..
So, without all the fluff associated with wiggling lines, my function
now looks like this:
def RSI_size_the_loop():
results = []
all_together = [] # not
Hi Glen,
I feel like I would be able to offer you some help but you haven't
provided precise enough information for me to know exactly what your
problem is.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 00:02, Glenn Schultz via Tutor wrote:
>
> I have a package that I am working on. I am using Pycharm. The
Chip Wachob wrote:
> Cameron,
>
> Thank you again for the insight.
>
> Yes, data_out is an equivalently-sized 'chunk' of a larger array.
>
> I'm 'getting' this now..
>
> So, without all the fluff associated with wiggling lines, my function
> now looks like this:
>
> def RSI_size_the_loop():
Peter,
I see that clue "[[".
The thread history pretty much sums up what is going on up to this point.
I'll cover it once more:
I'm using Adafruit FT232H Breakout board and Adafruit's library.
https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Python_GPIO
Per Adafruit's example code, I create an SPI
On 10Sep2018 10:23, Chip Wachob wrote:
So, without all the fluff associated with wiggling lines, my function
now looks like this:
def RSI_size_the_loop():
results = []
all_together = [] # not certain if I need this, put it in in an
attempt to fix the incompatibility if it existed
You
On 10/09/18 19:15, Chip Wachob wrote:
> So I see why my .join() isn't working. I'm not sure how to fix it though.
I already showed you the sum() function.
It can take a list of lists and add them together
end_array = sum(results,[])
> My background is in C and other 'historical' languages,
13 matches
Mail list logo
